国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2021, Issue (5): 0-0
    
益生菌对体外循环老年大鼠围手术期认知功能的影响
李龙, 李溪, 屈鹏霞, 刁玉刚, 孙莹杰1()
1.北部战区总医院
Effects of probiotics on the perioperative neurocognitive disorders of elderly rats with cardiopulmonary bypass
 全文:
摘要:

目的 评价益生菌对CPB老年大鼠围手术期认知功能障碍(perioperative neurocognitive disorders, PND)的影响。 方法 清洁级老年雄性SD大鼠48只,体重400~450 g,按随机数字表法分为4组(每组12只):假手术组(S组)、益生菌+假手术组(P组)、CPB组(C组)和益生菌+CPB组(H组)。各组又分为术后7 d和术后28 d两个亚组,每组6只。各组大鼠于术后7 d和术后28 d行水迷宫测试后,麻醉下处死大鼠,取右侧海马组织。H‑E染色光镜下观察海马组织病理学变化,Western blot检测脑组织中PND相关蛋白β‑淀粉样蛋白(amyloid β‑protein, Aβ)及Tau蛋白的变化。 结果 与S组比较(同时点亚组比较,下同):P组术后7 d和术后28 d的平均潜伏期明显缩短,总路程延长,穿越平台次数增加,停留时间也延长(P<0.05);C组、H组在术后7 d和术后28 d的平均潜伏期均明显延长,总路程缩短,穿越平台次数减少,停留时间也缩短(P<0.05)。与P组比较,C组和H组术后7 d和术后28 d的平均潜伏期明显延长,总路程缩短,穿越平台次数减少,停留时间也缩短(P<0.05)。与C组比较,H组术后7 d和术后28 d的平均潜伏期明显缩短,总路程延长,穿越平台次数增加,停留时间也延长(P<0.05)。H‑E染色显示S组和P组大鼠术后7 d和28 d海马CA1区未见明显神经元受损,C组大鼠术后7 d和28 d海马CA1区神经元变性明显,H组大鼠术后7 d和28 d海马CA1区受损较C组减轻。与S组比较,P组大鼠术后7 d和术后28 d海马Aβ和Tau蛋白表达均明显降低(P<0.05),C组、H组大鼠术后7 d和术后28 d海马Aβ和Tau蛋白表达均明显升高(P<0.05)。与C组比较,H组大鼠术后7 d和术后28 d海马Aβ和Tau蛋白表达明显降低(P<0.05)。 结论 益生菌可降低Aβ及Tau蛋白的表达,从而改善CPB老年大鼠PND。

关键词: 体外循环; 围手术期认知功能障碍; 益生菌; 脑‑肠轴
Abstract:

Objective To observe the effects of probiotics on the perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) of elderly rats with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Methods A total of 48 adult male SD rats (SPF grade), weighing 400‒450 g were used. According to the random number table method, they were divided into four groups (n=12): a sham operation (group S), a probiotics+sham operation (group P), a CPB surgery (group C), and a probiotics+CPB (group H). Furthermore, each group was divided into two subgroups (n=6): a 7‑day group and a 28‑day group. The water maze test was performed for each group 7 days and 28 days after surgery. The rats were sacrificed under anesthesia and the right hippocampus was collected. The histological changes of hippocampal tissues were observed by hematoxylin‑eosin (H‑E) staining. The changes of PND‑associated proteins amyloid β (Aβ) protein and Tau protein in brain tissues were detected by Western blot. Results Compared with group S (compared with the subgroup at the same time, the same below), group P presented remarkably shortened average latency, extended total distance, and increases in the number of platform crossing and the amount of time spent in each quadrant 7 days and 28 days after surgery (P<0.05); groups C and H presented remarkably extended average latency, reduced total distance, and decreases in the number of platform crossing and the amount of time spent in each quadrant 7 days and 28 days after surgery (P<0.05). Compared with group P, groups C and H showed extended average latency, reduced total distance, and decreases in the number of platform crossing and the amount of time spent in each quadrant 7 days and 28 days after surgery (P<0.05). Compared with group C, group H showed shortened average latency, extended total distance, and increases in the number of platform crossing and the amount of time spent in each quadrant 7 days and 28 days after surgery (P<0.05). According to H‑E staining, there was no obvious neuronal damage in the hippocampal CA1 region of rats in group S and group P 7 days and 28 days after surgery; the degenerative changes of neurons were obvious in the hippocampal CA1 region of rats in group C 7 days and 28 days after surgery; and the damage in the hippocampal CA1 region of rats in group H was relieved compared with that in group C 7 days and 28 days after surgery. Moreover, compared with the group S, the expression of Aβ and Tau proteins significantly decreased in group P 7 days and 28 days after surgery (P<0.05), while the expression of Aβ and Tau proteins significantly increased in group H and group C 7 days and 28 days after surgery (P<0.05). Compared with group C, the expression of Aβ and Tau proteins significantly decreased in group H 7 days and 28 days after surgery (P<0.05). Conclusions Probiotics can decrease the expression of Aβ and Tau proteins, so as to improve the PND of elderly rats with CPB.

Key words: Cardiopulmonary bypass; Perioperative neurocognitive disorders; Probiotics; Gut‑brain axis