国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2019, Issue (4): 0-0
    
缺血预处理对全膝关节置换术患者早期康复的影响
张海龙, 赵丽琴, 吴迪, 刘亮1()
1.首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院
Effects of ischemic preconditioning on the early recovery in patients after total knee arthroplasty
 全文:
摘要:

目的 评价缺血预处理(ischemic preconditioning, IPC)对全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty, TKA) 患者早期康复的影响。 方法 择期全身麻醉下行初次单侧TKA患者40例,ASA分级Ⅰ、Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法将患者分为IPC组(I组)和对照组(C组),每组20例。I组于麻醉诱导后将止血带充气,实施3个周期的缺血5 min再灌注5 min;C组不做任何处理。术毕行患者自控静脉镇痛(patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, PCIA)。镇痛药物为舒芬太尼4 μg/kg+托烷司琼12 mg加生理盐水稀释至200 ml,背景输注速率2 ml/h,单次剂量0.5 ml,锁定时间15 min,持续镇痛72 h。采用舒芬太尼进行补救镇痛,维持VAS评分≤3分。记录两组患者术后12、24、48、72 h的VAS评分,记录72 h内的镇痛泵总按压次数和有效按压次数,记录72 h内的舒芬太尼使用情况,并计算人均舒芬太尼用量及补救药物用药率,记录术后72 h时患者对镇痛的总体满意度评分,记录两组患者术后1、3、7、14 d直腿抬高度数、膝关节自主活动度。 结果 两组患者术后12、24、48、72 h VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与C组比较,I组PCIA总按压次数和有效按压次数减少、人均舒芬太尼用量及补救药物用药率降低(P<0.05),患者对镇痛总体满意度评分升高(P<0.05),术后呕吐发生率降低(P<0.05);与C组比较,I组术后1、3、7 d直腿抬高度数及术后1、3、7、14 d膝关节自主活动度均显著升高(P<0.05),术后14 d直腿抬高度数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 IPC可减轻TKA手术患者术后疼痛,促进膝关节功能恢复,显著提高患者早期康复质量。

关键词: 缺血预处理; 再灌注损伤; 膝关节; 人工关节置换术
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) on the early recovery of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A total of 40 patients [American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) Stage Ⅰ, Ⅱ] initially undergoing unilateral TKA after general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups (n=20): an IPC group (group I) and a control group (group C). Group I underwent three cycles of 5 min ischemia/5 min reperfusion after induction of anesthesia, while group C received no treatment. After surgery, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was performed, with 4 μg/kg sufentanil and 12 mg tropisetron in normal saline to 200 ml, at a background infusion rate of 2 ml/h. The PCA pump was set up with a bolus dose of 0.5 ml within a lockout interval of 15 min for 72 h. Sufentanil was used for rescue analgesia to maintain the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score≤3. The VAS scores of both groups were recorded 12, 24, 48 h and 72 h after surgery. The numbers of attempts and successful press times within 72 h were recorded. The use of sufentanil within 72 h was recorded, while the per capita dose of sufentanil and rescue analgesia rate was calculated. The scores of patient satisfaction 72 h after operation was recorded, while the number of straight leg raise and the range of spontaneous activity 1, 3, 7, 14 d after surgery were also recorded. Results No significant differences were detected in VAS between the two groups 12, 24, 48 h and 72 h after surgery (P>0.05). Compared with group C, group I presented remarkable decreases in the numbers of attempts and successful delivered doses, the average sufentanil dose and rescue analgesia rate (P<0.05), marked increased patient satisfaction scores (P<0.05) and reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P<0.05). Compared with group C, group I presented remarkable increases in the number of straight leg raise 1, 3, 7 d after surgery and the range of spontaneous activity 1, 3, 7, 14 d after surgery (P<0.05) , despite no significant differences were detected between the two groups in the straight leg raise 14 d after surgery (P>0.05). Conclusions IPC can effectively relieve postoperative pain and promote knee functional recovery, so as to improve early recovery quality.

Key words: Ischemic preconditioning; Reperfusion injury; Knee joint; Artificial joint replacement