国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2021, Issue (9): 2-2
    
超声引导下臭氧水注射治疗粘连性肩关节囊炎的临床效果观察
张学广, 申文1()
1.徐州医科大学麻醉学院
Clinical effect of ultrasound‑guided ozonated water injection treatment of the adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较超声引导下肩关节腔注射臭氧水与复方倍他米松镇痛液治疗粘连性肩关节囊炎(adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, ACS)的临床效果。 方法 选取2019年1月至2020年3月于徐州医科大学附属医院疼痛科就诊的ACS患者86例,采用随机数字表法分为臭氧水组(T组)和复方倍他米松镇痛液组(C组),每组43例。两组患者均接受肩关节腔注射治疗(每周1次,连续3次),记录治疗前及治疗后2周、1个月、3个月的疼痛数字评分(Numerical Rating Scale, NRS)及肩关节活动范围(range of motion, ROM),治疗后1个月、3个月的治疗有效率,治疗前及治疗后1个月、3个月的睡眠质量评分(Self‑Rating Scale of Sleep, SRSS),治疗后2周、1个月、3个月的镇痛药物使用情况及不良反应发生情况。 结果 两组患者治疗后各时点NRS、SRSS均低于治疗前,ROM(前屈、后伸、外展)均大于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后2周、1个月,两组间NRS及镇痛药物使用率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后3个月,T组NRS及镇痛药物使用率高于C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前后各时点,两组间ROM(前屈、后伸、外展)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后1个月,两组间治疗有效率及SRSS比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后3个月,T组治疗有效率低于C组、T组SRSS高于C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组共有6例患者治疗后出现短暂的疼痛加重,合并糖尿病的部分患者出现不同程度的血糖升高,无其他严重不良反应。 结论 超声引导下肩关节腔注射臭氧水和复方倍他米松镇痛液治疗ACS疗效显著,复方倍他米松镇痛液的中期疗效更佳。

关键词: 臭氧水; 粘连性肩关节囊炎; 关节腔注射; 疼痛
Abstract:

Objective To compare the clinical effect of ultrasound‑guided ozonated water and compound betamethasone injection in a glenohumeral joint on patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder (ACS). Methods From January 2019 to March 2020, eighty‑six patients with ACS in the Department of Pain Management in Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were selected. Those patients were divided into group T (ozonated water) and group C (compound betamethasone) according to the random number table method, with 43 cases in each group. Both groups received an ultrasound‑guided glenohumeral joint injection (once a week, three consecutive times), the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and range of motion (ROM) were recorded before treatment and 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment; the effective rate at 1 month and 3 months after treatment, Self‑Rating Scale of Sleep (SRSS) before treatment and 1 month, 3 months after the treatment, utilization of analgesics at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months after the treatment, and adverse reactions were also recorded. Results At each time point after treatment between the two groups, the NRS and SRSS were significantly lower than those values before treatment while the ROM (flexion, extension, abduction) was significantly higher than those values before treatment, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The NRS and utilization of analgesics in group T at 3 months after treatment was higher than the amount of group C. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference at 2 weeks and 1 month after treatment between the two groups (P>0.05). There was also no significant difference in ROM (flexion, extension, abduction) at each time point before and after treatment between the two groups (P>0.05). At 3 months after treatment, the effective rate of group T was significantly lower than the rate in group C, the SRSS of group T was higher than group C, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the effective rate and SRSS at 1 month after treatment (P>0.05). Six patients in the two groups experienced short‑term pain aggravation after treatment, blood sugar was increased to varying degrees in some patients with diabetes, but there were no other obvious adverse reactions. Conclusions Ultrasound‑guided ozonated water and compound betamethasone both are effective methods for the treatment of ACS, but compound betamethasone has a better mid‑term clinical effect.

Key words: Ozonated water; Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder; Joint injection; Pain