国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2022, Issue (10): 0-0
    
PRT与PBC治疗伴持续疼痛型三叉神经痛的疗效比较
陈艳茹, 申文1()
1.徐州医科大学附属医院
Comparison of clinical efficacy between percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation and percutaneous balloon compression in the treatment of concomitant continuous pain in patients with trigeminal neuralgia
 全文:
摘要:

目的 探讨经皮三叉神经半月节射频热凝术(percutaneous trigeminal radiofrequency thermocoagulation, PRT)和经皮穿刺球囊压迫术(percutaneous balloon compression, PBC)治疗伴持续疼痛(concomitant continuous pain, CCP)型三叉神经痛(trigeminal neuralgia, TN)的疗效。 方法 采用回顾性分析收集2019年9月至2021年2月于徐州医科大学附属医院疼痛科接受手术治疗且完成随访的60例三叉神经2、3支疼痛的CCP型TN患者的临床资料,根据手术类型分为PRT组和PBC组(每组30例)。采用数字分级评分法(Numerical Rating Scale, NRS)和巴罗神经学研究所(Barrow Neurological Institute, BNI)疼痛分级评定标准评估患者疼痛程度和疗效,比较两组患者术前(T0)、术后即刻(T1)、术后1周(T2)、术后1个月(T3)、术后3个月(T4)、术后6个月(T5)、术后12个月(T6)的NRS评分和T1~T6时的治疗有效率,比较两组患者T3时不良反应发生率及T6时疼痛复发率。 结果 与T0比较,两组患者T1~T6时NRS评分降低(P<0.05);PRT组T4~T6时NRS评分高于PBC组(P<0.05)。PBC组T5、T6时治疗有效率优于PRT组(P<0.05)。两组患者T3时严重麻木、咀嚼力减退、流涎、口唇疱疹等不良反应总发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PRT组T6时疼痛复发率高于PBC组(P<0.05)。 结论 PRT和PBC均能有效治疗CCP型TN,但PBC术后12个月的疼痛复发率较PRT低,PBC能更好地控制CCP型TN患者的疼痛。与PRT相比,PBC是治疗CCP型TN的更优选择。

关键词: 三叉神经痛; 疼痛; 射频热凝术; 经皮穿刺球囊压迫术; 疗效
Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of percutaneous trigeminal radiofrequency thermocoagulation (PRT) and percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in the treatment of concomitant continuous pain (CCP) in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Methods A total of 60 TN patients with CCP in trigeminal nerve branch 2 and (or) 3, who were treated in Department of Pain, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from September 2019 to February 2021 were enrolled and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment method, they were divided into two groups (n=30): a PRT group and a PBC group. Their pain and therapeutic effectiveness were evaluated by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI). The two groups were compared for NRS before operation (T0), immediately after postoperation (T1), one week after operation (T2), one month after operation (T3), three months after operation (T4), six months after operation (T5) and twelve months after operation (T6) and effective rate at T1‒T6. Their incidence of adverse reaction at T3 and the recurrence rate at T6 were compared. Results Compared with those at T0, NRS decreased at T1‒T6 in the two groups (P<0.05); and the PRT group showed higher NRS than the PBC group at T4‒T6 (P<0.05). The therapeutic effectiveness was better in the PBC group than in the PRT group at T5 and T6 (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the overall incidence of adverse reactions, such as severe numbness, decreased chewing power, salivation, and cold sores at T3 between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain recurrence rate was higher in the PRT group than the PBC group at T6 (P<0.05). Conclusions Both PRT and PBC can effectively treat TN patient with CCP. The pain recurrence rate was lower in the PBC group than the PRC group within twelve months after surgery. Compared with PRT, PBC is more effective in the treatment of CCP in TN patients.

Key words: Trigeminal neuralgia; Pain; Radiofrequency thermocoagulation; Percutaneous balloon compression; Therapeutic effects