国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2014, Issue (2): 10-10
    
Sugammadex和新斯的明对氨基甾体类肌松药诱导肌肉松弛的拮抗效果和安全性的系统评价
蒋卫光, 崔常雷, 韩树海1()
1.吉林大学白求恩第一医院
Efficacy and Safety of Sugammadex versus Neostigmine on Reversal of Amino-steroidal Muscle Relaxtants Induced Neuromuscular Block: A Systematic Review
 全文:
摘要:

目的 系统评价Sugammadex和新斯的明对氨基甾体类肌松药诱导肌肉松弛的拮抗效果和不良反应。方法 计算机检索PubMed、EBSCO、Springer、Ovid、Embase、Cochrane Library和CNKI、万方数据库,检索起止时间为从建库至2013年6月。收集Sugammadex和新斯的明用于拮抗肌肉松弛的随机对照试验(RCT),由2位研究者对纳入研究进行资料提取和质量评价后,采用RevMan5.2软件进行Meta分析。结果 纳入6个RCT,包括533例患者。Meta分析: 无论是中度还是深度神经肌肉阻滞,Sugammadex组TOF值恢复到70%、80%和90%的平均时间明显快于新斯的明组(P<0.05)。同时Sugammadex组患者发生药物相关不良反应的概率小于新斯的明组(P<0.05)。结论 在中度和深度神经肌肉阻滞情况下,和新斯的明组相比,Sugammadex组对氨基甾体类肌松药诱导肌肉松弛的拮抗效果更强,并且安全性更高。

关键词: Sugammadex;新斯的明;神经肌肉阻滞;系统评价;Meta分析
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effect of sugammadex versus neostigmine on reversal of amino-steroidal muscle relaxants induced neuromuscular block. Methods The relevant randomized controlled trials(RCTs) were searched in PubMed、EBSCO、Springer、Ovid、Embase、Cochrane Library、CNKI and WanFang Data from the data of their establishment to June 2013. The quality of the included studies was evaluated after the data were extracted by two reviewers independently, and then the Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software. Result Six RCTs involving 533 cases were included. The mean time to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.7、0.8 and 0.9 was significantly faster with sugammadex compared with neostigmine, regardless of moderate and deep neuromuscular blockade. Compared with neostigmine group, the percentage of drug-related adverse effect in patients was decreased in sugammadex group. Conclusion Both in moderate and deep neuromuscular blockade, the efficacy of sugammadex on reversal of amino-steroidal muscle relaxants induced neuromuscular block was much stronger than neostigmine, and more security than neostigmine.

Key words: Sugammadex;neostigmine; neuromuscular block; Systematic Review; Meta-analysis