国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2023, Issue (8): 0-0
    
不同时机行肩关节手法松解术治疗原发性冻结肩的疗效对比
刘尧1()
1.徐州医科大学
Therapeutic effects comparison in patients with frozen shoulder undergoing manipulation under anesthesia at different operation time
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨不同时机行臂丛麻醉下肩关节手法松解术(MUA)治疗原发性冻结肩(PFS)的临床疗效。 方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年6月接受MUA治疗的PFS患者临床资料,根据手术时的病程时间分为A组(<3个月)、B组(3~6个月)、C组(6~9个月)、D组(9~12个月)。比较术前和术后1月、3月及6月时疼痛数字评分(numerical rating scales,NRS)、肩关节主动活动范围(active range of motion,AROM)、日常生活能力量表(activity of daily living,ADL)评分及恢复满意度。同时比较四组患者术后镇痛药物使用率和术后12个月内二次粘连的发生率。 结果 共纳入129例患者进行统计分析,其中A组33例,B组35例,C组32例,D组29例。与术前比较,四组术后各时间点NRS、AROM和ADL评分均显著改善(P<0.05);组间方差分析结果表明:四组术后各时间点NRS、AROM和ADL评分均无显著差异(P>0.05);A组术后1月内的镇痛药物使用率显著高于D组;同时,D组患者术后一月恢复满意度显著高于A组(P<0.05);四组二次粘连的发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。 结论: 不同时机行肩关节手法松解术治疗原发性冻结肩不存在明显的疗效差异,因此更加推荐早期干预治疗以缩短病程,加快肩关节功能恢复。

关键词: 冻结肩;手法松解,不同时机;疗效
Abstract:

Objective To compare the therapeutic effects in patients with primary frozen shoulder (PFS) undergoing manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) at different operation time. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with a primary frozen shoulder treated by MUA from June 2019 to June 2021. According to the duration of presenting symptoms, they were divided into four groups: group A (within 3 months), group B (3 to 6 months), group C (6 to 9 months) and group D (9 to 12 months). The numerical rating scales (NRS) pain scores, active range of motion (AROM), activity of daily living (ADL) scores and satisfaction with recovery were recorded before surgery and 1 mo, 3 mo and 6 mo after surgery. Meanwhile, the use of analgesics and the incidence of recurrent adhesion within 12 months after surgery were also recorded. Results A total of 129 patients were selected for the statistical analysis, including 33 in group A, 35 in group B, 32 in group C, and 29 in group D. Compared with basal, NRS, AROM and ADL scores improved significantly (P<0.05). The results of ANOVA between groups showed that there were no significant differences in NRS, AROM and ADL scores at each time point after surgery (P>0.05). Compared with group D, the use of analgesics in Group A within 1 month after surgery was significantly increased (P<0.05). Meanwhile, patient satisfaction with recovery in group D within 1 month after surgery was significantly higher than that in Group A (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of recurrent adhesion between the four groups (P>0.05). Conclusion There is no significant difference in the therapeutic effects in patients with primary frozen shoulder undergoing manipulation under anesthesia at different operation time. Therefore, early intervention is more recommended for patients with primary frozen shoulder to shorten disease duration and accelerate the recovery of shoulder function.

Key words: Frozen shoulder; Manipulation under anesthesia; Different timing; Therapeutic effects