国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (1): 0-0
    
不同麻醉方式对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期免疫功能及苏醒期质量的影响
张美峰, 武淑芳, 苗清华, 宁新宇1()
1.山西医科大学麻醉学系
Effects of different anesthesia methods on the perioperative immune function and recovery quality of patients undergoing radical resection of colorectal cancer
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨4种不同麻醉方式对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期机体免疫功能及苏醒期质量的影响。 方法 择期行腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术患者120例,按随机数字表法分为4组(每组30例):全凭静脉麻醉组(N组)、腹横肌平面阻滞(transversus abdominis plane block, TAPB)联合全身麻醉组(T组)、硬膜外阻滞(epidural block, EB)联合全身麻醉组(S组)及TAPB联合右美托咪定(dexmedetomidine, Dex)复合全身麻醉组(TD组)。N组患者采用全凭静脉麻醉诱导与维持,T组患者在全身麻醉诱导前行超声引导下双侧TAPB,S组于L2‑L3行EB,TD组在全身麻醉诱导前行超声引导下双侧TAPB,麻醉维持过程中静脉输注Dex 0.3 μg·kg−1·h−1至术毕前30 min。记录4组患者的手术时间、麻醉时间、术中出血量及丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼、血管活性药物等术中用药情况。于术前1 d(T0)、术后1 d(T1)、术后3 d(T2)、术后5 d(T3)检测患者外周血T细胞亚群CD3+、CD4+、CD8+水平及自然杀伤(natural killer, NK)细胞水平,并计算CD4+/CD8+;记录患者苏醒期拔管时Ramsay镇静评分,最高VAS疼痛评分及咳嗽、寒战、躁动和恶心呕吐的发生情况。 结果 与T0时比较,T1时4组的NK细胞水平降低(P<0.05),CD3+、CD4+水平及CD4+/CD8+降低(P<0.05);T2时4组的NK细胞水平降低(P<0.05),CD3+、CD4+水平及N组、T组的CD4+/CD8+降低(P<0.05)。与T组比较,T1、T2时N组的NK细胞水平降低(P<0.05),CD3+、CD4+水平及CD4+/CD8+降低(P<0.05);而S组和TD组的NK细胞水平升高(P<0.05),CD3+、CD4+水平及CD4+/CD8+升高(P<0.05)。与N组比较,T1、T2时S组和TD组的NK细胞水平升高(P<0.05),CD3+、CD4+水平及CD4+/CD8+升高(P<0.05)。与N组、T组比较,S组、TD组术中丙泊酚及瑞芬太尼用量减少(P<0.05)。S组血管活性药物使用率高于N组、T组、TD组(P<0.05)。与N组比较,T组、S组和TD组最高VAS疼痛评分降低(P<0.05),TD组和S组恶心呕吐的发生率降低(P<0.05),TD组咳嗽、躁动、寒战的发生率降低且拔管时Ramsay镇静评分升高(P<0.05)。与T组比较,TD组和S组恶心呕吐发生率降低(P<0.05),TD组咳嗽、躁动、寒战的发生率降低且拔管时Ramsay镇静评分升高(P<0.05)。与S组比较,TD组咳嗽、躁动、寒战的发生率降低(P<0.05),拔管时Ramsay镇静评分升高(P<0.05)。其余指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 相较于全凭静脉麻醉、TAPB联合全身麻醉、EB联合全身麻醉,TAPB联合Dex复合全身麻醉可维持腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术患者术中血流动力学稳定,并能有效改善围手术期机体免疫功能及苏醒期质量。

关键词: 硬膜外阻滞;腹横肌平面阻滞;麻醉,全身;右美托咪定;结直肠癌;免疫抑制;苏醒期
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of four different anesthesia methods on the perioperative immune function and recovery quality of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer. Methods A total of 120 patients who were scheduled for laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer were enrolled. According to the random number table method, they were divided into four groups (n=30): a total intravenous anesthesia group (group N), a transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) combined with general anesthesia group (group T), an epidural block (EB) combined with general anesthesia group (group S) and a TAPB combined with dexmedetomidine (Dex)‑assisted general anesthesia group (group TD). Group N was induced and maintained by total intravenous anesthesia. In group T, ultrasound‑guided TAPB was performed before induction of general anesthesia. In group S, EB was performed in intervertebral space between L2‑L3. In group TD, ultrasound‑guided bilateral TAPB was performed before induction of general anesthesia, with intravenous infusion of Dex at 0.3 μg·kg−1·h−1 during anesthesia maintenance until 30 min before operation. Then, their surgical and anesthesia times and intraoperative blood loss as well as the intraoperative dosages of propofol, remifentanil and vasoactive agents were recorded. The concentrations of T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+) and natural killer (NK) cells were measured 1 day before surgery (T0), 1 day (T1), 3 days (T2) and 5 days (T3) after operation to calculate CD4+/CD8+. The Ramsay sedation scores at extubation, the highest scores of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain, and the incidences of cough, chills, agitation, nausea and vomiting were recorded. Results Compared with those at T0, the concentrations of NK cells, CD3+, and CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ in the four groups significantly decreased at T1 (P<0.05); the concentrations of NK cells, CD3+ and CD4+ in the four groups and CD4+/CD8+ in groups N and T significantly decreased at T2 (P<0.05). Compared with group T, the concentrations of NK cells, CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in group N significantly decreased at T1 and T2 (P<0.05), while groups S and TD presented significant increases in the concentrations of NK cells, CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ (P<0.05). Compared with group N, the concentrations of NK cells, CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in groups S and TD significantly increased at T1 and T2 (P<0.05). Compared with groups N and T, the dosages of propofol and remifentanil significantly reduced in groups S and TD (P<0.05). The usage of vasoactive agents in group S was more frequent than that in groups N, T and TD (P<0.05). Compared with group N, the highest scores of VAS pain in groups S, T and TD significantly decreased (P<0.05), the incidences of nausea and vomiting in groups S and TD decreased (P<0.05), the incidences of cough, chills, and agitation in group TD reduced (P<0.05) and the Ramsay sedation scores at extubation increased (P<0.05). Compared with group T, the incidences of nausea and vomiting in groups S and TD decreased (P<0.05), the incidence of cough, chills and agitation in group TD reduced, and the Ramsay sedation scores at extubation significantly increased (P<0.05). Compared with group S, the incidence of cough, chills and agitation in group TD reduced (P<0.05), but the Ramsay sedation scores at extubation increased (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in other indicators (P>0.05). Conclusions Compared with total intravenous anesthesia group, TAPB combined with general anesthesia group and EB combined with general anesthesia group, TAPB combined with Dex assisted general anesthesia group can mantain hemodynamic stability and effectively improve perioperative immune function and quality of emergence from general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer.

Key words: Epidural anaesthesia; Transversus abdominus plane block; Anesthesia, general; Dexmetomidine; Colorectal cancer; Immunosuppression; Recovery period