国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (6): 0-0
    
环泊酚联合小剂量舒芬太尼在门诊无痛胃肠镜检查中的麻醉效果与安全性研究
黄凤南, 崔珊珊, 徐城, 许婷婷, 夏中元, 雷少青1()
1.武汉大学人民医院
The anesthetic effects and safety of ciprofol combined with low‑dose sufentanil in adult outpatients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy
 全文:
摘要:

目的 评估环泊酚联合小剂量舒芬太尼在门诊无痛胃肠镜检查中的麻醉效果与安全性。 方法 选择门诊无痛胃肠镜检查的成年患者,采用随机数字表法分为环泊酚组和丙泊酚组,每组82例。环泊酚组患者给予舒芬太尼0.1 μg/kg+环泊酚0.4 mg/kg,丙泊酚组患者给予舒芬太尼0.1 μg/kg+丙泊酚1.5 mg/kg。观察两组患者入室后(T0)、麻醉诱导完成后(T1)、进镜后5 min(T2)、出室(T3)时的心率、MAP、SpO2,记录两组患者镇静成功率、操作时间、麻醉诱导时间、苏醒时间、药物总用量、不良事件发生率、患者与医师满意度。 结果 与T0时点比较,两组患者T2、T3时点心率与MAP均降低(P<0.05),但两组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者各时点SpO2差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者镇静成功率均为100%。与丙泊酚组比较,环泊酚组麻醉诱导时间与苏醒时间更短(P<0.05),患者满意度更高(P<0.05);而两组操作时间和医师满意度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。环泊酚组患者总体不良事件发生率明显低于丙泊酚组(P<0.001),主要表现为低氧血症、低血压、注射痛的发生率更低(P<0.05)。 结论 环泊酚联合小剂量舒芬太尼可用于门诊胃肠镜检查患者的镇静,具有不良事件发生率低、患者满意度高等优势。

关键词: 环泊酚; 丙泊酚; 麻醉效果; 不良事件; 胃肠镜检查
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the anesthetic effects and safety of ciprofol combined with low‑dose sufentanil in outpatients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods Adult outpatients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups (n=82): a ciprofol group and a propofol group. The ciprofol group was administered with 0.1 μg/kg of sufentanil and 0.4 mg/kg of ciprofol, while the propofol group was given 0.1 μg/kg of sufentanil and 1.5 mg/kg of propofol. Their heart rate, MAP and SpO2 were observed after entry into the room (T0), after anesthesia induction (T1), 5 min after the endoscope was inserted (T2), and after discharge from the room (T3). Their success rate of sedation, operating time, anesthesia induction time, recovery time, total drug dosage, the incidence of adverse events and the satisfaction of patients and physicians were recorded. Results Compared with those at T0, the heart rate and MAP of both groups decreased at T2 and T3 (P<0.05), without statistical difference (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in SpO2 between the two groups at each time point (P>0.05). The successful sedation rate was 100% in both the ciprofol and propofol groups. Compared with the propofol group, the ciprofol group showed reduced induction time and recovery time (P<0.05), and improved patient satisfaction (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in operating time and physician satisfaction between the two groups (P>0.05). The overall incidence of adverse events in the ciprofol group was significantly lower than that in the propofol group (P<0.001), which was mainly manifested as a lower incidence of hypoxemia, hypotension, and injection pain (P<0.05). Conclusions Ciprofol combined with low‑dose sufentanil can be used for calming outpatients undergoing gastroenterology, with the advantages of a low incidence of adverse events and high patient satisfaction.

Key words: Ciprofol; Propofol; Anesthetic effects; Adverse events; Gastrointestinal endoscopy