国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2017, Issue (7): 3-3
    
连续收肌管阻滞和连续股神经阻滞对膝关节置换术患者术后镇痛和早期功能康复的影响
孔宪刚, 宋成伟, 侯代亮, 王 昆, 李成文1()
1.山东省济宁市第一人民医院
Effect of continuous adductor canal or femoral nerve block on pain relief and early rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较连续收肌管阻滞(adductor canal block, ACB)和连续股神经阻滞(femoral nerve block, FNB)在膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty, TKA)患者术后镇痛的效果和对早期功能康复的影响。 方法 择期拟行单侧TKA患者60例,采用随机数字表法分为两组(每组30例):连续ACB组(A组)和连续FNB组(F组)。术中采用全凭静脉麻醉。两组在麻醉诱导前分别行超声引导下ACB和FNB,并放置神经周围导管。术毕经神经周围导管予0.2%罗哌卡因实施患者自控周围神经阻滞镇痛。记录术后4、8、12、24、48 h静息和运动(膝关节被动屈曲45°)疼痛数字评分(numeric rating scale,NRS)、患肢股四头肌肌力Lovett评分和患肢运动阻滞改良Bromage评分。记录:术后1、2、3、14 d膝关节最大主动/被动活动度,术后14 d美国纽约特种外科医院(hospital for special surgery, HSS)膝关节功能评分,术后第1次下床活动时间和术后膝关节主动屈膝90°时间。记录术后48 h内镇痛泵有效按压次数和补救镇痛率。 结果 两组术后静息和运动NRS评分、镇痛泵有效按压次数和补救镇痛率等比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组术后12 h内患肢股四头肌肌力Lovett评分明显高于F组(P<0.05)、患肢运动阻滞改良Bromage评分明显低于F组(P<0.05)。A组术后1、2、3 d膝关节最大主动活动度明显大于F组(P<0.05),但膝关节最大被动活动度、术后14 d膝关节最大主动活动度、术后14 d膝关节HSS评分以及术后第1次下床活动时间和术后膝关节主动屈曲90°时间两组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 连续ACB和连续FNB可为TKA患者提供等同的术后镇痛效果,而且对早期功能康复具有相似的效果。

关键词: 收肌管阻滞; 股神经阻滞; 全膝关节置换术; 术后镇痛; 康复
Abstract:

Objective To compare the analgesic effect of continuous adductor canal block(ACB) and continuous femoral nerve block(FNB) after total knee arthroplasty(TKA). Methods Sixty patients scheduled for unilateral TKA were randomly assigned into two groups, receiving continuous ACB(group A) or continuous FNB(group F). Intravenous anesthesia was applied throughout the operation. The adductor canal and the femoral nerve were catheterized for block under the guidance of sonography before induction of general anesthesia. Patient-controlled analgesia was provided immediately after surgery with 0.2% ropivacaine through the perineural catheter. The pain severity at rest and upon movement (passive knee flexion of 45 degrees) with a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), the Lovett score of muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris, and the modified Bromage score of the motor block of the affected extremity were assessed 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 h after surgery. The maximal range of active/passive motion of the knee joint was recorded 1, 2, 3, 14 d after surgery. The number of effective patient-controlled bolus of ropivacaine and the number of need for opioid rescue within 48 h after surgery, the first time of out-of-bed activity, the time of active knee flexion reaching 90 degrees, and the hospital for special surgery(HSS) score of knee function 14 d after surgery were also recorded. Results There was no difference between group A and group F in terms of the NRS scores at rest and upon movement, the number of effective patient-controlled bolus of ropivacaine and the number of need for opioid rescue (P>0.05). Patients in group A had a higher Lovett score of muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris and a lower modified Bromage score of the motor block than those in group F within 12 h after surgery (P<0.05). The maximal range of active motion of the knee joint 1, 2, 3 d after surgery was larger in group A than that in group F(P<0.05). No significantdifference was observed between two groups regarding the maximal range of passive motion of the knee joint, the maximal range of active motion of the knee joint and the HSS score of knee function 14 d after surgery, the first time of out-of-bed activity and the time of active knee flexion of 90 degree(P>0.05). Conclusions An equal postoperative analgesic efficacy was observed in patients receiving continuous ACB and continuous FNB. Furthermore, continuous ACB did not provide a superior effect on early rehabilitation than continuous FNB.

Key words: Adductor canal block; Femoral nerve block; Total knee arthroplasty; Postoperative analgesia; Rehabilitation