国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2013, Issue (6): 1-1
    
右美托咪啶联合异丙酚对等效剂量芬太尼和舒芬太尼诱发呛咳的影响
余骏马, 张野, 陆姚, 董春山, 刘齐1()
1.安徽医科大学第三附属医院 合肥市第一人民医院
Effect of dexmedetomidine-propofol on the response of cough by equipotent boluses of fentanyl and sufentanil
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨右美托咪啶联合异丙酚对等效剂量芬太尼和舒芬太尼诱发呛咳的影响。 方法 200例拟行全麻气管插管的择期手术患者,ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄18~65岁,随机数字表法分为4组(n=50):对照组(C1组、C2组)全麻诱导前静脉输注生理盐水0.15ml/kg+脂肪乳0.1ml/kg;右美托咪啶联合异丙酚组(DP1组、DP2组)全麻诱导前静脉输注右美托咪啶0.6μg/kg+异丙酚1mg/kg。1min后,C1、DP1组静脉5s注射芬太尼4μg/kg,C2、DP2组静脉5s注射舒芬太尼0.5μg/kg。记录注射芬太尼或舒芬太尼后1min内呛咳的发生情况和强度。之后继续全麻诱导及气管插管。记录各组静脉给药前(T0)、气管插管前(T1)、气管插管后(T2)的BP和HR。 结果 C1组、DP1组、C2组及DP2组呛咳发生率分别为:40 %、0、24%、0。与C1组和C2组比较,DP1组、DP2组呛咳发生率明显降低(P<0.01),但呛咳程度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与C1、C2组比较,DP1组、DP2组T1时SBP、DBP升高,T1、T2时HR降低(P<0.01);与T0时比较,四组SBP、DBP均下降,T1时四组HR下降,T2时DP1组、DP2组HR下降(P<0.01);与T1时比较,C1、C2组HR升高(P<0.01)。 结论 静脉注射右美托咪啶0.6μg/kg联合异丙酚1mg/kg可完全抑制等效剂量芬太尼和舒芬太尼诱发呛咳的发生,并可使患者全麻诱导气管插管期血流动力学更趋稳定。

关键词: 右美托咪啶;异丙酚;芬太尼;舒芬太尼;呛咳
Abstract:

[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine-propofol in suppressing the response of cough by equipotent boluses of fentanyl and sufentanil. Methods A total of 200 patients of ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ, aged 18-65 yr, undergoing elective surgery were randomized into four groups of 50 each, using computer-generated random numbers. Group C1 or Group C2: normal saline 0.15ml/kg+ intralipid 0.1ml/kg; Group DP1 or Group DP2: dexmedetomidine 0.6μg/kg +propofol 1mg/kg. 1 min after receiving drugs mentioned before, patients in Group C1 or Group DP1 received i.v. fentanyl (4μg/kg) and patients in Group C2 or Group DP2 received i.v. sufentanil (0.5μg/kg). After fentanyl administration,the onset time and the severity of cough for 1 min were recorded. Severity of coughing was graded as mild (1-2), moderate (3-5) and severe (>5) based on the number of coughs. Induction of general anesthesia was continued with sufficient propofol and vecuronium 0.12mg/kg, then tracheal intubation was performed by a practiced anesthesiologist. BP and HR were recorded before infusion(T0), before intubation(T1) and after intubation(T2). Results The incidence of coughing was higher in Group C1 (20/50; 40%) or Group C2 (12/50; 24%) than in Group DP1 (0/50; P<0.01) or Group DP2 (0/50; P<0.01). However, no difference in the severity of cough between Group C1 and Group C2.(P>0.05). Compared with Group C1-2, SBP and DBP of Group DP1-2 was significantly increased in T1, but HR decreased significantly in T1-2(P<0.01); Compared with T0,SBP and DBP of four groups decreased significantly in T1, and HR of Group DP 1-2 decreased significantly in T2 (P<0.01); Compared with T1, HR of Group C1-2 increased significantly(P<0.01). Conclusion Pretreatment dexmedetomidine-propofol could completely suppress the response of cough by equipotent boluses of fentanyl and sufentanil, and the hemodynamics during general anesthesia induction and tracheal intubation were more stabler.

Key words: Dexmedetomidine; Propofol; Fentanyl; Sufentanil; Cough