国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2014, Issue (3): 8-8
    
帝视内窥镜与Macintosh直接喉镜应用于强直性脊柱炎患者气管插管的比较
许小平, 范晓华, 杨涛, 李金宝, 邓小明1()
1.上海市长海医院
Comparison of Discopo with Macintosh blade for orotracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较Macintosh直接喉镜和帝视内窥镜用于强直性脊柱炎患者经口气管插管对声门暴露的程度和插管成功率,探讨Discopo帝视内窥镜在强直性脊柱炎患者中的应用价值。 方法 选择24例ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ级、拟在经口气管插管全身麻醉下实施择期手术的强直性脊柱炎患者,在实施全身麻醉诱导后进行经口气管插管操作。随机应用Macintosh直接喉镜或帝视内窥镜分别显露声门并记录Cormack-Lehane分级(C/L分级)。第1种喉镜显露喉部结构后不行气管插管退出喉镜,用第2种喉镜进行声门显露,记录C/L分级并行气管插管,记录气管插管时间和气管插管成功率。结果 帝视内窥镜声门显露程度(C/L分级)优于Macintosh直接喉镜(P<0.05)。Macintosh直接喉镜声门暴露时间和气管插管时间分别为(16.3±7.6)s和(45.2±43.2)s,帝视内窥镜声门暴露时间和气管插管时间分别为(12.9±5.9)s和(14.5±3.2)s,两者比较均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Macintosh直接喉镜组气管插管成功率为83.3%(10/12),帝视内窥镜组气管插管成功率为100%(12/12)(P<0.05)。结论 采用帝视内窥镜引导强直性脊柱炎患者经口气管插管可以在更短时间内更容易地显露声门,并提高气管插管成功率,在强直性脊柱炎患者气管插管的处理上具有一定优势。

关键词: 帝视内窥镜;Macintosh直接喉镜;气管插管;插管时间
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of Discopo in orotracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by comparing intubation time and successful rate between Macintosh blade and Discopo. Methods 24 patients (ASAⅠ~Ⅱ) with ankylosing spondylitis scheduled for elective operation under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were investigated. After induction and complete muscle relaxation, repeated laryngoscopy was performed using Macintosh blade and Discopo in randomized sequence before patients were intubated with the other intubation laryngoscope. Information including patient’s characteristics (age, sex, BMI) and airway assessment features (Mallampati oropharyngeal grade, thyromental distance and mouth opening) were collected. Cormark-Lehane Grade (C/L Grade), best achievable glottic exposure time, orotracheal intubation time, and intubation successful rate were recorded. Results Discopo achieved better C/L Grade than Macintosh blade (P<0.05). Insufficient glottic exposure, defined as C/L Grade≥Ⅲ, was experienced in 13 patients (54.2%) with Macintosh blade while none with Discopo. Both best achievable glottic exposure time and inbutation time with Discopo [(12.9±5.9) s and (14.5±3.2) s] were less than those with Macintosh blade [(16.3±7.6) s and (45.2±43.2) s, P<0.05]. The successful rate of intubation with Discopo(100%) was higher than Macintosh blade (83.3%, P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with direct Macintosh blade, Discopo could achieve a better glottic exposure by less time and higher successful rate of orotracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Key words: Discopo; Macintosh blade; tracheal intubation; intubation time