国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2012, Issue (3): 4-4
    
右美托咪啶对高血压患者麻醉诱导期心血管反应的影响
全立新, 李坚, 倪东妹, 王东信1()
1.北京大学第一医院
Effects of dexmedetomidine on cardiovascular response during anesthetic induction in hypertensive patients
 全文:
摘要:

目的:评估右美托咪啶对高血压患者在麻醉诱导和气管插管期间心血管反应的影响。 方法:采用前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究设计。选择术前合并高血压病并接受规范抗高血压治疗的患者按随机数字表法分为右美托咪啶组(D组)和对照组(C组),诱导前分别静脉输注右美托咪啶(初始量1.0 μg/kg,输注10 min,继以0.7 μg/kg/h输注15 min)或等量生理盐水。麻醉诱导均采用舒芬太尼、丙泊酚和罗库溴铵,维持脑电双频谱指数(bispectral index,BIS)值40-60。记录患者在试验药物给药前、后和麻醉诱导期间的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和血压变化。 结果:给予实验药物后治疗组的SBP和心率(HR)较对照组明显降低[分别为(139.1±23.9)mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133kPa)比(165.2±18.3)mm Hg,P<0.001和(63.8±11.3)次/min比(77.2±13.0)次/min,P=0.001]。麻醉诱导后喉镜暴露前治疗组的SBP、DBP下降幅度明显低于对照组[分别为(-14.6±9.6)%比(-34.5±10.7)%,P<0.001和(-7.2±9.6)%比(-28.7±12.0)%,P<0.001]。气管插管后1 min时治疗组的SBP、DBP和HR均明显低于对照组[分别为SBP(134.0±25.8)mm Hg比(171.6±30.0)mm Hg,P<0.001;DBP(78.1±17.7)mm Hg比(93.3±17.5)mm Hg,P=0.009;HR(71.1±11.0)次/min比(91.1±14.0)次/min,P<0.001]。 结论:右美托咪啶复合丙泊酚、舒芬太尼能减弱高血压患者在麻醉诱导期间的血压下降,并能抑制气管插管所引起的心血管反应。

关键词: 高血压;麻醉;气管内插管;心血管反应;右美托咪啶
Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine on cardiovascular response during anesthetic induction and endotracheal intubation in hypertensive patients. Interventions: This was a prospective, double-blind, and placebo controlled study. Patients with preoperative diagnosed and well controlled hypertension were enrolled and randomly divided into dexmedetomidinegroup(group D)and control group(group C). Dexmedetomidine (an initial dose of 1.0 μg/kg for 10 min, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.7 μg/kg/h) or normal saline was administered 25 minutes before anesthetic induction. Anesthesia was induced with sufentanil, propofol, and rocuronium. BIS was maintained from 40 to 60. Hemodynamic parameters including systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP), and heart rate (HR) were measured and the percent changes were calculated during both anesthetic induction and intubation. Results: After administration of experimental drugs,SBP and HR were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group [(139.1 ± 23.9) mm Hg vs. (165.2 ± 18.3 )mm Hg, P<0.001 and (63.8 ± 11.3) bpm vs. (77.2 ± 13.0) bpm, P=0.001, respectively]. Before insertion of the laryngoscopy, the percentage decreased in SBP and DBP were significantly less in the treatment group than in the control group [(-14.6± 9.6)% vs. (-34.5± 10.7)%, P<0.001 and (-7.2± 9.6)% vs. (-28.7± 12.0)%, P<0.001, respectively]. One minute after endotracheal intubation, SBP, DBP, and HR were significantly lower in the treatment group than that in the control group [SBP: (134.0 ± 25.8) mm Hg vs. (171.6 ± 30.0) mm Hg, P<0.001; DBP: (78.1 ± 17.7) mm Hg vs. (93.3 ± 17.5) mm Hg, P=0.009; and HR: (71.1 ± 11.0) bpm vs.(91.1 ± 14.0 )bpm, P<0.001, respectively】. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine combined with propofol and sufentanil suppressed the decrease in blood pressure due to anesthetic induction and blunted the cardiovascular response to endotracheal intubation in hypertensive patients.

Key words: Hypertension; Anesthesia; Endotracheal intubation;Cardiovascular response ; Dexmedetomidine