国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (6): 0-0
    
超声引导下CCB和ISB对上肢骨折术后镇痛效果的比较
王叶纯, 张斌, 项舒玮, 张中军, 张邓新1()
1.徐州医科大学
Comparison of postoperative analgesia between ultrasound‑guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block and interscalene brachial plexus block for upper limb fractures
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较超声引导下连续肋锁间隙臂丛神经阻滞(costoclavicular brachial plexus block, CCB)和连续肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞(interscalene brachial plexus block, ISB)对上肢骨折术后的镇痛效果。 方法 选取择期行上肢骨折切开复位内固定术的患者70例,按随机数字表法分为全麻+连续CCB术后镇痛组(C组)和全麻+连续ISB术后镇痛组(I组),每组35例。两组患者分别在超声引导下行连续CCB或ISB,操作完成后于全麻下进行手术,术毕连接电子镇痛泵。记录神经阻滞操作时间,手术时间,术中丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼和右美托咪定用量;记录神经阻滞完成后5、10、15、20、25、30 min正中神经、尺神经、桡神经、肌皮神经的感觉和运动神经阻滞情况;记录术后8、12、24、48 h运动与静息疼痛数字分级评分法(Numerical Rating Scale, NRS)评分和术后48 h镇痛泵有效按压次数;记录术后恶心呕吐、嗜睡等不良反应发生情况。 结果 两组患者穿刺和置管顺利,均未出现阻滞相关并发症。C组神经阻滞操作时间短于I组(P<0.05),两组患者手术时间和术中丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼、右美托咪定用量差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。神经阻滞完成后 5、10 min时,C组正中神经、尺神经、肌皮神经的感觉和运动神经阻滞成功率均高于I组(P<0.05);其余时点两组感觉和运动神经阻滞成功率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与I组比较,C组术后8、12、24、48 h静息与运动疼痛NRS评分均降低(P<0.05),且术后48 h镇痛泵有效按压次数更少(P<0.05)。两组患者术后不良反应发生情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 连续CCB可为上肢骨折手术患者术后提供有效的疼痛控制。

关键词: 肋锁间隙臂丛神经阻滞; 肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞; 超声引导; 镇痛
Abstract:

Objective To compare the analgesic effects of ultrasound‑guided continuous costoclavicular brachial plexus block (CCB) and continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) for the treatment of upper limb fractures. Methods A total of 70 patients who were scheduled for internal fixation of upper limb fractures were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups (n=35): a general anesthesia+continuous CCB group (group C) and a general anesthesia+continuous ISB group (group I). Patients in both groups underwent ultrasound‑guided CCB or ISB, respectively. Then, the operation was performed under general anesthesia. After operation, an electronic analgesic pump was connected. Their nerve block operation time, operation time, and the intraoperative dosages of propofol, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine were recorded. Their sensory and motor nerve blocks of the median nerve, ulnar nerve, radial nerve and musculocutaneous nerve were recorded 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 min after nerve block. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at resting and during movement 8, 12, 24 h and 48 h after surgery and the times of effective pump pressing 48 h after operation were recorded. Postoperative nausea, vomiting, lethargy and other adverse reactions were recorded. Results Puncture and catheterization were successful in both groups, and no complications related to block occurred. The operation time of nerve block in group C was shorter than that in group I (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the operation time and the intraoperative dosages of propofol, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine between the two groups (P>0.05). The success sensory and motor block rates of the median nerve, ulnar nerve and musculocutaneous nerve in group C were higher than those in group I, 5 min and 10 min after nerve block (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the success sensory and motor never block rates between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). Compared with group I, NRS scores at resting and during movement 8, 12, 24 h and 48 h in group C were reduced (P<0.05), and the times of effective pump pressing decreased (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Continuous CCB can provide effective postoperative pain control for patients with upper limb fractures.

Key words: Costoclavicular brachial plexus block; Interscalene brachial plexus block; Ultrasound‑guided; Analgesia