国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2020, Issue (11): 0-0
    
蛛网膜下腔‑硬膜外联合阻滞分娩镇痛对剖宫产术后阴道试产母婴结局影响的回顾性临床研究
刘野, 徐铭军, 赵国胜, 王一男, 李秋红1()
1.首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院
A retrospective clinical study of the effects of combined spinal and epidural analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨蛛网膜下腔‑硬膜外联合阻滞(腰硬联合麻醉)分娩镇痛对剖宫产术后阴道试产(trial of labor after cesarean section, TOLAC)母婴结局的影响。 方法 回顾性分析2011年6月—2018年10月在首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院分娩的136例TOLAC产妇的临床资料。70例应用腰硬联合麻醉镇痛的产妇作为观察组,66例未采用镇痛干预的产妇作为对照组。观察并记录两组产妇镇痛前Bishop宫颈成熟度评分、第一产程时间、第二产程时间、器械助产例数、剖宫产例数、子宫破裂例数、不良反应发生情况及两组新生儿情况。 结果 观察组第一产程时间短于对照组[(401±39) min 比 (455±30) min,P<0.05],第二产程时间长于对照组[(45±16) min 比 (30±11) min,P<0.05],剖宫产率低于对照组(8.6% 比 18.2%,P<0.05);两组产妇镇痛前Bishop评分,使用缩宫素、器械助产、子宫破裂及产后出血发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组产妇皮肤瘙痒发生率高于对照组(10.0% 比 0,P<0.05),低血压、恶心呕吐、呼吸抑制发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组新生儿出生体重、1 min Apgar评分、pH值、PaO2、PaCO2、碱剩余比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 腰硬联合麻醉分娩镇痛可以明显解除TOLAC产妇在分娩中的剧烈产痛,降低剖宫产率,对新生儿结局无不利影响。

关键词: 腰硬联合麻醉; 分娩镇痛; 剖宫产术后阴道试产; 子宫破裂; 新生儿
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of combined spinal and epidural analgesia on maternal and infant outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC). Methods A total of 136 pregnant women who underwent TOLAC in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from June 2011 to October 2018 were enrolled, where 70 women receiving combined spinal and epidural analgesia were set as an observation group and 66 women without analgesia as a control group. Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Both groups were compared for their Bishop scores before analgesia, the first and second stage of labor, the number of device‑assisted delivery, the number of cesarean, the number of uterine rupture cases, adverse reactions and neonatal outcomes. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group presented shortened duration of the first stage of labor [(455±30) min vs (401±39) min, P<0.05], langer than nd second stage of labor [(30±11) min vs (45±16) min, P<0.05], with a decreased rate of cesarean (18.5% vs 8.6%, P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the Bishop score before analgesia, the use of oxytocin, the number of device‑assisted delivery, uterine rupture and the incidence of postoperative bleeding (P>0.05). Women in the observation group (10.0%) reported an increased rate of itchy skin compared with the control group (0) (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the number of hypotension, nausea and vomiting, and respiratory inhibition (P>0.05). There were no statistical difference among newborns in the two groups as to birth weight, 1 min Apgar score, pH value, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and residual alkaline (P>0.05). Conclusions Combined spinal and epidural block can significantly relieve labor pain during TOLAC's severe parturition during delivery, reduce cesarean rate, without no adverse effects on neonatal outcomes.

Key words: Combined spinal and epidural block; Labor analgesia; Trial of labor after cesarean section; Uterine rupture; Newborn