国际麻醉学与复苏杂志   2023, Issue (8): 0-0
    
瑞马唑仑复合不同阿片类药物在无痛胃镜检查术中应用效果
彭蕊, 王倩, 杨天爽, 刘汗亲, 张建友, 孙建宏, 王茂华1()
1.扬州大学
Application effect of remimazolam combined with different opioids in painless gastroscopy
 全文:
摘要:

目的 通过比较瑞马唑仑复合不同阿片类药物与单纯瑞马唑仑用于无痛胃镜检查的临床效果,探讨瑞马唑仑与不同阿片类的合理配伍用药方式。方法 选择2020年11月-12月在扬州大学附属医院拟行无痛胃镜检查的患者160例,性别不限,年龄18~64岁,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,BMI 18~30kg/m2。采用随机数字表法分为4组(n=40):瑞马唑仑分别复合芬太尼组(PF组)、舒芬太尼组(PS组)、瑞芬太尼组(PR组)及单纯瑞马唑仑组(P组)。P组单纯静脉注射瑞马唑仑0.3mg/kg,PF组、PS组、PR组分别接受静脉注射芬太尼50ug、舒芬太尼0.1ug/kg、瑞芬太尼0.25ug/kg的镇痛预处理后60s内静脉注射瑞马唑仑0.3mg/kg,当改良警觉/镇静评分(MOAA/S评分)<2分时开始胃镜操作。记录患者麻醉诱导前(T0)、入镜即刻(T1)、入镜后3min(T2)、入镜后5min(T3)时的MAP、HR、SpO2及四组胃镜检查时间、苏醒时间、离院时间、首剂镇静成功率、术中不良反应发生率,术毕采访内镜操作医生与患者对麻醉效果的满意度及患者是否愿意在未来接受同样的镇静方法。结果 P组T1时心率明显高于、T2时MAP明显低于PF、PS、PR组(P<0 .05);与P组比较,PF、PS、PR组首剂镇静成功率高,手术检查时间缩短,体动、呛咳发生率明显降低,内镜操作医生更满意 (P<0 .05);与PF组比较,PR组呛咳发生率更低(P<0 .05);与PR组比较,P、PF、PS组离院时间延长(P<0 .05),余组间差异比较无统计学意义(P>0 .05);结论 瑞马唑仑复合阿片类药物行无痛胃镜检查可明显提高单纯应用瑞马唑仑的镇静成功率、减少不良反应的发生,且瑞马唑仑复合瑞芬太尼为检查时的更优方案。

关键词: 瑞马唑仑;芬太尼;舒芬太尼;瑞芬太尼;无痛胃镜;
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of remimazolam combined with different opioids and remimazolam used alone and to expolre the rational compatibility of remimazolam in painless gastroscopy. Methods One hundred and sixty ASAⅠ or Ⅱ patients of both sexes, aged 18-64 yr, with BMI of 18-30 kg/m2, scheduled for painless gastroscopy in our hospital from November to December 2020, were selected and divided into 4 groups (n=40) using a random number table method: remimazolam combined with fentanyl group (group PF), sufentanil group (group PS), remifentanil group (group PR) and Remimazolam used alone group (group P). In group P, remimazolam 0.3mg/kg was injected intravenously. In PF, PS and PR groups, after fentanyl 50ug, sufentanil 0.1ug/kg and remifentanil 0.25ug/kg were intravenously injected, 0.3mg/kg remimazolam was intravenously injected within 60s. Gastroscopy was performed when MOAA/S<2. MAP, HR and SpO2 will be recorded before anesthesia induction (T0), immediately after entering the endoscope (T1), 3min after entering the endoscope (T2) and 5min after entering the endoscope (T3). The gastroscopy time, recovery time and discharge time, The success rate of the first dose of sedation, the incidence of intraoperative adverse reactions, The satisfaction of endoscopists and patients with anesthesia and patients' willingness to accept the same sedation method in the future were interviewed at the end of surgery. Results Heart rate was significantly higher at T1 and MAP was significantly lower at T2 in group P than in groups PF, PS and PR (P 0.05). Compared with group P, the success rate of sedation at the first dose was significantly higher, the operation time was significantly shorter, the incidence of body movement and bucking was significantly lower, and endoscopists were more satisfied in PF, PS and PR groups (P 0.05). Compared with group PF, the bucking was significantly lower in group PR (P 0.05). Compared with group PR, the time of discharge was significantly prolonged in groups P, PF and PS (P 0.05). There was no others significant difference between the groups (P>0.05) . Conclusion Remimazolam combined with opioids for painless gastroscopy can significantly improve the success rate of sedation and reduce adverse reactions than remimazolam used alone, and remimazolam combined with remifentanil is the best scheme for painless gastroscopy.

Key words: remimazolam;fentanyl;sufentanil;remifentanil;painless gastroscopy;