国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (4): 0-0
    
胸椎旁神经阻滞和竖脊肌平面阻滞用于胸腔镜 肺叶切除术术后镇痛效果的Meta分析
穆子涵, 葛亚丽, 高巨1()
1.江苏省苏北人民医院
Comparison of postoperative analgesia between thoracic paravertebral block and erector spine plane block in video‑assisted thoracic surgery: a Meta‑analysis
 全文:
摘要:

目的 通过Meta分析方法评价超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞(thoracic paravertebral nerve block, TPVB)和竖脊肌平面阻滞(erector spinae plane block, ESPB)用于胸腔镜肺叶切除术术后镇痛的效果。 方法 计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、中国知网、万方数据、维普网和中国生物医学文献数据库,收集关于TPVB和ESPB在胸腔镜肺叶切除术术后镇痛效果比较的随机对照研究(randomized controlled trial, RCT),检索时限均为数据库建库至2021年5月,由两位研究人员按照纳入排除标准独立筛选文献,提取数据,评价文献的方法学质量。主要结局指标是术后1、2、4、6、8、12、24、48 h静息和咳嗽时的VAS疼痛评分;次要结局指标是操作时间,术后24 h内补救镇痛率,术后48 h镇痛泵有效按压次数,术后24、48 h阿片类药物使用量和术后镇痛相关不良反应发生率。采用RevMan 5.4软件对纳入文献进行Meta分析。 结果 最终纳入14项RCT,共895例患者。Meta分析结果显示,与ESPB术后镇痛相比,TPVB术后镇痛患者术后12 h静息时[标准化均数差(standardized mean difference, SMD) −0.66,95%CI −1.25~−0.07,P<0.05]、术后1 h咳嗽时(SMD −1.18,95%CI −2.05~−0.31,P<0.05),术后6 h咳嗽时(SMD −0.96,95%CI −1.71~−0.21,P<0.05)和术后12 h咳嗽时(SMD −0.85,95%CI −1.36~−0.34,P<0.05)的VAS疼痛评分明显降低,其他术后时间点静息和咳嗽时的VAS疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两者术后24 h阿片类药物使用量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TPVB术后48 h阿片类药物使用量低于ESPB(SMD −0.44,95%CI −0.71~−0.17,P<0.05)。TPVB术后24 h内补救镇痛发生率较低[比值比(odd radio, OR) 0.67,95%CI 0.47~0.97,P<0.05],但操作时间高于ESPB(SMD 1.69,95%CI 0.82~2.56,P<0.05)。两者术后48 h镇痛泵有效按压次数、术后恶心呕吐和皮肤瘙痒等相关不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 TPVB在术后早期(24 h)镇痛效果优于ESPB,两者在术后远期(48 h)镇痛效果无明显差异。ESPB操作时间低于TPVB,且与TPVB相比不会增加镇痛相关不良反应发生率。

关键词: 胸椎旁神经阻滞; 竖脊肌平面阻滞; 胸腔镜肺叶切除术; 术后镇痛; Me
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) and erector spine plane block (ESPB) for postoperative analgesia of video⁃assisted thoracic surgery by Meta⁃analysis. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM were searched. All randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing TPVB and ESPB for postoperative analgesia of video⁃assisted thoracic surgery were collected. The retrieval time limit was from the establishment of the database to May 2021. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of trials and extracted data. The primary outcomes were the postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at rest and during cough 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were the puncture time, the rate of rescue analgesia within 24 h after surgery, the number of effective compression of the analgesic pump within 48 h after surgery, the use of opioids at 24 h and 48 h after surgery and the incidence of postoperative analgesic related adverse reactions. Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 5.4 software. Results Fourteen RCT involving 895 patients were included. Compared with ESPB, TPVB showed remarkable decreases in VAS scores at rest 12 h after surgery [standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) −1.25,−0.07], P<0.05], during cough 1 h after surgery [SMD −1.18 (95%CI −2.05, −0.31), P<0.05], during cough 6 h after surgery [SMD −0.96 (95%CI −1.71, −0.21), P<0.05] and during cough 12 h after surgery [SMD −0.85 (95%CI −1.36, −0.34), P<0.05]. There was no statistical difference in VAS scores at rest and during cough at other postoperative time points. There was no statistical difference in opioid dosages between the two groups 24 h after surgery (P>0.05) and the opioid use of TPVB was lower than ESPB 48 h after surgery [SMD −0.44 (95%CI −0.71,−0.17), P<0.05]. The incidence of rescue analgesia of TPVB within 24 h after surgery was lower than ESPB [odd radio (OR) 0.67 (95%CI 0.47, 0.97), P<0.05] and the puncture time of TPVB was significantly longer than ESPB [SMD 1.69 (95%CI 0.82, 2.56), P<0.05]. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of effective compression of the analgesic pump within 48 h after surgery and the incidence of postoperative analgesic related adverse reactions. Conclusions TPVB is better than ESPB in the early (24 h) postoperative analgesia, and there is no significant difference between the two methods in the long⁃term postoperative (48 h) analgesia. ESPB puncture time is significantly lower than TPVB, and does not increase the incidence of analgesia⁃related adverse reactions.

Key words: Thoracic paravertebral nerve block; Erector spinae plane block; Video‑assisted thoracic surgery; Postoperative analgesia; Meta‑analysis