国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2014, Issue (5): 4-4
    
不同剂量的右美托咪定在剖宫产术后硬膜外镇痛的应用
赵侠勇, 薛荣亮, 吴刚, 王晓娟, 董小章, 张慧1()
1.西安交通大学第二附属医院
Different doses of dexmedetomidine in the application of epidural analgesia after caesarean section
 全文:
摘要:

目的 观察不同剂量的右美托咪定(dexmedetomidine, Dex)与罗哌卡因、芬太尼用于剖宫产术后自控硬膜外镇痛(patient controlled epidural analgesia, PCEA)的效果、应激反应及安全性。 方法 将80例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级行剖宫产术后镇痛的患者,根据Dex不同剂量采用随机数字表法随机分为4组(每组20例):A组(0)、B组(0.5 mg/L)、C组(0.8 mg/L)、D组(1.5 mg/L),A组为对照组,其余组为实验组;4组分别联合罗哌卡因(1.5 g/L)与芬太尼(2 mg/L)行PCEA。记录术后各时点6、12、24、48 h的镇痛视觉模拟(visual analogue scale, VAS)评分、用药量、总按压次数、有效按压次数、平均动脉压、心率、感觉、运动阻滞程度(Bromage评分)、镇静程度(Ramsay评分)及副作用(恶心、呕吐、皮肤瘙痒、术后寒战等)。记录术前及术后各时点6、12、24、48 h的皮质醇(cortisol, Cor) 和血糖( blood glucose, Glu)数值。 结果 B、C、D组VAS评分在各时间点均明显低于对照组(A组) (P<0.05),其中术后12 h时B、C组静态VAS分值[(1.7±0.9),(1.6±0.6)]、动态VAS分值[(3.3±0.7),(3.4±0.5)]比较差异有统计学意义,而B组和C组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。各组各时点Cor和Glu指标:B、C两组术后12 h Cor[(26.3±7.6)、(26.2±8.3) mg/L]和术后6 h Glu[(6.4±2.4)、(6.2±2.4) mmol/L]与A 组比较,差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05)。48 h时总用药量、总按压次数、有效按压次数,A组明显高于其他组 (P<0.05)。另外4组平均血压、双下肢运动未见明显异常,对照组A副作用率明显高于其他组。但D组有4例患者局部皮肤麻木感,有1例患者嗜睡,有1例患者出现心动过缓。 结论 Dex辅助用于剖宫产术后硬膜外镇痛时,明显增加了术后镇痛效果,减轻了机体应激反应,降低了副作用发生率和总用药量。Dex在浓度0.5 mg/L~0.8 mg/L时,其镇痛效果、应激反应、副作用发生率差异均无统计学意义,并且安全。

关键词: 右美托咪定; 剖宫产; 术后自控硬膜外镇痛
Abstract:

Objective To observe the effects, stress response and safety of different doses of dexmedetomidine(Dex) on epidural analgesia after caesarean section. Methods According to different doses of the Dex, 80 cesarean section patients with ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱwere averagely divided into four groups by random number table method: A(0), B(0.5 mg/L), C(0.8 mg/L), D(1.5 mg/L), with A being the control group. Every group was separately combined with 0.15% ropivacaine and fentanyl (2 mg/L) for patient controlled epidural analgesia(PCEA). The visual analogue scale (VAS), drug consumption, total press numbers, effective press numbers, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, sensation, Motor block level(Bromage score), Sedation degree(Ramsay score) at 6, 12, 24, 48 h after caesarean section and the side effect(nausea and vomiting and pruritis, shiver etc) were recorded. The date of the cortisol(Cor) and blood glucose(Glu) at preoperative and 6, 12, 24, 48 h after caesarean section was also recorded. Results B,C,D groups showed lower score than A group in visual analogue scale(P<0.05) and the difference between static VAS score[(1.7±0.9),(1.6±0.6)] and dynamic VAS score[(3.3±0.7),(3.4±0.5) ] of B and C groups had remarkable statistical significance 12 h postoperatively, but there were no significance between B and C groups(P>0.05). At 6,12 h Cor and Glu postoperatively there was an evident statistical significance(P<0.05) between B,C groups and A group. Compared with 48 h drug consumption, total press numbers, effective press numbers, A group is significantly higher than other groups (P<0.05), while B group and C group had no statistical significance (P>0.05). Besides, There were no obvious abnormal in the average blood pressure and the motion function of both lower extremities. Moreover, adverse reaction rate of A group is significantly higher than other groups. In D group, 4 cases suffered from local skin numbness,1 case lethargy and 1 case bradycardia. Conclusions Dex significantly enhanced the effect of analgesia, decreased stress response and reduced adverse reaction rate and total drug comsunption on epidural analgesia after caesarean section. The experiment also showed concentration of dexmedetomidine in 0.5 mg/L-0.8 mg/L was same effect of epidural analgesia and the more safety with comparison of concentration of dexmedetomidine in 0.8 mg/L-1.5 mg/L.

Key words: Dexmedetomidine; Caesarean section; Patient controlled epidural analgesia