国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2017, Issue (11): 7-7
    
围手术期炎症标志物与术后认知功能障碍相关性的Meta分析
赵鹏程, 姜虹1()
1.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院
Association between peripheral inflammatory markers and postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a Meta-analysis
 全文:
摘要:

目的 应用询证医学方法系统评价围手术期炎症标志物水平与术后认知功能障碍(postoperative cognitive dysfunction, POCD)之间的相关性,为临床预测POCD的发生提供依据。 方法 检索PubMed、The Cochrane Library、EMBASE、ISI Web of Knowledge、Google Scholar、百度学术、CNKI数据库、维普数据库和万方医学网。文献检索时间从建库至2015年11月,查找对POCD及非POCD患者血清炎症标志物指标进行检测的相关病例对照研究,采用Review Manager 5.1、STATA12.0软件进行分析。采用随机效应模型,计算每项指标的标准化均数差(standardized mean difference, SMD)及95%CI。并对研究结果分别进行回归分析、发表偏倚检验、异质性检验。 结果 共有15项符合条件的研究被纳入。在POCD及非POCD患者术后血清炎症标志物浓度的比较中,POCD组患者血清有着更高浓度的S-100β蛋白[SMD(95%CI):1.82(0.90~2.74),P<0.001,N(POCD/非POCD)=195/431,8篇研究]和IL-6[SMD(95%CI):1.35(0.67~2.02),P<0.001,N(POCD/非POCD)=128/162,6篇研究],但两组患者的神经元特异性烯醇化酶(neuron-specific enolase, NSE)、IL-1β、TNF-α浓度无显著增高(P>0.05)。线性回归分析发现POCD患者和非POCD患者术后IL-6以及S-100β蛋白的SMD和POCD患者术前IL-6以及S-100β蛋白外周血浓度无显著正相关性。 结论 POCD的发生与术后外周血炎症标记物浓度有关,尤其与IL-6和S-100β密切相关;但是IL-6和S-100β蛋白的术前血清浓度不能作为术后是否发生POCD的预测指标。

关键词: 炎症标志物; 术后认知功能障碍; 白细胞介素-6; S-100β
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the correlation between perioperative inflammatory markers and postoperative cognitive dysfunction by using the method of evidence-based medicine. And to provide the basis for the clinical prediction of postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD). Methods An online search was performed to identify peer-reviewed studies without language restriction that measured peripheral inflammatory markers of patients with and without POCD, using PubMed, Tthe Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Baidu scholar, CNKI, Weipu and Wanfang. Extracted data were analyzed with Review Manager (version 5.1), STATA (version 12.0). The standardized mean difference(SMD) and the 95%CI were calculated for each outcome using a random effect model. Tests of heterogeneity assessment of bias, and Meta-regression were performed in the Meta-analysis. Results A total of 15 studies that measured the concentrations of peripheral inflammatory markers were included. The current Meta-analysis found significantly higher concentrations of S-100β [SMD (95%CI)]: 1.82 (0.90-2.74), P<0.001, N(POCD/non-POCD)=195/431, 8 studies), and IL-6[SMD (95%CI): 1.35(0.67-2.02), P<0.001, N(POCD/non-POCD)=128/162, 6 studies). But compared with patients without POCD, there was no significant increasing of neuron specific enolase(NSE), IL-1β, or TNF-α were found in POCD patients. In Meta-regression analyses, we didn't find a significant positive association between the SMD and the preoperative IL-6 or S-100β peripheral blood concentration in patients with POCD. Conclusions This study shows that POCD is indeed correlated with the concentrations of peripheral inflammatory markers, particularly IL-6 and S-100β, but the preoperative concentration of IL-6 and S-100β cannot be used as a predictor of POCD. Conclusions This study shows that POCD is indeed correlated with the concentrations of peripheral inflammatory markers, particularly interleukin-6 and S-100β, but the preoperative concentration of interleukin-6 and S-100β cannot be used as a predictor of POCD.

Key words: Inflammatory markers; Postoperative cognitive dysfunction; Interleukin-6; S-100β; Meta-analysis