国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2020, Issue (8): 0-0
    
洗涤式血液回收用于前置胎盘产妇剖宫产术的回顾性队列研究
田亮, 张杰 , 张鹏, 吕倩茹, 李朝阳1()
1.华中科技大学协和深圳医院(南山医院)
Intraoperative Blood Salvage for Puerpera Underwent Cesarean Section with Placenta Previa: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 全文:
摘要:

目的 拟评价洗涤式血液回收用于前置胎盘产妇剖宫产术的有效性、安全性及经济效益。方法 回顾2017年1月-2019年1月于我院行剖宫产术并在术前经超声或MRI明确诊断为前置胎盘的产妇。依据术中是否使用洗涤式血液回收分为干预组(intervention group, I组)和对照组(control group, C组),其中I组40例,C组41例。I组产妇于术前准备全自动洗涤式自体血液回收;C组产妇术中不使用洗涤式血液回收,若满足输血指征则输注异体血。回顾产妇年龄、血常规、凝血相关指标等术前资料;术中出血量、异体血制品输注情况等术中资料及术后出血量、产后出血发生率等术后资料。结果 两组产妇术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。I组产妇术中平均自体血回输量为(350.1±88.3)mL。I组、C组分别有16名、35名产妇输注异体RBC,I组产妇异体RBC输注率、RBC输注量明显低于C组产妇,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组产妇FFP输注率、输注量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。产妇术后Hb、RBC、PLT较同组术前均明显降低,而术后PT、APTT、FIB、TT较同组术前均明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组产妇术后Hb、RBC、PLT及PT、APTT、FIB、TT差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组产妇术后出血量及PPH、切口感染、盆腔血肿发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 对于合并前置胎盘行剖宫产术的产妇而言,洗涤式血液回收能够显著减少术中异体输血率及异体输血量,并且不增加产妇术后不良事件发生风险,但明显增加产妇输血相关费用。

关键词: 术中血液回收;自体输血;前置胎盘;剖宫产术;回顾性队列研究;
Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the effect of blood salvage for puerpera underwent cesarean section with placenta previa. Methods: To review the puerpera who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 and were clearly diagnosed as placenta previa by ultrasound or MRI. The intervention group (group I) and control group (group C) are divided depending on whether using blood salvage or not, with 40 cases in group I and 41 cases in group C. The puerpera in group I received automatic washing autologous blood salvage; Group C did not use blood salvage and allogeneic blood was transfused if blood transfusion indications were met. Preoperative data including age, blood routine and coagulation related indexes were reviewed. Intraoperative blood loss, transfusion of allogeneic blood products and other postoperative data such as postoperative blood loss, incidence of postpartum hemorrhage were reviewed. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of intraoperative bleeding between the two groups (P0.05). The average amount of autologous blood transfusion in group I was (350.1±88.3) mL . There were 16 and 35 patients in group I and C receiving allogeneic RBC infusion, respectively. The infusion rate and volume of allogeneic RBC infusion in group I was significantly lower than that in group C, with statistically significant differences (P0.05). There was no significant difference in FFP infusion rate and infusion volume between the two groups (P0.05). Hb, RBC and PLT were significantly decreased, while PT, APTT, FIB and TT were significantly increased after operation (P0.05). There was no significant difference in Hb, RBC, PLT, PT, APTT, FIB and TT between the two groups (P0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in postpartum blood loss, PPH, incision infection, and incidence of pelvic hematoma between the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion: For puerpera undergoing cesarean section with placenta previa, blood salvage can significantly reduce the rate of allogeneic blood transfusion and allogeneic blood transfusion volume during the operation, and does not increase the risk of adverse events after the operation, but significantly increase the related costs of blood transfusion.

Key words: intraoperative blood salvage; autologous blood transfusion; placenta previa; cesarean section; retrospective cohort study