国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2014, Issue (8): 7-7
    
股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞麻醉在老年患者单侧下肢手术中的应用
胡振伐, 田鸣1()
1.北京燕化医院麻醉科
Application of femoral and sciatic nerve block anesthesia in unilateral lower limb surgery in elderly patients
 全文:
摘要:

目的 观察股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞麻醉用于老年患者单侧下肢手术的麻醉效果。 方法 60例行下肢手术的老年患者,年龄60岁~80岁,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅲ级,按随机数字表法分为A、B两组,每组30例。A组采用外周神经刺激仪定位,分别于股神经、坐骨神经处注入0.5%罗哌卡因30 ml;B组于L2~3或L3~4间隙穿刺,向蛛网膜下腔注入0.5%罗哌卡因2 ml,硬膜外向头端置管4 cm。观察并记录两组患者麻醉前(T0)和麻醉后15(T1)、30(T2)、45(T3)、60 min(T4)时的收缩压(systolic blood pressure, SBP)、舒张压(diastolic blood pressure, DBP)、平均动脉压(mean artery pressure, MAP)、心率(heart rate, HR)和脉搏血氧饱和度(pulse oxygen saturation, SpO2),记录两组的麻醉效果和副作用发生情况。 结果 麻醉前两组患者的SBP、DBP、MAP、HR和SpO2的比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);与T0比较,A组T1时的MAP无明显变化(P>0.05),而B组T1时的MAP从(96±8) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)降至(84±6) mmHg(P<0.01);同一时刻比较,B组T1时的MAP为(84±6) mmHg,明显低于A组(98±7) mmHg(P<0.01),两组麻醉前后HR和SpO2无明显变化(P>0.05);两组的麻醉效果均满意,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B组有12例尿潴留,5例恶心、呕吐,2例心动过缓,而A组只有1例患者发生心动过缓,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 股神经联合坐骨神经阻滞用于老年患者单侧下肢手术麻醉效果确切,血流动力学比较稳定,副作用少。

关键词: 股神经; 坐骨神经; 神经阻滞麻醉; 老年患者; 单侧下肢手术
Abstract:

Objective To observe the efficacy of femoral and sciatic nerve block in unilateral lower limb surgery in elderly patients. Methods Sixty ASAⅠ-Ⅲ patients aged 60 to 80 years, undergoing unilateral lower limb surgery were randomly divided into two groups(n=30). In group A, the femoral and sciatic nerve was identified and blocked with 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine respectively guided with peripheral nerve stimulator. In group B, subarachnoid anesthesia was performed with 2 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine injected at spinal interspaces L2-3 or L3-4 before an epidural catheter was inserted for anesthesia maintenance. Blood pressure,heart rate and pulse oxygen saturation were monitored before anesthesia(T0) and 15(T1), 30(T2), 45(T3), 60 min(T4) after anesthesia. The effectiveness of anesthesia and the incidence of adverse reactions were observed in both groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in mean artery pressure(MAP) before anesthesia,while in group B, the MAP were decreased from (96±8) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) to (84±6) mmHg(P<0.01) at 15 min after anesthesia compaired to preanesthesia. The MAP in group A were(98±7) mmHg while(84±6) mmHg in group B(P<0.01) at 15 min after anesthesia and that at 30, 45 min after induction was also decreased(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the analgesia effects between the two groups. The incidence of adverse events (urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, etc.) was higher in group B(P<0.05). Conclusions Femoral and sciatic nerve block is a safe and efficient technique with more stable hemodynamic status and less adverse events in elderly patients undergoing unilateral lower limb surgery.

Key words: Femoral nerve; Sciatic nerve; Nerve block anesthesia; Elderly patients; Unilateral lower limb surgery