国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (7): 0-0
    
B超测量环状软骨水平气道横径对小儿加强型带套囊气管导管型号选择的预评估价值
葛艳萍, 朱珊珊, 衡垒1()
1.徐州医科大学
Pre⁃evaluation of B⁃ultrasound measurement of the horizontal airway diameter of the annular cartilage for selection of enhanced cuffed endotracheal tube in children
 全文:
摘要:

目的 比较B超测量环状软骨水平气道横径(minimal transverse diameter of the subglottic airway, MTDSA)法、年龄公式法和身高公式法对加强型带套囊气管导管型号选择的预判价值。 方法 选取睢宁县人民医院外科2021年1月—2021年12月择期手术行全麻气管插管患儿120例(排除失访及资料不全样本7例,删失率5.83%),按照分层随机区组的方式将研究样本分为年龄公式组(36例)、身高公式组(39例)和MTDSA组(38例)。气管导管选择加强型带套囊气管导管,3组分别以年龄公式法、身高公式法和B超测量MTDSA法行气管导管型号预评估,以插管成功最适气管导管型号为标准,判定3种方法的预评估准确率;比较组间换管率,插管后即刻MAP、心率,并发症情况。 结果 B超测量MTDSA法对首次气管导管型号评估的准确率为86.84%,高于年龄公式法的55.56%、身高公式法的46.15%(P<0.05)。MTDSA组换管率为5.26%、换管例次率为10.53%,均低于年龄公式组的33.33%、44.44%和身高公式组的43.59%、58.97%(P<0.05)。MTDSA组并发症中声音嘶哑(2.63%)、喉头水肿(0)发生率低于身高公式组(28.21%,20.51%)(P<0.05);年龄公式组与MTDSA组并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 B超测量MTDSA法指导加强型带套囊气管导管型号的选择具有较高的导管型号预测准确率和较低的并发症发生率。

关键词: B型超声; 环状软骨; 气管; 横径; 气管插管; 加强型带套囊气管导管
Abstract:

Objective To compare the predictive value of the minimal transverse diameter of the subglottic airway (MTDSA) measured by B‑ultrasound, age formula method and height formula method for selection of enhanced cuffed tracheal tube. Methods A total of 120 children who were admitted to Department of Surgery, Suining People's Hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 and scheduled for tracheal intubation under general anesthesia were selected (7 cases were excluded due to loss to follow‑up and incomplete data, with a deletion rate of 5.83%). According to the stratified randomization method, the samples were divided into three groups: an age formula group (n=36), a height formula group (n=39) and a MTDSA group (n=38). The enhanced cuffed endotracheal tube was selected, and the three groups were pre‑evaluated by the age formula method, height formula method and MTDSA method measured by B‑ultrasound, respectively. The pre‑evaluated accuracy of the three methods was determined, using the optimal endotracheal tube type for successful intubation as the standard. The tube exchange rate, MAP and heart rate immediately after intubation and complications among the groups were compared. Results The evaluation accuracy of the first tracheal tube selection was 86.84% for the MTDSA method measured by B‑ultrasound, which was higher than 55.56% for the age formula method and 46.15% for the height formula method (P<0.05). Using the MTDSA method measured by B‑ultrasound, the tube exchange rate was 5.26%, and the tube exchange rate was 10.53%, which were lower than those of the age formula group (33.33% and 44.44%) and the height formula group (43.59% and 58.97%) (P<0.05). The incidences of hoarseness (2.63%) and laryngeal edema (0) in the MTDSA group were lower than those in the height formula group (28.21% and 20.51%) (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in complication rates between the age formula group and MTDSA group (P>0.05). Conclusions The MTDSA method measured by B‑ultrasound for selection of enhanced cuffed endotracheal tube has good accuracy of the first intubation, with a low incidence of complications.

Key words: B⁃mode ultrasound; Cricoid cartilage; Trachea; Horizontal diameter; Tracheal intubation; Enhanced cuffed endotracheal tube