国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2020, Issue (10): 4-4
    
基于计算机模拟概述创新性软药瑞马唑仑
管忍, 董希玮, 马宁, 张马忠1()
1.上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心麻醉科
Pharmacologic Overview of the Innovative Soft Drug Remimazolam Based on Computer Simulation
 全文:
摘要:

目的 新型超短效苯二氮䓬类镇静/麻醉药瑞马唑仑主要用于麻醉诱导、维持和诊疗操作镇静。本文拟基于计算机模拟、文献综述阐述瑞马唑仑的药理学特点、临床应用趋势和使用注意事项。方法 PubMed搜索发表的英文文章,主题词瑞马唑仑并关联CNS7056,必要时提取参考文献。根据瑞马唑仑、瑞芬太尼、咪达唑仑和异丙酚的药代学药效学,模拟静脉注射后起效、峰效应和恢复时间;为获得相同目标浓度,靶控输注(TCI)/静脉输注速度之比;稳态静脉输注停药后血浆浓度降低不同%所需时间。结果 瑞马唑仑起效较异丙酚慢,峰效应和恢复时间两者相近且均远快于咪达唑仑;为获得相同目标浓度,瑞马唑仑TCI/静脉输注速度比趋近1耗时1h,劣于瑞芬太尼而优于异丙酚;稳态静脉输注12h,瑞马唑仑浓度降低50%的时间(CSHT)为5.9min且相对恒定,而异丙酚CSHT随时间延长逐渐增加,约13.9min。结论 瑞马唑仑不宜常规用作术前药或极短时间诊疗操作;用于临床麻醉诱导和维持药理学特点与异丙酚相似,停药后恢复轻微好于异丙酚,两者均适用TCI模式给药;ICU镇静具有良好的应用前景。瑞马唑仑临床应用尚需进一步探索,尤其是临床情况下的药物相互作用和特殊人群。

关键词: 瑞马唑仑/计算机模拟/药理学/临床应用
Abstract:

Pharmacologic Overview of the Innovative Soft Drug Remimazolam Based on Computer Simulation. Ning Ma, Ren Guan, Xiwei Dong, Mazhong Zhang. Department of Anesthesiology & Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China Corresponding Author: Mazhong Zhang, zmzscmc@shsmu.edu.cn Abstract Objective Remimazolam is a new ultra–short-acting agent benzodiazepine for induction, maintenance of general anesthesia and procedural sedation/anesthesia. This article reviews the pharmacological characteristics, potential clinical applications and precautions based on the simulation and literatures. Methods Based on the published pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic research of remimazolam, remifentanil, midazolam, propofol and combined with real-world clinical scenarios,computer-simulated were used to obtain clinically relevant pharmacological parameters, including the onset time, peak effect time, recovery time after bolus injection. The ratio of continuous infusion/target-controlled infusion (TCI) rate of remimazolam with the same target plasma concentration. The percent context-sensitive decrement times were simulated after steady-state infusion. And also, PubMed was systematically searched for published articles in English to identified the studies of remimazolam (and CNS 7056) including pre-clinical, clinical trial and clinical application, and references were extracted if necessary. Results The onset time of remimazolam was slower than that of propofol, both had similar peak effect time and recovery time, which were much faster than midazolam. With the same target plasma concentration, the ratio of continuous infusion/TCI rate of remimazolam approaching to unity took more than 60 minutes, which was inferior to remifentanil and better than propofol, midazolam. The 50% context-sensitive decrement times (CSHT) of remimazolam was relatively constant, while propofol showed a gradual increasing, CSHTs were about 5.9 min and 13.9 min for remimazolam and propofol after 12h of steady-state infusion, respectively. Conclusions Rimimazolam is not suitable for routine use as premedication or for very short procedural sedation/anesthesia. Remimazolam has similar pharmacological characteristics to propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance with slightly rapid recovery after discontinuation, both is suitable for administration using target-controlled infusion mode. Remimazolam has good prospects for patients’ sedation in ICU. The further studies are needed for the clinical application of remimazolam, especially drug interactions and special populations in clinical situations.

Key words: Remimazolam/Computer Simulation/pharmacology/clinical application