国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2021, Issue (7): 0-0
    
舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因和右美托咪定联合 罗哌卡因在分娩镇痛中的效果比较
刘颖, 张海萍1()
1.四川省妇幼保健院
Comparison of the effectiveness of sufentanil combined with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in labor analgesia
 全文:
摘要:

目的比较舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因和右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因在分娩镇痛中的效果。方法选取2020年2 月—2021年2月四川省妇幼保健院收治的足月孕妇100例作为研究对象。根据随机数字表法将孕妇分为两组(每组50例):舒 芬太尼联合罗哌卡因组(SR组)和右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因组(DR组)。所有孕妇均接受持续硬膜外镇痛泵分娩镇痛。比较 两组孕妇镇痛前后的生命体征、镇痛前后VAS疼痛评分、产程、产后出血量、接泵后30 min的改良Bromage评分、产后初乳时 间、孕妇住院期间不良反应的发生情况及新生儿Apgar评分。结果镇痛后两组孕妇心率、MAP、VAS疼痛评分均低于镇痛 前(P<0.05)。两组间孕妇心率、MAP、呼吸频率、VAS疼痛评分、产后出血量及新生儿Apgar评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05)。两组孕妇改良Bromage评分均为0。DR组孕妇第二产程时间短于SR组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组孕妇产后 初乳时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。DR 组产妇发热发生率和总不良反应发生率低于SR 组,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。结论舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因和右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因在分娩镇痛中的镇痛效果和对于孕妇生命体征、下肢运 动神经阻滞程度、新生儿情况和泌乳方面的影响差异无统计学意义。但右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因可显著缩短第二产程,降低 分娩镇痛不良反应发生率,特别是在减少产妇发热方面具有一定意义。

关键词: 舒芬太尼; 罗哌卡因; 右美托咪定; 分娩镇痛; 产程
Abstract:

Objective To compare the effectiveness of sufentanil combined with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in labor analgesia. Methods A total of 100 full⁃term pregnant women who were admitted to Sichuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital from August 2019 to June 2020 were selected as the subjects. According to the random number table method, the pregnant women were divided into two groups (n=50): a sufentanil combined with ropivacaine (SR) group and a dexmedetomidine com⁃ bined with ropivacaine (DR) group. All pregnant women underwent continuous epidural analgesia for labor analgesia. Both groups were compared for vital signs and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score before and after analgesia. Their delivery process, the volume of blood loss, modified Bromage score 30 min after receiving the pump, newborn Apgar score, and postpartum colostrum time were also com⁃ pared. Meanwhile, the occurrence of adverse reactions during the hospitalization of pregnant women were recorded . Results After analgesia, both groups presented decreases in heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and VAS scores, compared with those before an⁃ algesia (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in heart rate, MAP, respiratory frequency, VAS score, the volume of blood loss and newborn Apgar score between the two groups (P>0.05). The modified Bromage score was 0 for pregnant women in both groups. The DR group showed shortened duration of the second stage of labor than the SR group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in postpar⁃ tum colostrum time between the two groups (P>0.05). The DR group presented decreases the incidence of maternal fever and the over⁃ all incidence of adverse reactions, compared with the SR group (P<0.05). Conclusions The combined use of sufentanil and ropiva⁃ caine has similar analgesic effects with dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine, with similarity in vital signs of pregnant women, the degree of lower limb motor nerve block, the condition of the newborns and lactation. However, dexmedetomidine combined with rop⁃ivacaine can significantly shorten the second stage of labor and reduce the incidence of adverse analgesia during labor, especially in re⁃ ducing the incidence of maternal fever.

Key words: Sufentanil; Ropivacaine; Dexmedetomidine; Labor analgesia; Labor process