国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2015, Issue (7): 10-10
    
I-Gel喉罩联合气管导管和支气管封堵器在食道癌根治术单肺通气中的应用
王瑞明1()
1.安徽省立医院麻醉科
The application of I-Gel laryngeal mask combined with endotracheal tube and bronchial blocker in esophageal cancer radical prostatectomy for one-lung ventilation
 全文:
摘要:

目的:探讨I-Gel喉罩(I-Gel laryngeal mask)联合气管导管和支气管封堵器(bronchial blocker )在食道癌根治术单肺通气的可行性和效果。方法:择期行食道癌根治手术患者60例,年龄40~80岁,ASA分级Ⅰ~Ⅲ级,采用随机数字表法分为三组(每组20例):双腔支气管导管组(D组)、单腔气管导管联合支气管封堵器组(B组)、I-Gel喉罩联合气管导管和支气管封堵器组(I组)。记录各组支气管封堵器或者双腔支气管导管的定位时间、术中支气管封堵器或者双腔支气管导管移位的次数、肺萎陷的程度及单肺通气的气道峰压、记录诱导前、气管插管或喉罩置入前、气管插管或喉罩置入后1min、5min、术后气管导管或者喉罩拔除前5 min、拔管或者喉罩拔除后1、5 min((T0-6))患者的血压、心率及拔管或喉罩的呛咳及术后2天内患者咽痛、声嘶等不良反应。结果: I组除T1时点SBP和DBP(117±9, 65±9 mmHg )低于术前(145±12, 75±9 mmHg) (P<0.05)外,诱导期间及术后恢复期各时点患者血压与术前相比无明显波动(P>0.05),B组和D组麻醉插管后及术后恢复期T2-6时点患者心率及血压高于术前(P<0.05),I组(0例)拔管期间呛咳反应少于B组(8例)和D组 (15例) (P<0.05),I组(0例)术后咽痛和声嘶的发生例数低于D组(16例)、B组(7例) (P<0.05)。I组(4.2±1.2min )定位时间长于B组(2.8±0.7min)和D组(2.7±0.4 ) (P<0.05),D组、B组和I组术中移位例数及肺萎陷程度相似 (P>0.05),I组(22±3mmHg)和B组(21±4 mmHg)单肺通气期间气道峰压力低于于D组( 28±4 mmHg) (P<0.05),而I组和B组气道峰压统计学无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:I-Gel喉罩联合气管导管和支气管封堵器可减轻全麻诱导期和苏醒期的刺激,可安全用于食道癌根治术中气管管理。

关键词: I-Gel喉罩 气管导管 支气管封堵器 食道癌根治术 单肺通气
Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of I-Gel laryngeal mask combined with endotracheal tube/ bronchial blocker in patients undergoing esophageal cancer radical prostatectomy for one-lung ventilation. Methods: sixty patients aged 40 to 80 years old, ASAⅠ~Ⅲ, undergoing selective esophageal cancer radical surgery, were randomly divided into three groups(n=30): double-lumen tube group, endotracheal tube with bronchial blocker group (B group), I-Gel laryngeal mask with endotracheal tube and bronchial blocker (I group). The variables were recorded including the time required to achieve the optimal positioning of the device, efficiency of lung collapse and perioperative malposition frequency of double-lumen tubes/ bronchial blockers and the airway pressure(PAW) during one-lung ventilation. The blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before anesthesia, immediately before induction, 1 minute and 5 minutes after intubation, 5 minute before extubation and 1 minute, 5 minutes after extubation(T0-6). The complications of bucking during extubation and pharyngalgia and hoarseness in two days after the surgery were recorded. Results: No obvious fluctuation of BP and HR were seen in I group during the period of induction and extubation except the time of T1(SBP: 117±9 vs 145±12; DBP:65±9 vs75±9, P<0.05). The BP and HR at the time of T2-6 in D Group and B group were high than the baseline (To). The bucking frequency during extubationand pharyngalgia/hoarseness in two days after the surgery in B group and D group were high than I group (0 vs 8,15, P<0.05) (0 vs16,7, P<0.05 ). The positioning time of I group was longer than B group and D Group’s(4.2±1.2 vs 2.8±0.7,2.7±0.4 ) (P<0.05). There were no significant difference in efficiency of lung collapse (8.9±1.2,8.35±1.3,8.4±1.3) (P>0.05) and perioperative malposition frequency of double-lumen tubes/ bronchial blockers between I Group, D Group and B group(4,2,3) (P>0.05). The PAW of D Group was higher than I group’s and B group’s (22±3,21±4 vs 28±4) (P>0.05). Conclusion:I-Gel laryngeal mask with endotracheal tube and bronchial blocker can decrease stimulation of the induction and revival period in full anesthesia, can safely used in in patients undergoing esophageal cancer radical prostatectomy for one-lung ventilation.

Key words: I-Gel laryngeal mask endotracheal tube bronchial blocker esophageal cancer radical prostatectomy one-lung ventilation