国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2021, Issue (8): 8-8
    
椎旁神经阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞在腔镜食管癌 根治术中镇痛作用的比较
高安, 杨成伟, 孙丽娜, 黄祥, 李娟, 康芳1()
1.皖南医学院;安徽省立医院南区
Comparison of analgesic effects between the paravertebral nerve block and erector spinae plane block in endoscopic assisted radical resection of esophageal cancer
 全文:
摘要:

目的 观察竖脊肌平面阻滞(erector spinae plane block, ESPB)与椎旁神经阻滞(paravertebral nerve block, PVB)对腔镜食管癌根治术患者术后急慢性疼痛的影响。 方法 择期腔镜下行食管癌根治术的患者138例,采用随机数字表法分为椎旁神经阻滞组(P组)、竖脊肌平面阻滞组(E组)和对照组(C组),每组46例。全身麻醉诱导前P组在T5‑T6水平行PVB,E组在T5水平行ESPB,C组不予处理。记录3组患者术中丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼用量,术后首次自控镇痛给药时间,自控镇痛给药次数,喷他佐辛追加次数,首次下床活动时间及术后4 h(T1)、术后1 d(D1)、术后2 d(D2)、术后3 d(D3)时静息和咳嗽VAS疼痛评分;记录两组患者术后48 h并发症发生情况;术后3个月电话随访术后慢性疼痛(chronic post‑surgical pain, CPSP)发生情况。 结果 P组和E组术中丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量少于C组(P<0.05),P组术中瑞芬太尼用量少于E组(P<0.05)。T1、D1时C组静息VAS疼痛评分高于E组和P组(P<0.05),咳嗽VAS疼痛评分高于E组和P组(P<0.05);D1时P组静息VAS疼痛评分低于E组(P<0.05),T1、D1时P组咳嗽VAS疼痛评分低于E组(P<0.05)。E组和P组术后首次自控镇痛给药时间长于C组、自控镇痛给药次数及喷他佐辛追加次数少于C组(P<0.05);C组术后首次下床活动时间长于E组和P组,E组术后首次下床活动时间长于P组(P<0.05);C组术后3个月CPSP发生率高于P组(P<0.05)。其余指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 ESPB与PVB可缓解腔镜食管癌根治术患者术后疼痛,PVB镇痛效果优于ESPB,PVB可降低术后3个月CPSP发生率。

关键词: 慢性疼痛; 椎旁神经阻滞; 竖脊肌平面阻滞; 食管癌
Abstract:

Objective To observe the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and paravertebral nerve block (PVB) on postoperative pain in patients of esophageal cancer undergoing endoscopically assisted esophagectomy. Methods One hundred and thirty‑eight patients undergoing elective endoscopic assisted esophagectomy were divided into 3 groups according to the random number table method (n=46): erector spinae plane block group (group E), paravertebral nerve block group (group P) and control group (group C). Patients in group P received PVB at the T5‑T6 level before anesthesia induction. Patients in group E received ESPB at the T5 level respectively. Patients in group C only received general anesthesia. Consumption of propofol and remifentanil during operation, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of resting and coughing at 4 hours (T1), 1 day (D1), 2 days (D2), 3 days (D3) after the operation, the time of the first self‑control analgesia and the first‑time ambulation, the frequency of self‑control analgesia and times of pentazocine given were assessed. Incidence of adverse reactions at 48 h after the operation was recorded too. Chronic post‑surgical pain (CPSP) was evaluated by telephone follow‑up 3 months after surgery. Results Propofol and remifentanil consumption of group P and group E were less than the consumption in group C (P<0.05), The dosage of remifentanil in group P was less than the dosage in group E (P<0.05). At T1 and D1, the resting VAS score of group C was higher than that of group E and P (P<0.05), and the cough VAS score was higher than that of group E and P (P<0.05); at D1, the resting VAS score of group P was lower than the score in group E (P<0.05), and the cough VAS score of the group P was lower than that of the group E at T1 and D1 (P<0.05). First time and total times of PCA of group E and group P were later or less than that of group C, usage of pentazocine was also reduced (P<0.05). The first ambulation in group C was longer than the ambulation of group E and group P, and group E was longer than that of group P (P<0.05). The incidence of chronic postoperative pain in group C was higher than the incidence in group P (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in other indicators among the groups (P>0.05). Conclusions ESPB and PVB can relieve postoperative pain in patients undergoing endoscopically assisted esophagectomy, PVB has a better analgesic effect than ESPB, and PVB may reduce the incidence of CPSP at 3 months after surgery.

Key words: Chronic pain; Paravertebral nerve block; Erector spinae plane block; Esophageal cancer