国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2023, Issue (6): 0-0
    
星状神经节阻滞在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中的临床应用
尹盼盼, 董林剑, 魏翠娜, 郭克芳, 鲁显福1()
1.安徽医科大学第一附属医院高新院区麻醉科
Clinical application of stellate ganglion block in off‑pump coronary artery bypass grafting
 全文:
摘要:

目的 研究星状神经节阻滞(stellate ganglion block, SGB)能否减少非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(off‑pump coronary artery bypass grafting, OPCABG)术中抗心律失常药物的使用、改善桥血管流量及降低术后并发症的发生率。 方法 选择120例接受OPCABG择期手术的患者,根据术前是否行左侧星状神经节阻滞(left stellate ganglion block group, LSGB)分为LSGB组和对照组(C组),每组60例。LSGB组患者麻醉诱导前行LSGB,C组患者未接受LSGB;两组患者麻醉诱导和维持方案相同。记录两组患者年龄、BMI、左室射血分数(left ventricular ejection fractions, LVEF)、手术时间和冠状动脉旁路移植支数,记录两组患者术中是否使用利多卡因、胺碘酮、西地兰、艾司洛尔等抗心律失常情况及桥血管的流量,记录术后并发症发生情况。 结果 两组患者年龄、BMI、LVEF、手术时间和冠状动脉旁路移植支数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与LSGB组比较,C组术中利多卡因、艾司洛尔的使用率明显增多,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术中胺碘酮、西地兰的使用率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。LSGB组左乳内动脉‑前降支、大隐静脉‑后降支、大隐静脉‑回旋支的桥血管流量高于C组(P<0.05),而两组患者大隐静脉‑前降支、大隐静脉‑对角支、大隐静脉‑右冠状动脉的桥血管流量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后肺部感染、肾功能不全、呼吸衰竭、胸腔积液、切口愈合不良、脑梗死、急性心力衰竭等并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 全麻联合LSGB可以明显减少OPCABG术中抗心律失常药物的使用、减慢心率、改善桥血管流量,但对术后相关并发症的发生率没有影响。

关键词: 星状神经节;OPCABG;抗心律失常药物;交感神经
Abstract:

Objective To investigate whether stellate ganglion block (SGB) can reduce the use of intraoperative antiarrhythmic drugs in off‑pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG), improve the flow of bridging vessels, and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. Methods A total of 120 patients who received elective OPCABG were selected. According to the presence of left stellate ganglion block (LSGB) before surgery, they were divided into two groups (n=60): a LSGB group and a control (C) group. Patients in the LSGB group received LSGB before anesthesia induction, while those in the C group did not receive LSGB. Both groups underwent the same procedures for anesthesia induction and maintenance. Then, their age, BMI, left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF), operation time, and the number of coronary artery bypass grafts were recorded. Furthermore, the consumption of lidocaine, amiodarone, cedilanid, esmolol, and other antiarrhythmic drugs during the operation, the flow of bridging vessels, and the incidence of postoperative complications were recorded. Results There was no statistical difference in age, BMI, LVEF, operation time, and the number of coronary artery bypass grafts between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the LSGB group, the utilization rates of lidocaine and esmolol in the C group significantly increased (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the utilization rate of amiodarone and cedilanid between the two groups (P>0.05). The flow of bridging vessels in the left internal mammary artery‑anterior descending branch, the great saphenous vein-posterior descending branch and the great saphenous vein-circumflex branch in the LSGB group was higher than that in the C group (P<0.05), while no statistical difference was found as to the flow of bridging vessels in the great saphenous vein-anterior descending branch, the great saphenous vein-diagonal branch and the great saphenous vein-right coronary artery between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidences of postoperative pulmonary infection, renal insufficiency, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, poor wound healing, cerebral infarction, acute heart failure, and other complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions General anesthesia combined with LSGB can significantly reduce the consumption of intraoperative antiarrhythmic drugs, slow down the heart rate and improve the flow of bridging vessels, but does not affect the incidence of postoperative complications.

Key words: Stellate ganglion block; Off‑pump coronary artery bypass grafting; Antiarrhythmic drugs; Sympathetic nerve