国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2012, Issue (11): 5-5
    
异丙酚芬太尼复合不同剂量右美托咪定麻醉对老年患者血液动力学及脊髓诱发电位的影响
林生, 张春宏, 陈正燕, 倪淑芹, 邵伟, 沈炳华, 谭江威, 杜伟1()
1.烟台市烟台山医院
Effects of propofol and fentanil compounded different doses of dexmedetomidine on hymodynamics and intraoperative somatosensory and motor evoked potentials monitoring of senile patient
 全文:
摘要:

【摘要】目的 探讨异丙酚芬太尼复合不同剂量右美托咪定麻醉对老年患者血液动力学及对体感诱发电位(somatosensory evoked potentials, SEPs)、运动诱发电位监测(motor evoked potentials,MEPs)的影响 方法 择期全麻颈椎前路手术患者45例, 依据右美托咪定剂量随机分成C组(对照组)、D1组(右美托咪定浓度0.3 μg•kg-1•h-1);D2组(右美托咪定浓度0.8 ug•kg-1•h-1)。3组麻醉诱导方法相同。麻醉诱导:静脉注射咪唑安定2 mg~3 mg、异丙酚Cp 1.5 mg/L(Marsh药代动力学参数)、芬太尼1.5 μg/kg~2 μg/kg,患者意识消失后经口置入4号喉罩,行机械通气。D1 、D2两组患者置入喉罩后给予右美托咪定 0.5 μg/kg静脉推注10 min完成,两组患者随即分别以0.3 μg•kg-1•h-1、0.8 μg•kg-1•h-1持续泵注至手术结束;C组患者以生理盐水代替右美托咪定,其余用药同D组。术中调整异丙酚芬太尼用量维持Bis值45~55之间,所有病例均不给入肌肉松弛剂,术中专人持续监测并记录SEPs、MEPs。结果:D1、D2组患者较C组患者苏醒时间明显延长,且 D2组苏醒时间较D1延长(P<0.05)。D1、D2组患者应用右美托咪定后心率减慢, MAP无明显变化。3组患者SEPs P15- N20的潜伏期、波幅均无明显差异(P>0.05)。D2组患者有3例出现不同程度MEPS波形消失,与D1组及C组(0/14)比较差异有统计学意义,且3例患者停用右美托咪定 20 min左右MEPS波形全部恢复。结论 右美托咪定延长苏醒时间,减慢患者心率,其对老年患者SEPs影响轻微,但较大剂量应用对MEPs产生抑制作用

关键词: 麻醉,全身;老年;麻醉药,静脉;诱发电位;美托咪定;二异丙酚
Abstract:

【Abstract】Objective To evaluate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine compounded propofol and fentanil on hymodynamics and intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)and motor evoked potentials(MEPs) monitoring on the senile people Methods Forty-five patients selectedly undergoing anterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery were randomly divided into three groups by the dose of Dex: group C (normal saline ); group D1 (Dex injected by0.3 ug•kg-1•h-1); group D2 (Dex injected by0.8 ug•kg-1•h-1). The induction of all patients in three groups :midazolam 2~3mg,propofol Cp 1.5 μg/ml(Marsh model), fentanil 1.5~2μg/kg .When the patient’s consciousness disappeared,a LMA was intubated and mechanical ventilation was made.In group D1 and group D2,dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg over 10 min) was administered and then respectively, followed by an infusion of 0.3 μg•kg-1•h-1 or 0.8 μg•kg-1•h-1 until the end of surgery.In group C, the same dose of NS instead of dexmedetomidine was administered and other methods of drugs giving and anesthesia were the same in group D1andD2.All patients were administrated by propofol and fentenil to keep bispectral index(Bis) from 45~55 by adjusting the concentration of propofol target controlled injection(TCI).Muscle relaxant wasn't inputed in whole operation and SEPs and MEPs were meatured by certain people during the operation. Results A more conscious time was observed in those patients of group D2 than group D1(P<0.05).There was a lower heart rate in the cohort of dexmedetomidine ,but no difference on mean arterial pressure(MAP) .About SEPs P15-N20 ,neither duration nor amplitude has a significant difference in three groups (P>0.05).Amplitude of MEPs in three patients of group D2 disappeared in different degrees.There was a significant difference from the cases of group D1 and C.After dexmedetomidine was stopped about 20 min-30 min, amplitudes of MEPs recoveried in all the three patients. Conclusions In senile patients, dexmedetomidine possibly prolonged analepsia time and decreased heart rate. Dexmedetomidine dose not significant influence the SEPs, but higher dose of dexmedetomidine depressed MEPs.

Key words: Anesthesia,anesthetics,general ;Senile;Intravenous; Evoked potentials; Medetomidine;Propofol