国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2019, Issue (12): 0-0
    
远端缺血预处理对接受活体肝移植的胆道闭锁患儿预后的影响
齐波, 张松, 陈灵科, 李佩盈, 杨立群, 俞卫锋1()
1.苏州大学附属第三人民医院麻醉科;上海仁济医院
Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Pediatric Patient with Biliary Atresia Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation
 全文:
摘要:

[摘要] 目的 探讨远端缺血预处理(remote ischemic preconditioning,RIPC)是否可以改善胆道闭锁(biliary atresia, BA)小儿肝移植患者的缺血再灌注损伤(ischemia/reperfusion injury,IRI)和对患儿早期临床结局的影响。 方法 选择择期行活体肝移植术的的BA患儿90例,采用随机数字表法分成两组(每组45例):对照组(Control组)和远端缺血预处理组(RIPC组)。RIPC组患儿在开始手术前,将止血带绑于右下肢并充气至150 mmHg,持续5分钟,然后放气5分钟以重新灌注腿部,随后重复两次共三个循环。观察指标为患儿术前和术后2h,1d,3d的血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(aspartate aminotransferase, AST)水平以及主要并发症的发生情况,患儿ICU停留时间,总体住院天数,需要再次移植比例,30d的全因死亡率等的发生情况。 结果 两组患儿接受肝移植手术前,术后2h,1d,3d时,血清ALT, AST水平无显著差异。术后主要并发症的发生率差异均无统计学意义。尽管RIPC组患儿ICU停留时间,总体住院天数小于Control组,然而差异没有统计学意义。两组患儿术后1年的全因死亡率相比无差异。 结论 本实验条件下尚未观察到RIPC对接受肝移植的BA患儿有保护效果。延长随访期、增加评价指标,改变RIPC的参数将有助于明确RIPC在BA患儿肝移植过程中作用。

关键词: 胆道闭锁;肝移植;远端缺血预处理;缺血再灌注损伤
Abstract:

[Abstract] Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on graft function and clinical outcomes of pediatric patients with biliary atresia after living donor liver transplantation. Methods Ninety recipients undergoing living donor liver transplantation were randomized to RIPC or Control group. RIPC was induced through three 5 min cycles of alternate ischemia and reperfusion of the right leg prior to surgery. Graft function was assessed through evaluation of the serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) before surgery and at 1h, 1d and 3d after surgery. In addition, the incidences of acute cellular rejection, need of re-transplantation, and major complications; the length of stay in the intensive care unit, and the length of hospital stay; and the 1-year mortality were also investigated. Results No differences in ALT and AST levels at abovementioned timepoint were observed between the groups. Recipients in the preconditioning group spent shorter time in ICU postoperatively and in hospital, although this was not statistically significant. No other clinical benefits with respect to the complication rate, or short-term mortality were observed. Conclusions This study has not demonstrated evidence of a protective effects of RIPC on short-term measures of ischemia/reperfusion injury after liver transplantation. Longer follow up, detection of more sensitive makers and an altered preconditioning protocol will be required to determine the clinical efficacy of RIPC in this scenario.

Key words: Biliary atresia;Liver transplantation;Remote ischemic preconditioning;Ischemia/reperfusion injury