国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2016, Issue (1): 3-3
    
瑞芬太尼、舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚静脉靶控麻醉在脑外科手术中的疗效分析对血清应激相关激素水平的影响
金春姬, 邹吉贺1()
1.沈阳市军区总医院
Remifentanil-propofol versus sufentanil-propofol during total intravenous anesthesia for neurosurgery and stress related hormones of serum levels influence
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼分别复合丙泊酚静脉靶控麻醉在脑外科手术中的麻醉效果,并比较分析两种麻醉方法对血流动力学、血浆内分泌激素水平的影响。 方法 按照随机数字表法将108例脑外科手术患者分为瑞芬太尼组(瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉)和舒芬太尼组(舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉),每组54例。比较两组患者监测诱导前(T0)、插管时(T1)、插管后l min(T2)、插管后5 min(T3)、拔管时(T4)的血流动力学变化,采用放射免疫法检测两组患者T0~T4时间点的血浆内分泌激素变化[血清去甲肾上腺(norepinephrine, NE)、血浆血管紧张素Ⅱ(plasma angiotensin Ⅱ, AngⅡ)、血浆肾素活性(plasma renin activity, PRA)、醛固酮(aldosterone, ALD)水平]以及麻醉恢复情况、副作用。 结果 与T0比较,两组患者在T1~T4各时间点SBP、DBP、HR、SpO2等指标均下降(P<0.01);舒芬太尼组患者在T1~T4各时间点SBP、DBP、HR、SpO2等指标均高于瑞芬太尼组(P<0.01)。与T0比较,瑞芬太尼组患者在T1~T4各时间点NE、AngⅡ、PRA、ALD水平均显著升高(P<0.01)。与T0比较,舒芬太尼组患者T2~T4各时间点NE、ALD水平升高(P<0.05),而AngⅡ及PRA水平略有升高,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者在T2~T4 各时间点NE水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组患者T1~T4各时间点AngⅡ及PRA水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组患者T3~T4各时间点ALD水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。瑞芬太尼组患者自主呼吸恢复时间[(6.2±1.6) min]、睁眼时间[(7.1±1.8) min]、意识清醒时间[(13.7±2.4) min]以及拔管时间[(6.3±0.8) min]均短于舒芬太尼组患者(P<0.01)。两组患者均未发生明显严重并发症。 结论 与瑞芬太尼比较,舒芬太尼可减轻脑外科手术患者心血管应激反应,且血流动力学指标优于瑞芬太尼组,但瑞芬太尼具有良好的麻醉效果,术后患者苏醒快、自主呼吸早、拔管时间短。

关键词: 舒芬太尼; 瑞芬太尼; 丙泊酚; 颅脑手术; 血流动力学; 应激激素
Abstract:

Objective To compare the effects of remifentanil-propofol and sufentanil-propofol target-controlled intravenous anesthesia in brain surgery, and their respective influences on hemodynamics and plasma hormone levels. Methods According to the random number table, One hundred and eight patients elective for brain surgery were randomly divided into remifentanil group(remifentanil-propofol) and sufentanil group(sufentanil-propofol), n=54. The hemodynamic changes of two groups were compared at the following five time points: before induction(T0), intubation(T1), 1 min after intubation(T2), 5 min after intubation(T3), extubation(T4). The plasma hormone levels at each point, including serum norepinephrine (NE), plasma angiotensin Ⅱ(AngⅡ), plasma renin activity(PRA)and aldosterone(ALD) were detected by radioimmunoassay. We observed anesthesia recovery and adverse reactions at the same time. Results Compared with T0 , SBP, DBP, HR, SpO2 and other indicators of two groups during T1-T4 were all significantly decreased(P<0.01), and the data of sufentanil group higher than those remfentanil group(P<0.01). Compared with T0, during T1-T4, NE, AngII, PRA and ALD in remifentanil group significantly increased(P<0.01). Compared with T0, during T2-T4, NE and ALD in sufentanil group significantly increased(P<0.05), while AngⅡ and PRA slightly increased, and the latter difference was not statistically significance (P>0.05). During T2-T4, NE levels in two groups were significantly different(P<0.01), during T1-T4, AngⅡ and PRA levels in two groups were significantly different(P<0.01), during T3-T4, ALD levels in two groups were significantly different(P<0.05). In remifentanil group, spontaneous breathing recovery time[(6.2±1.6) min], opening eyes time[(7.1±1.8) min], conscious time[(13.7±2.4) min] and extubation time[(6.3±0.8) min] were significantly shorter than sufentanil group(P<0.05). No serious complications occurred in both groups. Conclusions Compared with remifentanil, sufentanil can reduce cardiovascular stress response in patients undergoing brain surgery and obtained better hemodynamic indicators. But remifentanil can get a good induction effect with quick recovery, self-breathing, and a short time of extubation.

Key words: Sufentanil; Remifentanil; Propofol; Skull operation; Hemodynamics; Stress hormones