国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (4): 0-0
    
ASA‑PS分级与胃癌患者远期全因死亡风险的研究
郑强, 张曼, 魏翠娜, 王赞, 余昌俊, 鲁显福1()
1.安徽医科大学第一附属医院高新院区麻醉科
Effects of American Society Anesthesiology Physical Status classification on the hazards of long‑term all‑cause mortality for gastric cancer patients
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨美国麻醉医师协会全身状态(American Society Anesthesiology Physical Status, ASA‑PS)分级对胃癌患者远期全因死亡风险的影响。 方法 回顾性分析2010年1月—2011年5月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院接受根治性全胃或部分胃切除治疗患者的资料。采用Kaplan‑Meier生存曲线和多因素Cox比例风险回归模型探讨ASA‑PS分级与胃癌患者远期全因死亡风险的关系。 结果 排除190例患者后,共有829例患者纳入此项研究,中位随访期(四分位数)为50(23,71)个月。ASA‑PS分级Ⅰ、Ⅱ级和Ⅲ/Ⅳ级各有193例(23.3%)、510例(61.5%)和126例(15.2%),对应的5年总生存率(overall survival, OS)逐级降低,分别为59.0%、45.3%和37.0%,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。在多因素模型中,相对于ASA‑PS分级Ⅰ级的患者,ASA‑PS分级Ⅱ级的患者术后远期全因死亡风险增加29%(95%CI 1%~70%,P=0.045),ASA‑PS分级Ⅲ/Ⅳ级患者的术后远期全因死亡风险增加46%(95CI 6%~102%,P=0.022),差异有统计学意义。 结论 ASA‑PS分级是影响胃癌患者术后远期全因死亡风险的独立危险因素。

关键词: 胃癌; 美国麻醉医师协会全身状态分级; 风险比; 预后
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of American Society Anesthesiology Physical Status (ASA‑PS) classification on the hazards of long‑term all‑cause mortality for gastric cancer patients. Methods Gastric cancer patients who underwent radical resection or partial resection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2010 to May 2011 were selected and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. A Kaplan‑Meier survival curve and a multiple Cox proportional regression model were used to analyze the association between ASA‑PS classification and long‑term all‑cause mortality in gastric cancer patients. Results A total of 829 patients were included in this study while 190 patients were excluded. The median (interquartile range) follow‑up time was 50 (23‒71) months. There were 193 cases (23.3%), 510 cases (61.5%) and 126 cases (15.2%) at ASA‑PS Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ/Ⅳ grades, respectively. Their five‑year overall survival (OS) was 59.0%, 45.3% and 37.0%, which significantly decreased (P<0.01). In the multivariable Cox regression model, compared with patients in the ASA‑PS Ⅰ grade, the hazards of long‑term all‑cause mortality significantly increased by 29% in the ASA‑PS Ⅱ grade [95% confidenceinterval (CI) 1%‒70%, P=0.045] and significantly increased by 46% in the ASA‑PS Ⅲ/Ⅳ grade (95%CI 6%‒102%, P=0.022). Conclusions ASA‑PS classification is an independent risk factor influencing the hazards of long‑term all‑cause mortality in gastric cancer patients after surgery.

Key words: Gastric cancer; American Society Anesthesiology Physical Status classification; Hazard ratio; Prognosis