国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2018, Issue (4): 0-0
    
不同类型胎盘植入产妇的麻醉管理对母婴预后的影响
包菊, 曲元1()
1.北京大学第一医院
Effects of anesthesia management on maternal and fetal prognosis in patients complicated with different types of placenta implantation
 全文:
摘要:

目的 研究不同类型胎盘植入产妇的麻醉管理对母婴预后的影响。 方法 通过电子病历系统查询北京大学第一医院2009年至2017年期间出院诊断为“胎盘植入”的病例,剔除自然流产、人工流产及剖宫取胎的病例,最终82例患者纳入到本次研究中。根据胎盘植入程度分为粘连型、植入型、穿透型3组,分析产妇的麻醉管理及母婴预后。 结果 82例患者中粘连组41例、植入组20例、穿透组21例。不同类型植入的麻醉方式选择差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),其中粘连组34例(82.9%)行椎管内麻醉,6例(14.6%)行全身麻醉,1例(2.4%)先行椎管内麻醉后术中转为全身麻醉;植入组11例(55%) 行椎管内麻醉,6例(30%)行全身麻醉,3 例(15%)先行椎管内麻醉后术中转为全身麻醉;穿透组2 例(9.5%)行椎管内麻醉,12例(57.1%)行全身麻醉,7例(33.3%)先行椎管内麻醉后术中转为全身麻醉。胎盘植入程度越重,出血量越多,产妇子宫切除率越高,新生儿1分钟Apgar评分越低,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。 结论 胎盘植入程度是麻醉管理的重要决定因素。胎盘植入程度轻者,椎管内麻醉作为首选麻醉方式,穿透型植入并术前预先放置腹主动脉球囊导管的产妇,应首选全身麻醉。胎盘植入程度对新生儿APGAR氏评分及出血量密切相关。高质量的麻醉管理及措施可以显著改善母婴预后。

关键词: 胎盘植入;剖宫产术;麻醉;
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of anesthesia management on maternal and fetal prognosis in patients complicated with different types of placenta implantation. Methods A retrospective case review of the patients with placenta implantation between 2009 and 2017 at Peking University First Hospital was conducted in the electronic medical record system, excluding natural birth and artificial abortion, a total of 82 cases were incorporated into this study. According to the degree of implantation, they were divided into three groups: accreta group, increta group and percreta group. We analyzed the anesthesia management and maternal and fetal prognosis. Results The accrete group included 41 cases, the increta group 20 cases and the percreta group 21 cases. There were significant differences among the three groups in anesthetic choices (P<0.01).In the accreta group, 34 cases (82.9%) underwent spinal anesthesia, 6 cases (14.6%) underwent general anesthesia, and 1 case(2.4% ) was converted to general anesthesia after spinal anesthesia during the operation; in the increta group, 11 cases (55%) underwent spinal anesthesia, 6 cases (30%) underwent general anesthesia, and 3 cases (15%) were converted to general anesthesia after spinal anesthesia; in the percreta group, 2 cases (9.5%) underwent spinal anesthesia, 12 cases (57.1%) underwent general anesthesia, and 7 cases (33.3%) were converted to general anesthesia after spinal anesthesia. The greater the degree of placental implantation, the blood loss was more, the hysterectomy rate of the patient was the higher and 1 minute Apgar score for the newborn was lower. Conclusions Placental implantation is an important determinant of anesthesia management. Spinal anesthesia can be used as the first choice of cesarean section complicated with placenta accreta and general anesthesia should be considered in placenta percreta, especially those who have already placed abdominal aortic balloon catheters. High quality anesthesia manaement and measures can significantly improve maternal and fetal prognosis.

Key words: Placenta implantation; Cesarean section; Anesthesia