国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (4): 0-0
    
成年肝移植患者围手术期低体温防治的证据应用及效果评价
邢雪燕, 张欢, 李蒙, 涂淑敏1()
1.北京清华长庚医院
Evidence application and effect evaluation of the prevention and treatment of hypothermia in adult liver transplantation patients during the perioperative period
 全文:
摘要:

目的 将预防围手术期低体温的证据总结应用于临床实践,提高临床护理人员对证据应用的依从性,进而探讨证据应用对成年肝移植患者围手术期低体温的影响。 方法 2018年1月—2019年11月长庚医院行原位肝移植手术的149例患者作为对照组,2020年2月—12月于长庚医院行原位肝移植手术的137例患者作为循证组。对照组采取传统保温模式,术中以加温水毯进行保温为主,体温<36 ℃时增加压力暖风毯保温;循证组运用围手术期低体温防治的最佳证据总结,术前评估患者低体温风险,术前以压力暖风毯进行预保温,术中以压力暖风毯进行保温为主,体温<36 ℃时增加输液加温设备进行保温。比较两组患者的基础体温及麻醉后30 min、麻醉后1 h、腹腔打开、无肝期、新肝期、术毕时的体温;比较证据应用前后护理人员对围手术期低体温防治相关知识知晓情况,以及对基于证据的围手术期低体温防治措施的执行率。 结果 证据应用前护理人员对基于证据的围手术期低体温防治知识的调查问卷正确率为62%,低于证据应用后的正确率90%(P<0.05);证据应用后,护理人员对标准1、2、3、7的执行率高于应用证据前(P<0.05),而对标准4、5、6的执行率两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。无肝期、新肝期和术毕时循证组体温高于对照组(P<0.05),两组患者基础体温及麻醉后30 min、麻醉后1 h、腹腔打开时的体温差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 通过证据临床转化,可降低成年肝移植患者围手术期低体温的发生率,规范护理人员行为,提高围手术期医疗和护理质量。

关键词: 肝移植,成年人; 围手术期; 低体温; 证据; 循证医学
Abstract:

Objective To summarize the evidence concerning the prevention of perioperative hypothermia and apply into clinical practice, so as to improve the compliance of nursing staff to the application of evidence, and discuss the influence of evidence application on perioperative hypothermia in adult liver transplantation patients. Methods A total of 149 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation in Changgung Hospital from January 2018 to November 2019 were selected as a control group, while 137 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation Changgung Hospital from February to December 2020 were selected as an evidence‑based group. The control group implemented the traditional temperature protection mode: patients were kept warm with circulating water blanket during the operation, and the forced‑air warming blanket was added to keep warm when the temperature fell below 36℃. The evidence‑based group applied the best evidence for the prevention and treatment of perioperative hypothermia. The risk of hypothermia was assessed before surgery. The forced‑air warming blanket was used for pre‑warming and warming for the patient during surgery. When the temperature fell below 36℃, an infusion heating device was added for warming. Both groups were compared for the basal body temperature and the body temperature 30 min after anesthesia, 1 h after anesthesia, when the abdominal cavity was opened, at liver free stage, at new liver stage and after surgery. The knowledge of perioperative hypothermia and the implementation rate of the evidence‑based preventive measures of perioperative hypothermia were compared before and after application. Results In the questionnaire survey, the correct rate of the knowledge of evidenced‑based prevention and treatment of perioperative hypothermia before evidence application was 62%, which was lower than 90% after application (P<0.05). After evidence application, the implementation rate of nursing staff to standards 1, 2, 3, 7 was higher than those before evidence application (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the implementation rate of standards 4, 5, 6 between the two groups (P>0.05). The body temperature of the evidence‑based group was higher than that the control group at the liver free stage, new liver stage and the end of operation (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups as to basal body temperature, and the temperatures 30 min after anesthesia, 1 h after anesthesia and when the abdominal cavity was opened (P>0.05). Conclusions The evidence‑based clinical transformation model can reduce the incidence of perioperative hypothermia in adult liver transplantation patients, standardize the behavior of nursing staff, and improve the quality of perioperative medical care and nursing care.

Key words: Liver transplantation, adult; Perioperative; Hypothermia; Evidence; Evidence‑based medicine