国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2016, Issue (2): 7-7
    
SD大鼠腹腔注射α2受体阻滞剂——育亨宾对地佐辛镇痛作用的影响
王敏, 周学龙, 王寅, 郁丽娜, 严敏1()
1.徐州医学院江苏省麻醉学重点实验室
Impact of intraperitoneal injection of yohimbine, an α2 receptor antagonist, on the analgesia effect of dezocine in SD rats
 全文:
摘要:

目的 观察腹腔注射α2受体阻滞剂——育亨宾对地佐辛镇痛效应的影响。 方法 80只雄性SD大鼠按随机数字表法分为8组(每组10只):A1组、B1组、C1组、D1组、A2组、B2组、C2组和D2组。A1组、B1组、C1组和D1组采用足底注射弗氏完全佐剂(complete freund′s adjuvant, CFA)的方法制备大鼠慢性炎性疼痛模型,并于造模后第3天分别腹腔给予生理盐水、地佐辛(2.5 mg/kg)、育亨宾+地佐辛(2.5 mg/kg+2.5 mg/kg)和育亨宾(2.5 mg/kg),给药后0.5 h测定各组大鼠的热缩足反射潜伏期(thermal withdrawal latency, TWL)与机械缩足反射阈值(paw withdrawal threshold, PWT)。A2组、B2组、C2组和D2组采用坐骨神经慢性压迫法(chronic constriction injury, CCI)建立大鼠神经病理性疼痛模型,并于造模后第7天分别腹腔给予生理盐水、地佐辛(2.5 mg/kg)、育亨宾+地佐辛(2.5 mg/kg+2.5 mg/kg)和育亨宾(2.5 mg/kg),给药后0.5 h测定各组大鼠的TWL与PWT。 结果 与A1组[(8.3±2.0) s,(5.0±1.6) g]比较,B1组[(16.7±3.2) s,(12.1±2.0) g]与C1组[(12.3±3.5)s,(7.8±3.3) g]大鼠的TWL与PWT显著升高(P<0.05),而D1组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与B1组比较,C1组大鼠的TWL与PWT显著降低(P<0.05)。与A2组[(6.2±1.9) s,(4.6±1.5) g]比较,B2组[(11.3±3.0) s,(11.4±3.3) g]与C2组[(8.7±1.6) s,(6.4±0.7) g]大鼠的TWL与PWT显著升高(P<0.05),而D2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与B2组比较,C2组大鼠的TWL与PWT显著降低(P<0.05)。 结论 在慢性炎性疼痛和神经病理性疼痛中,腹腔注射α2受体阻滞剂可以减弱地佐辛的镇痛作用。

关键词: 地佐辛; α2受体阻滞剂; 炎性疼痛; 神经病理性疼痛
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effect of intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) of yohimbine, an α2-receptor antagonist, on the analgesia effect of dezocine in rats. Methods Eighty male SD rats were randomly divided into 8 groups (n=10): group A1, group B1, group C1, group D1, group A2, group B2, group C2, and group D2. Plantar injection of complete freund′s adjuvant (CFA) was used to induce chronic inflammatory pain in group A1, group B1, group C1, and groupD1. Saline, dezocine (2.5 mg/kg), dezocine (2.5 mg/kg) plus yohimbine (2.5 mg/kg), and yohimbine (2.5 mg/kg) were injected intraperitoneally at 3 d after establishment of disease models, respectively. Thermal withdrawal latency (TWL) and paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) were measured at 30 min after the injection. Chronic constriction injury (CCI) of sciatic nerve was used to induce neuropathic pain in group A2, group B2, group C2, and group D2. Saline, dezocine (2.5 mg/kg), dezocine (2.5 mg/kg) plus yohimbine (2.5 mg/kg), and yohimbine (2.5 mg/kg) were injected intraperitoneally at 7 d after establishment of disease models, respectively. TWL and PWT were measured at 30 min after the injection. Results TWL and PWT were significantly increased in group B1 [(16.7±3.2) s, (12.1±2.0) g] and group C1 [(12.3±3.5) s, (7.8±3.3) g] compared with group A1 [ (8.3±2.0) s, (5.0±1.6) g ] (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was examined between group A1 and group D1 (P>0.05). TWL and PWT were significantly reduced in group C1 compared with group B1(P<0.05). TWL and PWT were significantly increased in group B2 [(11.3±3.0) s, (11.4±3.3) g] and group C2 [(8.7±1.6) s, (6.4±0.7) g] compared with group A2 [(6.2±1.9) s, (4.6±1.5) g] (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was examined between group A2 and group D2 (P>0.05)TWL and PWT were significantly reduced in group C2 compared with group B2(P<0.05). Conclusions Intraperitoneal injection of yohimbine reduced the analgesia effect of dezocine under the chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain conditions in rats.

Key words: Dezocine; α2 receptor antagonist; Inflammatory pain; Neuropathic pain