国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (8): 0-0
    
瑞马唑仑复合阿芬太尼用于无痛胃镜检查的 半数有效量
左荣华, 庄婧雯, 陈倩敏, 王志萍1()
1.徐州医科大学
Median effective dose of remimazolam combined with alfentanil for painless gastroscopy
 全文:
摘要:

目的 测定瑞马唑仑复合阿芬太尼用于无痛胃镜检查的ED50及95%有效量(95% effective dose, ED95)。 方法 选择行胃镜检查的患者60例,按年龄分为青年组(Y组,年龄18~44岁)和中年组(M组,年龄45~60岁),每组30例。所有患者静脉推注阿芬太尼5 μg/kg,30 s后推注瑞马唑仑,初始剂量为0.1 mg/kg,改良警觉/镇静评分(modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation, mOAA/S)<3分时进行胃镜检查。按照改良序贯法进行试验,根据胃镜检查的镇静效果,确定下一位患者的瑞马唑仑剂量。患者镇静“成功”,则下一例患者瑞马唑仑剂量降低0.03 mg/kg,否则增加0.03 mg/kg。记录患者瑞马唑仑用量、胃镜检查时间、苏醒时间、术中知晓及不良反应发生情况,采用概率单位回归法计算瑞马唑仑的ED50、ED95及其95%CI。 结果 Y组的ED50为0.13(0.11~0.16) mg/kg,ED95为0.19(0.16~0.33) mg/kg;M组的ED50为0.09(0.07~0.12) mg/kg,ED95为0.18(0.13~0.57) mg/kg。M组与Y组的等效比值为0.68(0.22~0.98)。两组患者检查时间、苏醒时间、低血压及呼吸抑制发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),Y组瑞马唑仑用量高于M组(P<0.05)。无患者存在术中知晓。 结论 复合阿芬太尼5 μg/kg时,瑞马唑仑用于青年患者无痛胃镜检查的ED50为0.13(0.11~0.16) mg/kg,用于中年患者的ED50为0.09(0.07~0.12) mg/kg,两者对应的等效比值为0.68(0.22~0.98)。

关键词: 瑞马唑仑; 阿芬太尼; 胃镜检查; 剂量效应关系,药物; 半数有效量
Abstract:

Objective To determine the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of remimazolam combined with alfentanil for painless gastroscopy. Methods A total of 60 patients who underwent gastroscopy were enrolled. According to their ages, they were divided into two groups (n=30): a young group (group Y, 18‒44 years old) and a middle‑aged group (group M, 45‒60 years old). All patients were intravenously infused with 5 μg/kg alfentanil, followed by a bolus injection of remimazolam 30 s later, with an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg. When the modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (mOAA/S) was less than 3 points, gastroscopy was performed. The current study was carried out using the up and down method, where the dose of remimazolam used by the next patient was determined based on the sedative effect of gastroscopy. If the patient "successfully" sedated, the remimazolam dose used by the next patient decreased by 0.03 mg/kg, otherwise increased by 0.03 mg/kg. The dose of remimazolam, gastroscopy time, recovery time, intraoperative awareness and adverse reactions were recorded. The ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by the probit regression method. Results The ED50 of remimazolam was 0.13 (0.11, 0.16) mg/kg and the ED95 was 0.19 (0.16, 0.33) mg/kg in the group Y. The ED50 of remimazolam was 0.09 (0.07, 0.12) mg/kg and the ED95 was 0.18 (0.13, 0.57) mg/kg in the group M. The equivalent ratio of the group M versus the group Y was 0.68 (0.22, 0.98). There were no statistical differences in examination time, recovery time, the incidence of hypotension and respiratory depression between the two groups (P>0.05), and the dose of remimazolam in group Y was higher than that in group M (P<0.05). None of the patients had intraoperative awareness Conclusions When remimazolam is used in combination with 5 μg/kg alfentanil, the ED50 of remimazolam for painless gastroscopy is 0.13 (0.11, 0.16) mg/kg for young patients and 0.09 (0.07, 0.12) mg/kg for middle‑aged patients. The equivalent ratio of the two groups is 0.68 (0.22, 0.98).

Key words: Remimazolam; Alfentanil; Gastroscopy; Dose‑response relation, drug; Median effective dose