国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2018, Issue (4): 0-0
    
智能自控镇痛泵用于分娩镇痛的临床研究
白云波, 徐铭军, 车向明, 赵国胜, 韩斌1()
1.首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院
The clinical research of the Intelligent patient-control analgesia pump for labor analgesia
 全文:
摘要:

【摘要】 目的 评价智能自控镇痛泵用于分娩镇痛的临床效果及对母婴的影响。方法 选择要求分娩镇痛的初产妇120例,随机分为两组:智能自控镇痛泵组(I组,n=60)和传统自控镇痛泵组(T组,n=60),两组均采用硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛,首剂量给予0.1%罗哌卡因+0.5μg/ml舒芬太尼混合液12ml,镇痛起效后,I组和T组分别应用智能自控镇痛泵和传统自控镇痛泵进行分娩镇痛。两种自控镇痛泵基本参数设置为:背景剂量5ml/h,PCA剂量5ml,锁定时间15min。智能自控镇痛泵特有的参数设置:评估时间1h,按压低限0次,按压高限3次,调整剂量5ml/h,小时限量30ml。智能自控镇痛泵每1小时评估一次,若产妇按压次数为0,则下一小时背景剂量减少5ml,最小背景速度以0.1ml/h输注;若产妇按压次数为1、2,则下一小时背景剂量不变;若产妇按压次数大于等于3,则下一小时背景剂量增加5ml,每小时镇痛药物极限量为30ml。两组均于第二产程结束后关闭镇痛泵。记录镇痛药物用量,爆发痛情况,母体分娩过程中各时点的VAS评分,改良Bromage评分,各产程时间,分娩方式,新生儿情况,镇痛不良反应和产妇满意度等。 结果 最终纳入产妇113例,I组57例,T组56例。与T组比较,I组爆发痛发生率和宫口开全时VAS评分降低(P<0.05),I组镇痛满意度和第二产程用力分娩时背景输注速率增加(P<0.05),但并没有增加第二产程时间;产妇镇痛药物用药量、分娩方式、产程时间、新生儿情况和镇痛不良反应两组差异均无统计学意义。结论 能自控镇痛泵的给药模式用于分娩镇痛效果确切,爆发痛发生率降低且镇痛药物用量并没有增加,没有增加不良反应,产妇满意度高,对母婴是安全的。

关键词: 镇痛,产科;智能自控镇痛泵;传统自控镇痛泵
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of the intelligent patient-control analgesia pump for labor analgesia and its influence on mother and fetus. Methods 120 primiparas were randomly divided into two groups, intelligent patient-control analgesia pump group(Group I,n=60) and traditional patient-control analgesia pump group (Group T, n=60). All of them received epidural analgesia, and the analgesic solution was 0.1% ropivacaine plus 0.5μg/ml sufentanil. Both groups received an initial bolus of 12ml analgesic solution, and the basic pump settings for the two groups were 5ml/h, 5ml, 15min (basal infusion rate, bolus dose and lock time) . Furthermore, the advanced settings in the group I were as follows: if the parturient required 0 bolus demand in the previous hour, the basal infusion rate was decreased by 5ml/h automatically; if the parturient required 1 or 2 bolus demands in the previous hour, the basal infusion rate was maintained; if the parturient required more than 2 bolus demands in the previous hour, the basal infusion rate was increased by 5ml/h automatically; and the max permissible analgesic solution volume was limited to 30ml per hour. The pump was ended at the end of the second stage of labor. The follow outcome measures, including the usage of analgesics, the number of breakthrough pain, the VAS scores, the Modified Bromage score, the duration of labor, delivery mode, neonate condition, side-effects as well as the maternal satisfaction, were recorded. Results Finally, we analyzed 113 parturient (57 in group I and 56 in group T). Compared with group T, in the group I, the VAS score at full cervical dilatation and the incidence of breakthrough pain were significantly decreased (P < 0.05); meanwhile, the basal infusion rate at the second stage of labor force delivery and the maternal satisfaction were significantly increased (P < 0.05) without prolonged process of the second stage of labor; and no significant differences were found in the usage of analgesics, the duration of labor, delivery mode, the neonate condition as well as the side-effects. Conclusion The intelligent patient-control analgesia pump is effective for labor analgesia. It provides lower incidence of breakthrough pain and higher maternal satisfaction. the dosage of analgesics and side-effects do not increase.The intelligent patient-control analgesia pump is safe for mother and fetus.

Key words: Analgesia,obstetrical;The intelligent patient-control analgesia pump;The traditional patient-control analgesia pump