国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2011, Issue (6): 5-5
    
术中调节全身炎性反应对预防性镇痛的影响
蒋嘉1()
1.首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院
The Effect of Adjusting Systemic Inflammatory Response During the Operation on the Preventive Analgesia
 全文:
摘要:

目的 观察老年骨科病人术中使用乌司他丁调节全身炎性反应对预防性镇痛的影响。方法 80例65-80岁骨科手术病人被随机分入全麻+乌司他丁组(A)、全麻+硬膜外麻醉组(B)、全麻+乌司他丁复合硬膜外麻醉组(C)、或单纯全麻组(D),每组20人。所有病人在全凭静脉麻醉下手术,入室后行硬膜外穿刺置管,术后均采用硬膜外镇痛。A组病人在诱导后、切皮前予乌司他丁20万U,然后以20万U/h持续泵入至手术结束;B组病人在手术前(约15-20min)于硬膜外腔予1%罗哌卡因5ml,之后每45-60min追加5-10ml至手术结束;C组病人联合A组和B组的方案;D组不予其他干预。记录病人的一般情况,包括年龄、性别、体重、身高、ASA分级、手术方式、手术时间和术中失血量;记录疼痛情况,包括术后第一次额外使用镇痛药的时间、PCA的有效按压次数和实际按压次数、术前和术后第1、2、3、7天安静和活动下的VAS评分;于术前及术后第1、3、7天取静脉血测IL-6、IL-10的浓度。结果 四组患者的一般情况组间无差异(P>0.05)。炎性因子方面:术前四组患者的IL-6、IL-10浓度是相似的(P>0.05);术后(第七天较术前),IL-6水平:A组(14.84%)和C组(25.92%)下降,C组下降的幅度更大,B组变化不大(升高3.34%),D组升高(10.50%)。IL-10水平:A组(12.17%)和C组(62.65%)升高,C组升高的幅度更大,B组几乎无改变(下降3.40%),而D组下降(23.12%)。总的来说,抗炎能力:C组>A组>B组>D组。镇痛情况:第一次额外使用镇痛药的时间(h)A组(6.45±15.53)和D组(2.53±1.57)明显早于B组(17.66±19.21)和C组(23.80±25.13)(P<0.01),PCA的实际按压次数D组明显多于其他三组(8.20±8.12 vs. 8.55±9.27 vs. 7.50±8.43 vs. 15.20±12.20,P<0.05)。VAS评分:术前安静或活动状态下四组病人均无显著性差异(P>0.05);安静状态下,四组均达到了满意镇痛(即VAS<3),但是D组术后VAS评分始终高于其他三组(P<0.0 5);活动状态下,除D组外,其他三组都逐步达到了满意镇痛,但是D组于术后第七天仍未能降至3以下,与其他三组构成显著性差异(P<0.0 5)。总的来说,镇痛效果:C组>B组>C组>D组。 结论 术中使用乌司他丁调节全身炎性反应有助于在一定程度上减轻术后疼痛,其效果较术前就开始使用硬膜外麻醉弱,但联合使用上述两种方法能产生比单一使用更佳的结果。

关键词: 乌司他丁;全身炎症反应综合征;超前镇痛;白细胞介素
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effect of ulinastatin (uli), a drug that can regulate the systemic inflammation response, on the preventive analgesia. Methods 80 patients aged 65-80, scheduled for selective orthopedic surgery on lower extremities were randomly divided into four groups of 20 each. After epidural catheterization, all patients were induced and maintained under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Every patient used patients-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) to relief the postoperative pain. Patients in group A received uli 2×105IU after induction and before skin incision, then were administered continuously at rate of 2×105IU/h until the end of the operation; Patients in group B were given 1%ropivacaine (5-10)ml in the epidural space 15-20min before surgery and additional (5-10)ml every 45-60min during the operation; Patients in group C combined the protocols of group A and group B. Group D was the control group. Every patient’s sex, age, weight, height, ASA classification, operation style, operation duration, blood loss, the first time of pressing the PCEA, and the frequency of effective or actual press on the PCEA were recorded. VAS was obtained at rest and with movement preoperatively and at 1, 2, 3, 7 days after surgery. Blood samples were taken preoperatively and at 1, 3, 7 days after surgery for determination of IL-6, IL-10. Results Sex, age, weight, height, ASA classification, operation style, operation duration, blood loss and the level of IL-6, IL-10 preoperatively were similar among the four groups(P>0.05). After surgery, the concentration of IL-6 decreased in group A and C, and increased in group B and D, while that of IL-10 increased in group A and C, decreased in group D, and had little change in group B(P<0.05). Before surgery, VAS, whether with movement or not, showed no significant difference among groups(P>0.05). At rest, all groups reached satisfactory analgesia (i.e. VAS<3), but the score of group D was higher than that of other groups at any days(P<0.05); while when with movement, all reached satisfactory analgesia except group D. VAS decreased at 1day postoperatively in group C, and at the 7 days it still failed to decreased below 3 in group D. Conclusion The use of uli to regulate the systemic inflammation response during the operation can relief postoperative pain to some extent,but its efficiency can not be compared with epidural anesthesia which has been confirmed to show a “preemptive analgesia” effect in the previous studies, while combining these two methods may lead a better outcome.

Key words: ulinastatin; systemic inflammatory response syndrome; preemptive analgesia; interleukin