国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2019, Issue (10): 5-5
    
气管导管外放置Coopdech支气管阻塞器在婴幼儿单肺通气中的应用
雷晓鸣, 镇路明, 熊虹飞, 孟丽华, 蒋文军, 郭亚乐, 张珍妮1()
1.西安交通大学医学院第二附属医院
Application of Coopdech endobronchial blocker outside endotracheal tube in infants and young children with one lung ventilation
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较气管导管外放置Coopdech支气管阻断器和单腔气管导管在婴幼儿胸腔镜手术的单肺通气效果。 方法 采用随机数字表法将40例择期行肺部分切除术的先天性肺囊性病变的患儿分为Coopdech支气管阻断器组(C组)和单腔气管导管组(E组),每组20例。纤维支气管镜引导下,C组患儿气管导管外放置Coopdech支气管阻塞导管进入患侧,E组患儿将单腔气管导管置入健侧。观察肺萎陷程度,记录肺萎陷优良率和肺萎陷时间。记录两组患儿双肺通气5 min(T1)、单肺通气20 min(T2)、单肺通气40 min(T3)、单肺通气60 min(T4)时MAP、心率、PaO2、PaCO2及气道压力(airway pressure, Paw)变化。记录首次插管成功率、插管时间、单肺通气时间、手术时间、苏醒时间等。 结果 两组患儿肺萎陷优良率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),C组术侧肺萎陷时间明显长于E组(P<0.05)。两组患儿各时点MAP、心率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);C组T2、T3和T4时PaO2明显高于E组(P<0.05),PaCO2、Paw明显低于E组(P<0.05)。C组首次插管成功率明显高于E组(P<0.05),插管时间和手术时间明显短于E组(P<0.05);两组患儿单肺通气时间和苏醒时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 与单腔气管导管比较,经纤维支气管镜定位,气管导管外放置Coopdech支气管阻断器,在先天性肺囊性病变的婴幼儿胸腔镜手术中能提供更好的单肺通气效果。

关键词: Coopdech支气管阻断器; 单腔气管导管; 婴幼儿; 单肺通气; 胸腔镜
Abstract:

Objective To compare the effects of Coopdech endobronchial blocker placed outside the endotracheal tube and single lumen endotracheal tube on the one-lung ventilation in infants and young children undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Methods A total of 40 children with congenital pulmonary cystic lesions who underwent elective partial pulmonary resection were randomly divided into a Coopdech bronchoblocker group (group C) and a single-lumen endotracheal tube group (group E) (n=20). Under a fiberoptic bronchoscope, Coopdech endobronchial blocker was placed outside the endotracheal tube into the affected side in group C, and single-lumen tube was placed into the unaffected side in group E. The degree of lung collapse was observed, the rate of excellent cases of lung collapse and lung collapse time were recorded. The changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and airway pressure (Paw) were recorded 5 min after dual-lung ventilation (T1), 20 min after one lung ventilation (T2), 40 min after one lung ventilation (T3), and 60 min after one lung ventilation (T4) were recorded. The success rate of first intubation, intubation time, one lung ventilation time, operation time, recovery time were recorded. Results There was no significant difference in the excellent rate of lung collapse between the two groups (P>0.05). The lung collapse time in group C was significantly longer than that in group E (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in MAP, heart rate between the two groups (P>0.05). At T2, T3 and T4, PaO2 in group C was significantly higher than that in group E (P<0.05), and PaCO2 and Paw were significantly lower than those in group E (P<0.05). The success rate of first intubation in group C was significantly higher than that in group E (P<0.05), the intubation time and the operation time were shorter than that in group E (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the one lung ventilation time and recovery time between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Compared with single lumen endotracheal tube, the Coopdech endobronchial blocker which is placed outside the endotracheal tube through fiberoptic bronchoscopy can provide better one-lung ventilation effect in infant and young children with congenital pulmonary cystic lesions undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.

Key words: Coopdech endobronchial blocker; Single lumen endotracheal tube; Infants; One lung ventilation; Thoracoscopy