国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (12): 4-4
    
布托啡诺对胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者的 肺保护作用
李童, 王行何, 陆雯斯, 王姝婷, 刘苏1()
1.常州市第三人民医院
Pulmonary protective effects of butorphanol in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer
 全文:
摘要:

目的 研究布托啡诺对胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者的肺保护作用。 方法 择期行胸腔镜下肺癌根治术的患者191例,按随机数字表法分为布托啡诺组(B组,95例)和对照组(C组,96例)。两组在其他麻醉用药相同基础上,B组于麻醉诱导前静脉注射布托啡诺负荷剂量10 μg/kg,随后以10 μg·kg−1·h−1的速度持续泵注直至手术结束,C组给予等量生理盐水。记录患者术后7 d内术后肺部并发症(postoperative pulmonary complication, PPC)(肺炎、肺不张、胸腔积液、气胸、呼吸衰竭和支气管痉挛)的发生率及严重程度分级;记录患者单肺通气前(T1)、单肺通气30 min(T2)、单肺通气 60 min(T3)、恢复双肺通气20 min(T4)时的PaO2、氧合指数(oxygen index, OI)、肺泡动脉氧分压差(alveolar‐arterial oxygen difference, A‑aDO2)、气道峰压(peak airway pressure, PIP)、平台压(plateau pressure, Pplat)、肺动态顺应性(dynamic lung compliance, Cdyn);记录患者术前(T0)、T1~T4、术后24 h(T5)时血清Clara细胞分泌蛋白(Clara cell secretory protein, CC16)、内皮素1(endothelin‑1, ET‑1)、IL‑6水平;记录患者术后6、12、24、48 h静息及咳嗽VAS疼痛评分;记录患者其他围手术期指标(手术时间、单肺通气时间、拔管时间、补液量、失血量、术后恶心呕吐发生率、低氧血症发生率、住院时间、术中及术后阿片类药物用量)。 结果 B组肺不张发生率及PPC总发生率低于C组(P<0.05),PPC严重程度分级<3级的患者比例高于C组(P<0.05),两组均无4、5级患者。与T1时比较,T2~T4时两组患者PaO2、OI、Cdyn降低(P<0.05),A‑aDO2升高(P<0.05)。T3~T4时B组PaO2、OI高于C组(P<0.05)。T4时B组的A‑aDO2低于C组(P<0.05),Cdyn高于C组(P<0.05)。T1~T4时两组PIP、Pplat差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。T2~T5时两组患者血清CC16、ET‑1、IL‑6水平较T0时升高(P<0.05)。T3~T5时B组CC16、ET‑1、IL‑6水平较C组降低(P<0.05)。B组患者术后6、12 h静息及咳嗽VAS疼痛评分均低于C组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后24、48 h静息及咳嗽VAS疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与C组比较,B组术中及术后阿片类药物用量减少(P<0.05)、术后恶心呕吐发生率降低(P<0.05)、住院时间缩短(P<0.05)。两组患者手术时间、单肺通气时间、拔管时间、补液量、失血量、术中低氧血症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 术中静脉使用布托啡诺可以改善胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者的肺部氧合,降低术后7 d内PPC的发生率,具有一定的肺保护作用。

关键词: 布托啡诺; 肺癌根治术; 手术并发症; 肺保护
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the pulmonary protective effects of butorphanol in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer. Methods According to the random number table method, a total of 191 patients who were scheduled for thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer were divided into a butorphanol group (group B, n=95) and a control group (group C, n=96). After anesthesia induction, group B was intravenously injected with butorphanol at a loading dose of 10 μg/kg, followed by continuous pump infusion at 10 μg·kg−1·h−1 until the end of surgery, while group C was given the same volume of normal saline, meanwhile, other anesthetics used in both groups were the same. Their occurrence and severity of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) (pneumonia, atelectasis, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, respiratory failure and bronchospasm) within seven days after surgery were recorded. The partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2), oxygen index (OI), alveolar‐arterial oxygen difference (A‑aDO2), peak airway pressure (PIP), plateau pressure (Pplat) and dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) were recorded before one‑lung ventilation (T1), after one‑lung ventilation for 30 min (T2), one‑lung ventilation for 60 min (T3) and total‑lung ventilation for 20 min (T4). The concentrations of Clara cell secretory protein (CC16), endothelin‑1 (ET‑1) and IL‑6 were measured before surgery (T0), at T1‒T4 and 24 h after surgery (T5). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at rest and on coughing were recorded at postoperative 6, 12, 24 h and 48 h. Furthermore, other perioperative indicators including surgery duration, OLV duration, extubation time, fluid volume, blood loss, the incidences of intraoperative hypoxemia and postoperative nausea and vomiting, the length of hospitalization stay, and intraoperative and postoperative opioid dosage) were recorded. Results Group B showed decreases in the incidence of atelectasis and the total incidence of PPC, and increases in the proportion of patients at PPC0.05). The plasma concentrations of CC16, ET‑1 and IL‑6 at T2‒T5 in both groups were higher than those at T0 (P<0.05). Compared with group C, the concentrations of CC16, ET‑1 and IL‑6 at T3‒T5 in group B decreased (P<0.05). Group B had lower VAS scores at rest and on coughing than group C at postoperative 6 h and 12 h (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in VAS scores at rest and on coughing between both groups at postoperative 24 h and 48 h (P>0.05). Compared with group C, group B presented decreases in the intraoperative and postoperative opioid dosage (P<0.05), the incidence of nausea and vomiting (P<0.05) and the length of hospitalization (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in surgery duration, one‑lung ventilation duration, extubation time, fluid volume, blood loss and the incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia (P>0.05). Conclusions For patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer, intravenous administration of butorphanol can improve perioperative oxygenation, reduce PPC within the first seven postoperative days, and then exhibit pulmonary protective effect.

Key words: Butorphanol; Radical resection of lung cancer; Complication of operation; Pulmonary protection