国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2019, Issue (7): 0-0
    
改良胸部神经阻滞联合全身麻醉在乳腺癌手术中的应用
梁小女, 孙建宏, 张建友, 李士通, 张凤霞1()
1.扬州大学附属医院
Application of modified thoracic nerve block combined with general anesthesia in radical mastectomy
 全文:
摘要:

目的 研究改良胸部神经阻滞,即胸横肌平面?蛳胸神经(transversus thoracic muscle plane?蛳pectoral nerves, TTP?蛳PECS)阻滞联合全身麻醉在乳腺癌改良根治术中的麻醉及镇痛效果。 方法 采用随机数字表法将行乳腺癌改良根治术的66例患者分为3组(每组22例):TTP?蛳PECS阻滞联合全身麻醉组(PG组)、胸椎旁阻滞(thoracic paravertebral blockade, TPVB)联合全身麻醉组(TG组)、单纯全身麻醉组(G组)。观察手术进行到不同部位时患者的心率和MAP,记录术中和术后镇痛药的消耗量及麻醉恢复期的VAS评分及Ramsay镇静评分等,对比术后患者胃肠道功能恢复情况。 结果 术中PG组患者的MAP和心率较G组和TG组更为平稳。与G组比较,PG组和TG组术中舒芬太尼的消耗量明显减少(P<0.05),术后患者排气时间明显缩短,术后恶心呕吐的发生率明显下降(P<0.05),术后30 min到术后24 h VAS评分明显下降(P<0.05)。PG组和TG组患者的舒芬太尼消耗量、排气时间、术后恶心呕吐的发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但PG组患者术后VAS评分更低,尤其是术毕即刻的VAS评分(P<0.05)。 结论 TTP?蛳PECS阻滞联合全身麻醉可以安全、有效地用于乳腺癌改良根治术,不仅可以显著减少术中舒芬太尼的需要量,获得更平稳的血流动力学改变,而且能够降低术后并发症的发生率,提高麻醉及镇痛效果。

关键词: 胸横肌平面; 胸神经阻滞; 胸椎旁阻滞; 全身麻醉; 乳腺癌
Abstract:

Objective  To study the anesthesia and analgesic effect of modified thoracic nerve block(transversus thoracic muscle plane-pectoral nerves block) combined with general anesthesia in radical mastectomy. Methods A total of sixty-six patients who underwent radical mastectomy were randomly divided into three groups (22 cases in each group) by random number table: transversus thoracic muscle plane combined with pectoral nerves block group (group PG), thoracic paravertebral blockade group (group TG) and control group (group G). All patients in three groups were also anesthetized by general anesthesia. The blood pressure, heart rate and the consumption of opioids were recorded in the operation. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS), Ramsay sedation score and the recovery of bowel function were evaluated in the post-operation. Results Intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate of patients in group PG were more stable than these indexes of patients in group G and group TG. Compared with patients in group G, the consumption of sufentanil was low in group PG and group TG (P<0.05). The recovery time of bowel function in group PG and group TG was significantly shorter than group G. The rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients of both group PG and group TG were less than the rates in patients of group G (P<0.05). Compared with group G, VAS scores in group PG and group TG decreased significantly from 30 minutes to 24 h after surgery (P<0.05). There were no differences in the consumption of sufentanil, the time of exhaust, the incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients of group PG and group TG (P>0.05), but the VAS score in group PG was lower, especially immediately after operation (P<0.05). Conclusions Modified thoracic nerve block combined with general anesthesia is safe and effective in radical mastectomy with low consumption of sufentanil, stable hemodynamic change and low incidence of postoperative complications.

Key words: Transversus thoracic muscle; Pectoral nerve block; Thoracic paravertebral blockade; General anesthesia; Radical mastectomy