国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2023, Issue (9): 8-8
    
丙泊酚和环泊酚静脉麻醉对宫腔镜手术中膈肌运动影响的随机对照研究
徐永成, 李荣华, 徐敏逸, 张建楠, 乔羽清, 蔡靓羽1()
1.无锡市中医医院
Effect of intravenous anesthesia with propofol and ciprofol on diaphragmatic movements during hysteroscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较丙泊酚和环泊酚用于静脉麻醉下宫腔镜手术时对呼吸运动的影响。 方法 选择2021年10月至2022年6月在无锡市中医医院行宫腔镜手术治疗患者100例,采用随机数字表法分为环泊酚组(H组)和丙泊酚组(P组),每组50例。所有患者静脉注射羟考酮后,H组静脉输注环泊酚维持麻醉,P组静脉输注丙泊酚维持麻醉,如期间患者出现皱眉或体动反应,可追加用药,根据手术进程调控麻醉,维持BIS值在50~60。呼吸功能监测采用M型超声观察测量膈肌运动幅度。分别记录入室时(T0)、扩张宫颈时(T1)、诱导后5 min(T2)、苏醒时(T3)患者的心率、MAP、呼吸频率(respiratory rate,RR)、SpO2、BIS、膈肌运动幅度,并记录患者的注射痛、呃逆、呼吸抑制、术后恶心呕吐等不良反应及术后患者满意度。 结果 H组注射痛、呼吸抑制、低血压发生率明显低于P组(P<0.05);T1时点H组心率、MAP、RR、膈肌运动幅度明显高于P组(P<0.05);与T0时点比较,两组患者T1时心率、MAP、RR、膈肌运动幅度均明显降低(P<0.05)。 结论 相比于丙泊酚,环泊酚可以提供相似的理想镇静效果,但呼吸抑制发生少,且很少产生注射痛。环泊酚联合羟考酮用于宫腔镜手术麻醉相比丙泊酚优势更明显。

关键词: 丙泊酚; 环泊酚; 静脉麻醉; 宫腔镜手术; 膈肌运动幅度; 呼吸功能
Abstract:

Objective To compare the effect of propofol and ciprofol on respiratory movements during hysteroscopic surgery under intravenous anesthesia. Methods A total of 100 patients who underwent hysteroscopic surgery in Wuxi Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from October 2021 to June 2022 were selected. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups (n=50): a circopolol group (group H) and a propofol group (group P). All the patients were intravenously injected with oxycodone. Then, patients in group H and group P were intravenously injected with ciprofol and propofol for anesthesia maintenance, respectively. Additional drugs would be administered if the patients showed frowning or somatic movement reaction during the period. Anesthesia was regulated according to the surgical process, where bispectral index (BIS) value was maintained at 50‒60. Respiratory function was monitored by M⁃mode ultrasound to measure the amplitude of diaphragm movements. Their heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), BIS, and the amplitude of diaphragm movements were recorded at the time of admission into the room (T0), at the time of cervical dilatation (T1), 5 min after induction (T2), and at the time of awakening (T3). Furthermore, adverse reactions such as injection pain, hiccup, respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative patient satisfaction were recorded. Result Group H presented remarkable decreases in the incidences of injection pain, respiratory depression, and hypotension than group P (P<0.05). Group H also showed significant increases in heart rate, MAP, RR, and the amplitude of diaphragm movements than group P at T1 (P<0.05). Compared with those at T0, heart rate, MAP, RR, and the amplitude of diaphragm movements were significantly reduced in both groups at T1 (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with propofol, ciprofol can provide similar ideal sedation, but show less respiratory depression, with rare injection pain. The combined use of ciprofol and oxycodone is more beneficial during anesthesia for hysteroscopy than propofol.

Key words: Propofol; Ciprofol; Intravenous anesthesia; Hysteroscopic surgery; Diaphragm movement; Respiratory function