国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2016, Issue (2): 8-8
    
舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡因用于下腹部手术后硬膜外自控镇痛
高福寅1()
1.山东省巨野县人民医院
The effect of sufentanil combined with ropivacaine by patient-controlled epidural analgesia for patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery
 全文:
摘要:

目的 观察舒芬太尼复合罗哌卡因用于下腹部手术后患者硬膜外自控镇痛(patient-controlled epidural analgesia,PCEA)的效果。 方法 下腹部择期手术120例,年龄28~66岁,ASA分级Ⅰ、Ⅱ级,应用随机数字表法分为3组(每组40例):0.5 mg/L舒芬太尼复合0.2% 罗哌卡因组(Ⅰ组)、5 mg/L芬太尼复合0.2%罗哌卡因组(Ⅱ组)和0.2% 罗哌卡因组(Ⅲ组)。所有患者术后镇痛均采用PCEA模式,观察镇痛后4、8、16、24、48 h的MAP、HR、VAS评分和Ramsay镇静评分(ramsay sedation score, RSS)情况,并记录48 h内镇痛泵总按压次数以及恶心、呕吐、皮肤瘙痒及呼吸抑制的发生率。 结果 各时点Ⅰ组VAS评分 [(1.4±0.4)、(1.6±0.5)、(1.5±0.4)、(1.6±0.3)、(1.3±0.3) 分]和Ⅱ组VAS评分[(1.5±0.6)、(1.6±0.4)、(1.7±0.6)、(1.5±0.4)、(1.4±0.6) 分]明显低于Ⅲ组[(2.1±0.7)、(2.4±0.6)、(2.4±0.5)、(2.3±0.7)、(2.2±0.8) 分](P<0.05);在8、16、24 h,Ⅰ组RSS[(2.4±0.6)、(2.1±0.9)、(2.4±0.5) 分]高于Ⅱ组[(1.4±0.7)、(1.6±0.6)、(1.6±0.4) 分]和Ⅲ组RSS[(1.7±0.6)、(1.4±0.3)、(1.6±0.6)](P<0.05);Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组镇痛泵总按压次数与Ⅲ组比较,差异有统计学意义(分别为3、4、18次,P<0.05);Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组恶心呕吐的发生率高于Ⅲ组(分别为15%、12.5%、0,P<0.05);3组皆未发生呼吸抑制。 结论 0.5 mg/L舒芬太尼配伍0.2%罗哌卡因用于下腹部手术后PCEA效果确切,且副作用发生率低。

关键词: 舒芬太尼; 罗哌卡因; 硬膜外镇痛; 患者自控镇痛
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of sufentanil combined with ropivacaine by patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Methods One hundred and twenty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 28-66 years old, undergoing lower abdominal operation, were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=40): 0.5 mg/L sufentanil combined with 0.2% ropivacaine (group Ⅰ), 5 mg/L fentanyl combined with 0.2% ropivacaine (groupⅡ), and 0.2% ropivacaine (group Ⅲ). MAP, HR, VAS, and ramsay sedation score(RSS) were recorded at 4, 8, 16, 24, 48 h after the start of PCEA. The number of total presses of PCEA and side effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and respiratory depression were recorded at 48 h. Results There were no differences in age, sex, and weight among three groups (P>0.05). The VAS in group Ⅰ[(1.4±0.4), (1.6±0.5), (1.5±0.4), (1.6±0.3), (1.3±0.3)] and group Ⅱ[(1.5±0.6), (1.6±0.4), (1.7±0.6), (1.5±0.4), (1.4±0.6)] were significantly lower than that in group Ⅲ[(2.1±0.7), (2.4±0.6), (2.4±0.5), (2.3±0.7), (2.2±0.8)](P<0.05) at each time point, respectively. The RSS in group Ⅰ[(2.4±0.6), (2.1±0.9), (2.4±0.5)] was significantly higher than that in group Ⅱ[(1.4±0.7), (1.6±0.6), (1.6±0.4)] and group Ⅲ [(1.7±0.6), (1.4±0.3), (1.6±0.6)] (P<0.05) at 8, 16, 24 h, respectively. The number of total presses of PCEA decreased significantly in group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ, compared with group Ⅲ (3, 4, 18, P<0.05), respectivey. The incidences of nausea and vomiting in group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ were significantly higher than that in group Ⅲ(15%, 12.5%, 0, P<0.05), respectively. There is no occurrence of respiratory depression in all groups. Conclusions 0.5 mg/L sufentanil combined with 0.2% ropivacaine by PCEA was safe and effective for patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery.

Key words: Sufentanil; Ropivacaine; Epidural analgesia; Patient-controlled analgesia