国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2023, Issue (7): 0-0
    
不同剂量艾司氯胺酮在老年胃肠肿瘤手术中的临床效果观察
马晓燕, 李文娟, 贾莉莉, 盛明薇, 喻文立1()
1.长治市人民医院
Clinical observation of different doses of esketamine in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor operation
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨不同剂量艾司氯胺酮在老年胃肠肿瘤手术中的有效性和安全性。 方法 选取年龄≥65岁择期行胃肠肿瘤手术的患者120例,按随机数字表法分为4组(每组30例):对照组(C组)、艾司氯胺酮0.2 mg/kg组(K1组)、艾司氯胺酮0.3 mg/kg组(K2组)、艾司氯胺酮0.4 mg/kg组(K3组)。K1组、K2组、K3组麻醉诱导时分别给予艾司氯胺酮0.2、0.3、0.4 mg/kg,术中分别泵注艾司氯胺酮0.2、0.3、0.4 mg·kg−1·h−1维持麻醉;C组在相应时间给予同体积生理盐水。记录4组患者麻醉诱导前(T0)、气管插管后5 min(T1)、手术开始后5 min(T2)、缝皮时(T3)的MAP和心率,术中舒芬太尼、去甲肾上腺素和麻黄碱用量,术后苏醒时间、拔管时间,拔除气管导管后5 min Richmond躁动‑镇静(Richmond Agitation‑Sedation Scale, RASS)评分和躁动发生情况,PACU期间眩晕、恶心呕吐、瘙痒的发生率,出PACU时VAS疼痛评分。 结果 与T0时比较,T1时4组MAP均降低(P<0.05),T2时4组患者心率均降低(P<0.05);与C组比较,K2组、K3组T1时MAP升高(P<0.05),K3组T2时MAP升高(P<0.05);其他时点MAP和心率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。K1组、K2组、K3组术中麻黄碱用量小于C组(P<0.05),4组患者术中舒芬太尼、去甲肾上腺素用量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与K3组比较,C组、K1组和K2组术后苏醒时间和拔管时间均缩短(P<0.05)。与C组比较,K3组RASS评分升高(P<0.05),K2组和K3组躁动发生率降低(P<0.05)。4组患者均未发生恶心呕吐、眩晕、瘙痒等不良反应,出PACU时VAS疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 老年胃肠道肿瘤患者麻醉诱导时给予艾司氯胺酮0.3 mg/kg,术中泵注0.3 mg·kg−1·h−1维持麻醉,能够改善血流动力学,减少血管活性药物使用量,降低术后躁动发生率,增加临床使用安全性和有效性。

关键词: 艾司氯胺酮; 胃肠道肿瘤; 手术治疗; 老年患者
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of esketamine at different doses in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor operation. Methods A total of 120 patients aged 65 years or older who were scheduled for gastrointestinal tumor operation were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into four groups (n=30): a control group (group C), an esketamine 0.2 mg/kg group (group K1), an esketamine 0.3 mg/kg group (group K2), and an esketamine 0.4 mg/kg group (group K3). Then, patients in groups K1, K2 and K3 were administered with esketamine at 0.2, 0.3 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg for anesthesia induction, followed by intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.2, 0.3 mg·kg−1·h−1 and 0.4 mg·kg−1·h−1 for anesthesia maintenance. Meanwhile, those in C group were given the same volume of normal saline. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were recorded after the patients entering into the operation room (T0), 5 min after tracheal intubation (T1), 5 min after the beginning of the operation (T2), and at skin suture (T3). Furthermore, their consumption of sufentanil, norepinephrine and ephedrine, postoperative recovery time, extubation time, the Richmond Agitation‑Sedation Scale (RASS) score, the incidence of vertigo, nausea and vomiting, pruritus during postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score when leaving PACU. Results Compared with those at T0, the four groups showed decreases in MAP at T1 (P<0.05), and heart rate at T2 (P<0.05). Compared with group C, groups K2 and K3 presented increased MAP at T1 (P<0.05), while group K3 showed increased MAP at T2 (P<0.05). There were no statistical differences in MAP and heart rate at other time points (P>0.05). The consumption of ephedrine in groups K1, K2 and K3 was lower than that in group C (P<0.05), and there was no statistical difference in the amount of sufentanil and norepinephrine among the four groups (P>0.05). Compared with group K3, the recovery time and extubation time of groups C, K1 and K2 were shortened (P<0.05). Compared with group C, group K showed increases in RASS score (P<0.05), while groups K2 and K3 presented decreases in the incidence of agitation (P<0.05). No adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, vertigo and pruritus occurred in the four groups, and there was no statistical difference in VAS pain score when leaving PACU (P>0.05). Conclusions For elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor operation, administration of esketamine at 0.3 mg/kg for anesthesia induction followed by intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.3 mg·kg−1·h−1 for anesthesia maintenance can improve hemodynamics, reduce the consumption of vasoactive agents, decrease the incidence of postoperative agitation and increase the clinical safety and effectiveness.

Key words: Esketamine; Gastroenteric tumor; Surgical therapy; Elderly patient