国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2023, Issue (5): 8-8
    
新辅助化疗对乳腺癌患者术后肌松残余的影响
杨洁, 王恬, 马倩, 徐孙勉, 汪杰, 陈学新1()
1.宁夏医科大学临床医学院
Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative residual curarization in breast cancer patients
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨新辅助化疗对乳腺癌患者术后肌松残余(postoperative residual curarization, PORC)的影响。 方法 选取择期行乳腺癌根治手术的患者71例,根据患者是否进行新辅助化疗分为两组:新辅助化疗组(N组,35例)和对照组(C组,36例)。N组术前行4~6周期新辅助化疗,其中21例行多西他赛+环磷酰胺(TC)方案,14例行多西他赛+洛铂(Tcb)方案,化疗结束1个月内行手术治疗;C组直接行手术治疗。记录两组患者拔除喉罩即刻、入PACU即刻的四个成串刺激比值(train‑of‑four ratio, TOFR),计算PORC发生率。记录两组患者术前肝肾功能、电解质及酸碱水平,术中麻醉药使用情况及输液量,肌松恢复时间,自主呼吸恢复时间,睁眼时间,拔管时间,PACU停留时间,拔管后最低SpO2及低氧血症发生情况,恢复期不良反应发生情况。 结果 两组患者术前肝肾功能、电解质及酸碱水平,术中麻醉药使用情况及输液量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。拔除喉罩即刻,N组TOFR低于C组(P<0.05),PORC发生率高于C组(P<0.05);入PACU即刻,N组TOFR低于C组(P<0.05),PORC发生率高于C组(P<0.05)。N组肌松恢复时间、自主呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔管时间、PACU停留时间均较C组延长(P<0.05)。N组拔管后最低SpO2低于C组(P<0.05),低氧血症发生率高于C组(P<0.05)。两组患者恢复期不良反应发生情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者PORC发生率高于未接受新辅助化疗的患者,且麻醉恢复时间、肌松恢复时间、PACU停留时间延长,术后低氧血症发生率增高。

关键词: 新辅助化疗; 肌松残余; 乳腺癌; 神经肌肉监测
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative residual curarization (PORC) in breast cancer patients. Methods A total of 71 female patients who were scheduled for breast‑cancer surgery were enrolled. According to the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, they were divided into two groups: a neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (group N, n=35) and a control group (group C, n=36). Before surgery, group N received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 4 to 6 cycles of treatment, where 21 received docetaxel+cyclophosphamide (TC) regimen and 14 received docetaxel+loplatin (Tcb) regimen, and surgery was performed within one month after the end of the chemotherapy. Group C directly underwent surgery. The train‑of‑four ratio (TOFR) were measured immediately after laryngeal mask removal and arrival in the post‑anesthesia care unit (PACU), while the incidence of PORC was calculated. Their preoperative electrolyte, liver and kidney function, and acid‑base level before surgery were recorded. Furthermore, intraoperative anesthetic use and infusion volume, the time of residual neuromuscular blockade recovery, the time of spontaneous breathing recovery, eye‑opening, extubation, and the time of discharging from the PACU in the two groups were recorded. The lowest pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) after extubation and the occurrence of hypoxemia and other adverse events during recovery were observed. Results There were no statistical differences in preoperative liver and kidney function, electrolyte, acid‑base levels, intraoperative anesthetic use, and infusion volume between the two groups (P>0.05). Immediately after laryngeal mask removal, group N showed significantly lower TOFR than group C, and a higher incidence of PORC than group C (P<0.05). Immediately after arrival in PACU, group N presented significantly lower TOFR than group C, and a higher incidence of PORC than group C (P<0.05). Compared with group C, group N showed increases in the time of neuromuscular function recovery, and the time of spontaneous breathing recovery, eye‑opening, extubation, and the length of PACU stay (P<0.05). The lowest SpO2 after extubation in group N increased and the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia increased, compared with those of group C (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in adverse events between the two groups during the recovery period (P>0.05). Conclusions Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy show an increased incidence of PORC, and increases in the times of anesthesia recovery and neuromuscular function recovery, the length of PACU stay, and the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia, compared with those without chemotherapy.

Key words: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Residual curarization; Breast cancer; Neuromuscular monitoring