国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2017, Issue (3): 0-0
    
监测麻醉深度对老年患者术后认知功能的影响
曹桂林, 张建欣, 张传阳, 盖殿秀1()
1.解放军第一四八中心医院
The Effect of Monitoring the Anesthetic Depth to the Gerontal Patients about Cognitive Function after General Anesthesia
 全文:
摘要:

【摘要】 目的 探讨使用听觉诱发电位指数(A-line ARX-index, AAI)、脑电双频指数(bispectral index, BIS)监测麻醉深度对老年患者全麻行全膝关节置换术后认知功能的影响。 方法 择期全麻下行全膝关节置换术老年患者60例,年龄65~75岁,体重45~85kg,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法将患者分为3组,每组20例:使用AAI监测麻醉深度组(AAI组)、使用BIS监测麻醉深度组(BIS组)和五年以上麻醉医师经验调控麻醉深度组(CON组)。于术前1d和术后1d、3d、5d、7d行简明精神状态量表(MMSE)评分,以此评估患者认知功能;记录三组患者的全麻药物用量,术毕时患者的苏醒时间、拔管时间、警觉镇静评分和疼痛视觉模拟评分。 结果 与CON组比较,AAI和BIS两组的丙泊酚用量[(450±19)、(500±18)mg]及瑞芬太尼用量[(0.78±0.07)、(0.80±0.08)mg ]比CON组[ 丙泊酚(810±17)、瑞芬太尼(1.26±0.07)mg ]少,AAI组的丙泊酚用量比BIS组更少,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义;术毕AAI和BIS两组的苏醒时间[5.4±1.5)、(10.2±1.3)min]和拔管时间[(7.3±1.6)、(14.5±1.5)min],比CON组[ 苏醒时间(15.3±1.8)、拔管时间(18.2±1.7)min ] 短,警觉镇静评分[ AAI组(4.45±0.35)、BIS组(3.74±0.43)、CON组(2.85±0.24)]高(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义;3组术前1d 时MMSE评分比较无统计学差异 ( P>0.05);AAI、BIS两组术后1d、3d、5d、7d各时点的MMSE评分与CON组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 应用麻醉深度监测可以节俭麻醉药用量,缩短苏醒和拔管时间,但是对术后认知功能量表(MMSE)没有明显影响。

关键词: 听觉诱发电位指数、脑电双频指数、麻醉深度、老年、全膝关节置换、术后认知功能障碍
Abstract:

【Abstract】 Objective To explore the effects of anesthetic depth regulated by AAI and BIS on cognitive function in gerontal patients suffering total knee replacement surgery under general anesthesia. Methods Sixty old patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery , aged 65-75 yr , weighing 45-85 kg, ASA physical status Ⅰor Ⅱ; The random digits table method was used to divide patients into AAI group, BIS group and contract group(CON group), and 20 cases were dispatched randomly in each group. At 1 day before and 1 day, 3 day, 5 day, 7 day after operation, cognitive function were assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination and the scores were recorded . The recovery time of patients after operation, extubation time, the observer’s assessment of alertness/sedation(OAA/S) scale and visual analogue scale (VAS) were recorded. the total drug dosage during general anesthesia were also recorded. Results Compared with group CON[Propofol(810±17), remifentanil(1.26±0.07)mg], the propofol dosage [ Group AAI(450±19), Group BIS(500±18)mg]and the remifentanil dosage[Group AAI(0.78±0.07), Group BIS(0.80±0.08)mg ] were less, and group AAI was more less than Group BIS(P<0.05). The patient's awakening time [Group AAI (5.4±1.5), Group BIS(10.2±1.3)min] and the extubation time [Group AAI (7.3±1.6), Group BIS(14.5±1.5)min ] were shorter than that of Group CON [Awakening time (15.3±1.8), Extubation time(18.2±1.7)min ] (P<0.05), and the alertness sedation score [Group AAI(4.45±0.35), Group BIS(3.74±0.43)] were higher than that of Group CON(2.85±0.24)(P<0.05). There were no significant differences among three groups in the MMSE scores of each test used for assessment of cognitive function before operation. And there were no significant differences about the scores of MMSE of every group from the first day to the seventh day(P>0.05). Conclusions Application of anesthetic depth monitoring can reduce the dosage of anesthetic, shorten the awakening time and extubation time, but have no significant effect on the postoperative cognitive function scale (MMSE).

Key words: AAI;BIS;anesthetic depth;gerontism;total knee replacement;postoperative cognitive dysfunction