国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2020, Issue (8): 0-0
    
硬脊膜穿破硬膜外阻滞在分娩镇痛中的应用
晏明, 张玉凤, 崔恩惠, 丁松, 张浩, 孙剑1()
1.淮安市妇幼保健院
Application of dural puncture epidural in labor analgesia
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨硬脊膜穿破硬膜外分娩镇痛起效速度、阻滞质量和副作用等方面的价值。 方法 选取要求行分娩镇痛单胎头位足月初产妇662例,随机分配到蛛网膜下腔-硬膜外联合组(combined spinal epidural,CSE组)、硬脊膜穿破硬膜外组(dural puncture epidural,DPE组)和硬膜外组(epidural,EP组)。给药后前20分钟每隔2分钟记录一次疼痛NRS(numeric rating scales)评分,以患者到达NRS评分≤1的时间为主要指标。次要结果包括第一产程整体疼痛评分及宫口开全时疼痛评分、阻滞的质量、母体不良反应、子宫收缩情况、胎心变化情况以及新生儿Apgar评分。 结果 CSE组到达NPR≤1的速度快于DPE组(P0.05);DPE达到NPR≤1的速度快于EP组(P0.05)。三组达到NPR≤1的时间分别为,CSE组 2(2-6)min,DPE组10(6-12)min,EP组12(10-18)min。与EP组比较,DPE组宫口开全时疼痛评分(NRS2)降低,在20min时双侧S2阻滞、非对称性阻滞及医生补充干预发生率显著降低(P0.05)。与CSE组比较,DPE组Bromage运动评分≥1、瘙痒、低血压、宫缩过频、胎心减速和医生补充干预的发生率降低(P0.05)。 结论 硬膜穿破硬膜外镇痛起效快,镇痛效果好,不良反应发生率低,是一种安全有效的分娩镇痛方法。

关键词: 分娩镇痛;硬脊膜穿破硬膜外;硬膜外;腰硬联合
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the analgesia onset , block quality and side effects of dural puncture epidural technique for labor analgesia. Methods 662 primiparas with singleton, vertex presentation fetuses at 38 to 42 weeks’ gestation with spontaneous parturiton were selected. All patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: Combined spinal epidural group (CSE group), Dural puncture epidural(DPE group)and epidural group (EP group).In the first 20 minutes, numerical rating scale(NRS) score was recorded every 2 minutes to determine the time to reach NRS≤1,and this was the main outcome; Secondary outcomes included the verbal numeric pain rating scale(NPR),block quality,maternal side effects,uterine contractions patterns, changes of the fetal heart rate in the first and second stages of labor.The neonatal Apgar score was recored. Results The time of group C achieved NPR≤1 was shorter than group D and group D was shorter than group E(P0.05).The median times (interquartile range) to NPRS≤1 were 2 (2–6) minutes for CSE, 10 (6–12) minutes for DPE, and 12 (10–18) minutes for EP.Compared with group E, the numerical rating scale(NRS2) when the uterine neck whole opened, the incidence of bilateral S2 block, asymmetric block,and doctors' supplementary intervention were significantly lower at 20 minutes in group D(P0.05). Compared with group C, the incidence of Bromage score≥1, pruritus, hypotension, uterine contraction, the deceleration of fetal heart rate and doctor's supplementary intervention were significantly reduced in group D(P0.05). Conclusion Dural puncture epidural technique has rapid analgesia, better analgesic effect, and lower incidence of side effects. It is a safe and effective technique for labor analgesia.

Key words: Labor analgesia; Dura puncture epidural;Epidural;Spinal-epidural