国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2021, Issue (9): 4-4
    
程控间歇硬膜外脉冲输注模式下硬脊膜穿破硬膜外阻滞在分娩镇痛中的应用
晏明, 王巧, 张玉凤, 崔恩惠, 周静, 张浩, 丁松, 孙剑1()
1.徐州医科大学淮安妇幼临床学院(淮安市妇幼保健院)
Application of dural puncture epidural for labor analgesia during programmed intermittent epidural bolus
 全文:
摘要:

目的 评价程控间歇硬膜外脉冲输注(programmed intermittent epidural bolus, PIEB)模式下硬脊膜穿破硬膜外(dural puncture epidural, DPE)阻滞在分娩镇痛中的意义及对新生儿的影响。 方法 选择入产房后要求硬膜外镇痛时宫颈扩张<5 cm、孕37~42周、单胎头位、ASA分级Ⅰ‑Ⅱ级的初产妇298例。采用在线随机数生成器将产妇分为3组:连续硬膜外输注(continuous epidural infusion, CEI)模式下硬膜外(epidural, EP)阻滞组(CEI+EP组,99例)、PIEB模式下EP阻滞组(PIEB+EP组,98例)和PIEB模式下DPE阻滞组(PIEB+DPE组,101例)。记录产妇达到疼痛数字评分(Numeric Rating Scale, NRS)≤1 分的时间,罗哌卡因用量,两侧感觉阻滞平面上限,宫口开全时NRS评分,第一产程及第二产程时长,双侧感觉阻滞平面至S2例数,不对称阻滞、镇痛不全、更换导管、产间发热、改良Bromage评分≥1分、胎心过缓、低血压、低氧血症、恶心、瘙痒、头痛、剖宫产、器械助产的发生率,以及新生儿体重、出生后1 min Apgar 评分≤7分和出生后5 min时Apgar 评分≤7分的发生情况。 结果 PIEB+DPE组NRS≤1分的时间短于CEI+EP组和PIEB+EP组(P<0.05)。PIEB+EP组和PIEB+DPE组宫口开全时NRS评分、罗哌卡因用量及镇痛不全、不对称阻滞、产间发热发生率低于CEI+EP组(P<0.05),PIEB+DPE组宫口开全时NRS评分、罗哌卡因用量及镇痛不全、不对称阻滞、产间发热发生率低于PIEB+EP组(P<0.05)。PIEB+EP组和PIEB+DPE组双侧感觉阻滞平面至S2比例高于CEI+EP组(P<0.05),PIEB+DPE组双侧感觉阻滞平面至S2比例高于PIEB+EP组(P<0.05)。产妇其余指标及新生儿指标比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 PIEB模式下DPE技术可缩短镇痛起效时间,减少罗哌卡因用量,降低产妇发热的比例。

关键词: 硬脊膜穿破硬膜外阻滞; 硬膜外阻滞; 程控间歇硬膜外脉冲输注; 连续硬膜外
Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the significance of dural puncture epidural (DPE) for labor analgesia during programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) and its effect on neonates. Methods A total of 298 primiparas, with cervical dilation <5 cm, a gestational age of 37 to 42 weeks, singleton pregnancy at the occipito‑anterior position, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Ⅰ or Ⅱ were selected for epidural analgesia. The patients were divided into three groups using a random number generator: a continuous epidural infusion (CEI)+epidural (EP) group (n=99), a PIEB+EP group (n=98) and a PIEB+DPE group (n=101). The following data were collected: the time to reach the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score ≤ 1, the consumption of ropivacaine, the upper limit of bilateral sensory block level, the NRS score when the uterine neck completely dilated, the length of first and second stage of labor, the incidences of bilateral sensory block level to S2, asymmetric block, incomplete analgesia, replacement of catheter, intrapartum fever, modified Bromage score≥1, fetal bradycardia, hypotension, hypoxemia, nausea, itching, headache, cesarean section, and instrumental delivery, as well as newborn weight, and the rate of Apgar score≤ 7 at 1 min and 5 min. Results The PIEB+DPE group presented shorter time of NRS≤1 min than the CEI+EP and PIEB+EP groups (P<0.05). The PIEB+EP and PIEB+DPE groups showed remarkable decreases in the NRS score when the uterine neck completely dilated, the consumption of ropivacaine, and the incidences of asymmetric block and interlabor fever, compared with the CEI+EP group (P<0.05). The PIEB+DPE group showed remarkable decreases in the NRS score when the uterine neck completely dilated, the consumption of ropivacaine, and the incidences of asymmetric block and interlabor fever, compared with the PIEB+EP group (P<0.05). The PIEB+EP and PIEB+DPE groups had a higher percentage of bilateral sensory block plane to S2 than the CEI+EP group (P<0.05), where the percentage of bilateral sensory block plane to S2 in the PIEB+DPE group was higher than that in the PIEB+EP group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in other indexes among three groups (P>0.05). Conclusions The application of DPE during PIEB can shorten the onset time of analgesia, reduce the dosage of ropivacaine, and decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever.

Key words: Dural puncture epidural block; Epidural block; Programmed intermittent epidural bolus; Continuous epidural infusion