国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (3): 0-0
    
腰方肌阻滞与肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜胃癌根治术后镇痛效果的比较
贾晓童, 吕蒙, 武广函, 刘怡, 王月兰1()
1.潍坊医学院麻醉学院
Comparison of quadratus lumborum block and oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in analgesia after laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较超声引导下腰方肌阻滞(quadratus lumborum block, QLB)与肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞(transverse abdominal plane block, TAPB)用于腹腔镜胃癌根治术的术后镇痛效果。 方法 选择2021年1月至2021年7月择期在全身麻醉下行腹腔镜胃癌根治术的患者60例,采用随机数字表法分为两组(每组30例):肋缘下TAPB组(T组)和QLB组(Q组)。全身麻醉诱导前,两组患者分别在超声引导下行双侧肋缘下TAPB或QLB,两组每侧均注射0.375%罗哌卡因20 ml。两组患者术后行自控静脉镇痛,记录术后2、4、6、12、24、48 h静息和运动状态VAS疼痛评分,记录术后镇痛泵首次按压时间、术后24 h镇痛泵药物使用量、术后48 h地佐辛注射液使用量,记录两组患者手术时长、神经阻滞操作时长、术中舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼用量、术后并发症发生情况、术后首次排气时间、术后首次下床时间和住院时长。 结果 Q组术后2、4、6、12 h静息状态及术后2、4、6、24 h 运动状态VAS疼痛评分均明显低于T组(P<0.05),术后镇痛泵首次按压时间迟于T组(P<0.05),术后24 h镇痛泵药物使用量明显少于T组(P<0.05),术后48 h地佐辛用量明显少于T组(P<0.05);Q组神经阻滞操作时长明显长于T组(P<0.05),术后恶心的发生率低于T组(P<0.05),术后首次排气时间和术后首次下床时间明显早于T组(P<0.05)。两组患者其余指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 与肋缘下TAPB比较,QLB可为腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者提供更好的镇痛效果,且术后并发症发生率更低,有助于促进腹腔镜胃癌根治术后患者快速康复。

关键词: 腰方肌阻滞; 腹横肌平面阻滞; 术后镇痛
Abstract:

Objective To compare the effects of ultrasound‑guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery. Methods A total of 60 patients who were scheduled for laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery under general anesthesia from January to July 2021 were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups (n=30): a TAPB group (group T) and a QLB group (group Q). Both groups underwent bilateral subcostal TAPB or QLB under ultrasound guidance before induction of general anesthesia, and 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine was injected into each side in both groups. After surgery, both groups underwent patient controlled intravenous analgesia. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at resting and during movement 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 h and 48 h after surgery, the first time to press the patient controlled intravenous analgesia pump, the dosage of analgesia pump used 24 h after surgery, and the consumption of dezocine injection 48 h after operation were recorded. Their operation time, nerve block operation time, intraoperative sufentanil and remifentanil dosages, postoperative complications, time to postoperative first anal exhaust, time to postoperative first out‑of‑bed activity and the length of hospitalization stay were recorded in the two groups. Result In group Q, the VAS scores at resting 2, 4, 6 h and 12 h after surgery and during movement 2, 4, 6 h and 24 h after surgery were significantly lower than those in group T (P<0.05). Group Q presented decreases in the first time to press analgesic pump after surgery, compared with group T (P<0.05), and decreases in the dosage of analgesic pump used within 24 h, compared with group T (P<0.05), decreases in the dosage of dezocine 48 h after surgery, compared with group T (P<0.05); increases in the operation time of nerve block, compared with group T (P<0.05), decreases in the incidence of postoperative nausea, compared with group T (P<0.05), and decreases in the time to first anal exhaust and first out-of-bed activity after operation, compared with group T (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in other indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Compared with oblique subcostal TAPB, QLB can provide better analgesia, with a decreased incidence of postoperative complications for patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery, which can facilitate fast recovery after laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery.

Key words: Quadratus lumborum block; Transversus abdominis plane block; Postoperative analgesia