国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2014, Issue (1): 0-0
    
右美托咪定联合舒芬太尼用于二尖瓣狭窄患者瓣膜置换术后镇痛的效果观察
仇利娟1()
1.南通大学附属医院
Effect observation of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil on postoperative analgesia in patients with mitral stenosis undergoning valve replacement
 全文:
摘要:

【摘要】:目的:观察舒芬太尼联合盐酸右美托咪定用于二尖瓣狭窄患者瓣膜置换术后镇痛的疗效和安全性。方法:收集本院因二尖瓣狭窄需行瓣膜置换术的患者40例。年龄45~70岁,ASA分级Ⅱ~Ⅲ级。术后随机分为两组,分别接受舒芬太尼自控静脉镇痛(SF组)和舒芬太尼联合右美托咪定自控镇痛(SD组),比较两组患者术后12h(T1)、24h(T2)、36h(T3)、48h(T4)疼痛评分(VAS)、镇静(Ramsay)评分、平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏氧饱和度(SPO2)及不良反应的发生率。结果:(1)VAS评分比较:SD组T1、 T2、T3、T4时[(2.4±0.6)、(2.8±0.7)、(2.3±0.6)、(2.0±0.4)]VAS评分与SF组[(4.0±1.0)、(4.3±1.1)、(3.7±0.7)、(3.5±0.5)]比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)Ramsay评分比较:T1、 T2、T3、T4时SD组[(3.3±0.5)、(3.0±0.4)、(3.5±0.6)、( 3.2±0.7)]Ramsay评分与SF组[(1.2±0.6)、(1.4±0.4)、(1.2±0.5)、(1.1±0.6)]比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)MAP比较:与患者入室(T0)(82.9±11.9)时比较,SF组T1、 T2、T3、T4时[(98.6±10.9)、(98.9±12.1)、(95.7±13.1)、(93.1±12.9)]MAP增高有统计学意义(P<0.05);与(T0)(82.1±12.9)时比较SD组T1、 T2、T3、T4时[(85.6±10.4)、(86.2±9.7 )、(84.3±10.6)、(82.8±10.2)]MAP无统计学差异(P>0.05)。两组在T0时MAP无统计学差异(P>0.05),T1、 T2、T3、T4时SD组的MAP较SF组更为平稳(P<0.05)。(4)两组患者各时间点SPO2无统计学差异(P>0.05)。(5)不良反应的发生率比较:T1、 T2、T3、T4时恶心、呕吐的发生率SD组[10%、5%]明显低于SF组[25%、15%],有统计学差异(P<0.05);两组患者均无呼吸抑制发生。结论:右美托咪定联合舒芬太尼用于二尖瓣狭窄患者瓣膜置换术后镇痛,可以增加舒芬太尼的镇痛效果,镇静效果满意,不良反应发生率低。

关键词: 术后镇痛,右美托咪定,舒芬太尼,二尖瓣瓣膜置换术
Abstract:

【Abstract 】: Objective: To observe the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil for patients with mitral stenosis controlled intravenous analgesia after valve replacement . Methods: 40 cases of heart valve replacement surgery patients aged 45 - 70 years with American Society of Anesthesi ologists class Ⅱ~Ⅲ .All patinents were randomly assigned to, sufentanil group (SF group) and sufentanil combined with dexmedetomidine group (SD group). SF group was treated with sufentanil (0.09ug/kg/h)by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) and sufentanil (0.09ug/kg/h)combined with dexmedetomidine(0.08ug/kg/h) PCIA, the two groups were compared at 12h(T1)、24h(T2)、36h(T3)、48h(T4).The visual analog scale (VAS), Ramsay - score, mean radial artery pressure (MAP), finger pulse oxygen saturation (SPO2) and the rate of adverse reaction of patients after operation(respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, etc.) . Results: (1) VAS: At T1、 T2、T3、T4, there was significant difference between SD group [(2.4±0.6)、(2.8±0.7)、(2.3±0.6)、(2.0±0.4)]and SF group [(4.0±1.0)、(4.3±1.1)、(3.7±0.7)、(3.5±0.5)] in VAS(P<0.05).(2) Ramsay - score : At T1、 T2、T3、T4, there was significant difference between SD group[(3.3±0.5)、(3.0±0.4)、(3.5±0.6)、( 3.2±0.7)]and SF group [(1.2±0.6)、(1.4±0.4)、(1.2±0.5)、(1.1±0.6)] in Ramsay - score(P<0.05). (3) MAP: Compared with the MAP at T0 (82.9±11.9), the MAP at T1、 T2、T3、T4 [(98.6±10.9)、(98.9±12.1)、(95.7±13.1)、(93.1±12.9)was increased in SF group(P<0.05). Compared with the MAP at T0 (82.1±12.9), the MAP at T1、 T2、T3、T4 [(85.6±10.4)、(86.2±9.7 )、(84.3±10.6)、(82.8±10.2)]was no significant difference in SD group(P>0.05).There was no significant difference between SD group and SF group at T0(P>0.05). At T1、 T2、T3、T4, the MAP of SD group was more stable than SF group(P<0.05).(4) There was no significant difference between SD group and SF group at T0、 T1、 T2、T3、T4 in SPO2. (5) The rate of adverse reaction: At T1、 T2、T3、T4, the rate of nausea and vomiting in SD group [10%、5%] was obviously lower than SF goup [25%、15%](P<0.05). There was no respiratory inhibition in SF group and SD group. Conclusion: Sufentanil combined with dexmedetomidine to patients after valve replacement in mitral stenosis can increase the effort to sufentanil for analgesia . It provide satisfactory sedation and being low in adverse reaction.

Key words: Postoperative analgesia; dexmedetomidine ; sufentanil; mitral valve replacement