国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2016, Issue (1): 5-5
    
地佐辛和舒芬太尼用于老年患者宫腔镜取环术临床比较
纪伟, 孔亮, 孟秀荣, 李德刚1()
1.北京市昌平区中医医院
The clinic comparison of dezocine and sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine device
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较地佐辛和舒芬太尼在老年患者行宫腔镜取环术中的应用效果。 方法 选择拟行宫腔镜取环术患者40例,按照完全随机法均分为地佐辛组(D组)和舒芬太尼组(S组),每组20例。记录患者入室后(T0)、麻醉诱导后1 min(T1)、扩宫颈时(T2)、手术结束时(T3)、苏醒时(T4)的MAP、HR、SpO2和呼吸频率(respiratory, RR);观察患者术中呼吸抑制(SpO2<90%或呼吸暂停>15 s)、丙泊酚用药量、术毕呼之睁眼时间、定向力恢复时间和恶心呕吐、头晕等副作用的发生率以及术后疼痛情况。 结果 T1时D组MAP和SpO2[(77±4) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)和(96.3±1.3)%]高于S组[(72±4) mmHg和(93.6±1.5)%](P<0.05);HR和RR[(65±5) 次/min和(14.6±1.3) 次/min]快于S组[(61±5) 次/min和(12.4±1.6) 次/min](P<0.05)。T2时D组HR[(72±4) 次/min]快于S组[(66±5) 次/min](P<0.05)。D组呼之睁眼时间和定向力恢复时间[(3.6±1.2) min和(5.5±1.7) min]明显短于S组[(5.5±0.9) min和(7.4±1.4) min](P<0.05);D组呼吸抑制发生率(5%)显著低于S组(15%)(P<0.05)。 结论 在老年患者宫腔镜取环术中,地佐辛较舒芬太尼麻醉呼吸抑制轻,血流动力学更平稳,且可明显缩短患者苏醒时间及定向力恢复时间,提高患者的舒适度。

关键词: 地佐辛; 舒芬太尼; 老年患者; 静脉麻醉; 宫腔镜取环术
Abstract:

Objective To observe and compare the clinical application effect of dezocine and sufentanil in elderly patients, who were undergoing hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine device. Methods Forty patients undergoing hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine device were randomly divided into dezocine group(group D) and sufentanil group (group S)(n=20). MAP, HR, SpO2, respiratory(RR) were monitored after entering the operation room(T0), 1 min after anesthesia (T1), the dilation of uterine cervix (T2), the end of operation(T3), anesthesia recovery (T4). Respiratory depression(SpO2<90% or apnea time>15 s), propofol dosage, the patients' eye opening time under calling after surgery, the recovery time of orientation, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, dizziness and other adverse reaction were observed in both groups. Results Comparations between the two groups showed that MAP[(77±4) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)] and SpO2[(96.3±1.3)%] at 1 min after anesthesia in group D were higher than that in group S [(72±4) mmHg and (93.6±1.5)%](P<0.05), while HR [(65±5) bpm] and RR [(14.6±1.3) bpm] were significantly more than that in group S [(61±5) bpm and (12.4±1.6) bpm] (P<0.05). HR[(72±4) bpm] at the dilation of uterine cervix in group D was significantly more than that in group S[(66±5) bpm](P<0.05). The patients' eye opening time under calling after surgery[(3.6±1.2) min] and the recovery time of orientation [(5.5±1.7) min] in group D were significantly shorter than that in group S[(5.5±0.9) min and(7.4±1.4) min](P<0.05), while the incidence of depression(5%) were significantly lower than that in group S(15%)(P<0.05). Conclusions Compared to sufentanil, dezocine is a safe and effecient narcotic with much lighter incidence of respiratory depression, more stable hemodynamics status, and much shorter recovery time of anesthesia and orientation, more comfortabe in elderly patients undergoing hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine device.

Key words: Dezocine; Sufentanil; Elderly patients; Intravenous anesthesia; Hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine device