国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2020, Issue (9): 9-9
    
虚拟仿真模拟教学平台在麻醉学科住院医师培养中的应用与建设
肖淑媛, 王妍, 李会, 程宝莉, 叶慧, 王汉斌, 方向明1()
1.浙江大学医学院附属第一医院麻醉科
Application and construction of virtual simulation teaching platforms in the training for anesthesiology residents
 全文:
摘要:

目的 了解虚拟仿真模拟教学平台在我国高校麻醉学科住院医师培养中的应用,探讨虚拟仿真教学质量内涵建设的影响因素。 方法 对来自全国39所高校参加“第十六期教育部来华留学英语麻醉学师资培训”培训班的55名麻醉学教师进行了虚拟仿真课程培训,培训前后进行问卷调调查,因个别老师缺席致前后分别收到问卷52份(94.5%)和50份(90.9%)。问卷内容包括教师的基本资料、虚拟仿真教学在高校麻醉学教学中的应用情况、教师对虚拟仿真教学方法的了解程度、虚拟仿真培训前后教师对教授虚拟仿真课程的意愿和培训后教师开展虚拟仿真教学的能力。 结果 27名(51.9%)教师所在高校在麻醉学教学中应用了虚拟仿真教学方法;在开展虚拟仿真教学的高校中,20名(74.1%)教师所在高校的培训对象有住院医师。35名(67.3%)教师了解虚拟仿真教学。40名(76.9%)教师表示在实际教学中未采用过虚拟仿真教学。经过虚拟仿真课程培训后,教师对虚拟仿真教学重要性的认知提升,对教授虚拟仿真课程的意愿增加,对虚拟仿真教学的优势持有更积极的态度,同时提升了开展虚拟仿真教学的能力。 结论 我国虚拟仿真模拟教学平台在麻醉学科住院医师培养中应用普及不够,麻醉学师资对应用虚拟仿真教学方式的经验有待进一步积累。虚拟仿真教学培训对提高麻醉学师资团队的岗位胜任力有着关键的作用。加强麻醉学师资队伍中虚拟仿真教学的培训、增加虚拟仿真课程设置和技术支持等有可能推动虚拟仿真教学平台在麻醉学科住院医师培养的普及和均质化。

关键词: 虚拟仿真模拟教学平台; 麻醉学; 住院医师; 培养; 师资; 内涵建设
Abstract:

Objective This study aims to investigate the application of a virtual simulation teaching platform for the training anesthesiology residents in universities in China and to explore the factors that influence the quality of the virtual simulation teaching. Methods Fifty‑five anesthesiology teachers who participated in "the 16th Training Session of the Training Center for Medical (Anesthesiology) Teachers Teaching International Students in English Ministry of Education" from 39 universities in China were enrolled. A survey was administered as part of the virtual simulation curriculum. Due to the absence of individual teachers, 52 (94.5%) and 50 (90.9%) questionnaires were received before and after the courses, respectively. The content of the questionnaires included the general information of the teachers, the application of virtual simulation teaching method in anesthesiology teaching, the teachers' awareness of virtual simulation teaching, the willingness to teach virtual simulation courses before and after the virtual simulation training, and the ability of teachers to carry out virtual simulation teaching after the training. Results Overall, 27 (51.9%) teachers reported that their universities applied a virtual simulation teaching method in anesthesiology teaching. Among the universities that used virtual simulation teaching, 20 (74.1%) teachers reported that their universities' training objects were residents. Thirty‑five (67.3%) teachers knew about virtual simulation teaching. Forty (76.9%) teachers stated that they had not used the virtual simulation teaching in actual teaching. The present study also found that, after the training involving virtual simulation courses, the teachers' awareness of the importance of virtual simulation teaching was improved and their willingness to teach virtual simulation courses were increased. They had a more positive attitude toward the advantages of virtual simulation teaching while their ability to carry out virtual simulation teaching was promoted. Conclusions Virtual simulation teaching platforms have not been widely applied in anesthesiology residents training. Moreover, the experience of anesthesiology faculties in using virtual simulation teaching methods needs to be further improved. Furthermore, virtual simulation training plays a key role in improving the competency of anesthesiology faculty. Thus, strengthening the training of virtual simulation among anesthesiology faculties, and adding virtual simulation courses and technical support may promote the popularization and homogenization of virtual simulation teaching platforms in the training of anesthesiology residents.

Key words: Virtual simulation teaching platforms; Anesthesiology; Resident; Training; Faculty; Construction